Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
1st Wizard

Team for Watford..

Recommended Posts

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, the below

                                                   Marshall

   Ortsemobor                     Shackle            Taylor            Lappin

      

   Chadwick                        Brellier               Russell         Croft

         

                                             Hartson         Cureton

 

Subs: Srikavka, Murray, Gilks, Smith, Martin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

Why would you leave Hartson out, he changed the game for us - set up a goal and in Magilton''s words bullied them - and he''s not even on the bench. It''s obvious thankfully that Roeder don''t rate Brown anyway as he didn''t make the bench on Sunday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marshall

Semmy   Taylor   Shackall      Lappin

Chadwick   Brellier   Russell   Smith

Brown   Cureton

Subs:  Gilks, Murray, Hartson, Martin, Croft

I think Smith is the attacking option that needs to come in for Huckerby, and as another poster suggested it doesnt have to be in a flat 4-4-2, smith could play in the hole. Though i feel he would do a job on the left.

Hartson should be left on the bench as an impact player for the second half, his performance yesterday was top notch for half an hour, but much more and he struggles. Therefore starting with Brown or Strihvka would be my choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

think this ones more liekly.. Croft and chadders are both right sided... neither will be any good on the left.. we wont play 4-4-2 tommorow

jas :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

A bit harsh on Hartson?

I agree with the other team, with Crofty on the left - dint change team that played well without good reason - and Dave on the bench, as a more mobile impact big man.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

Dont see how you can leave Hartson out of the SQUAD! Thought he did very well when he came on. Scum couldnt cope with him!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go with 

                                                 Marshall

   Ortsemobor                     Taylor            Murray           Lappin

      

    Croft                       Brellier               Russell            Chadwick 

         

                                             Hartson         Cureton

 

Subs: Srikavka, Shax, Gilks, Smith, Martin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you guys think Hartson will start?  I''m not sure he''ll last 90 mins.  Won''t Roeder have him on the bench and bring him on as necessary?  But then if Dion''s injured and he does that who will start up front with Cureton?  A recall for Brown?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

wheres hartson?
that team  but hartson instead of  brown, he may have scored but how many shots did it take him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MarshallSemmy     Taylor   Shacks    LappinChadders    Le Judge   Russell   CroftyCuro     Dave StrikerBench : Hartson, Brown, Murray, Smith, Gilks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Ginger Pele"][quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

wheres hartson?
that team  but hartson instead of  brown, he may have scored but how many shots did it take him?
[/quote]I bet hartson has had more attempts on goal in his 2 games than brown has had all season.Imo hartson ahead of brown any day of the week

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes to Rob Flecks team, but it appears that now Hucks is gone and Lappin needs to be at the back everyone is panicking and sticking Croft there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

Chadwick   Brellier   Russell   eagle

                 hartson   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, smith, brown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Cobain18"][quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

Why would you leave Hartson out, he changed the game for us - set up a goal and in Magilton''s words bullied them - and he''s not even on the bench. It''s obvious thankfully that Roeder don''t rate Brown anyway as he didn''t make the bench on Sunday.

[/quote]

big dave wasn''t on the bench either, so roeder cant rate neither. if hartson starts then he''ll have to come off at half time, no way can he last a whole game. id rather him come on when the oposition is tired look what he did to the scum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
id haveMarshall

Semmy    taylor   shackll    lappin

croft       brellier     russell     smith

             strihavka    curetonsubs  gilks, murray, chadwick, hartson, martin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Citizen Journalist Foghorn"]

I would go with 

                                                 Marshall

   Ortsemobor                     Taylor            Murray           Lappin

      

    Croft                       Brellier               Russell            Chadwick 

         

                                             Hartson         Cureton

 

Subs: Srikavka, Shax, Gilks, Smith, Martin

[/quote]

I''d go with this, although I wouldn''t know whether to start or finish with Hartson as he won''t last  the 90. I think I''d be tempted on seeing how Dave the striker got on for the first 60 - Hartson is gonna be more effective against defenders that have already played 60 mins than he would starting.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="Royal Anglian all the way"]id have

Marshall


Semmy    taylor   shackll    lappin


croft       brellier     russell     smith


             strihavka    cureton

subs  gilks, murray, chadwick, hartson, martin
[/quote]

That would be my team, I think Hartson would be a great player to come on as an impact player, I think that Dave is a very technical player who would play well with confidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marshall

Otsemobor  Taylor   Shax   Lappin

Chadwick  Brellier   Russell    Smith

              Hartson     Cureton

Subs

Gilks  Murray, Croft,Martin, Brown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I didnt actually mean to leave Hartson out, I meant to put him on the bench. All things considered I think Brown will start as he will have more energy. Hartson will be a good option of the bench again for the last 20 minutes..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Royal Anglian all the way"]id haveMarshall

Semmy    taylor   shackll    lappin

croft       brellier     russell     smith

             strihavka    curetonsubs  gilks, murray, chadwick, hartson, martin[/quote]Can''t see Smith worth a start over Chadwick after Sunday. He''s not done anything yet to impress me. I''d be really keen to see how Chadders and Croft combine - we look dangerous when they''re pushing forward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="Cobain18"][quote user="No. 4"]

                     Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

       Chadwick   Brellier   Russell

                      Smith

            Brown   Cureton

Subs: gilks, murray,croft, spillane, strihavka  

[/quote]

Why would you leave Hartson out, he changed the game for us - set up a goal and in Magilton''s words bullied them - and he''s not even on the bench. It''s obvious thankfully that Roeder don''t rate Brown anyway as he didn''t make the bench on Sunday.

[/quote]

I don''t think it''s obvious at all that Roeder doesn''t rate Brown. I think a more likely possibility is that he knows John Hartsons game better. He''ll probably continue to pick players he knows more about until he''s had more time to get to know his squad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Marshall

Otsemobor   Taylor   Shackell   Lappin

Chadwick   Brellier   Russell   Smith

Brown   Cureton

 

Subs: Gilks, Murray, Spillane, Croft, Hartson.

 

I was thinking about playing Murray at the back with Taylor, but decided to give Shackell another chance. I put Bown on because although he doesn''t score many goals, he will hold the ball if Watford are pressuring us. Hartson and Croft should come on after about 60mins so they can freshen things up and maybe impact the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not that this is what i would go with or what i think it will be, but it is a viable formation

--------------------------------------Marshall--------------------------------------

-------------Shackell----------------Taylor-------------------Murray--------------

Otsemebor-----------------------------------------------------------------Lappin

------------------Chadwick------------Brellier------------Russell------------------

-------------------------Cureton----------Dublin/Strihavka-------------------------

 

subs:Gilks, Hartson, Croft, Smith, Spillane

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="breaker2"]

--------------------------------------Marshall--------------------------------------

-------------Shackell----------------Taylor-------------------Murray--------------

Otsemebor-----------------------------------------------------------------Lappin

------------------Chadwick------------Brellier------------Russell------------------

-------------------------Cureton----------Dublin/Strihavka-------------------------

 

subs:Gilks, Hartson, Croft, Smith, Spillane

[/quote]

I think this looks like a very good team to put out and i think it could work really well but i don''t think there is anyway it will happen.  GR will stick with a simple 442 system of:

Marshall

Otsemebor   Shackell   Taylor   Lappin

Croft   Brellier   Russell   Chadwick

Cureton   Strihavka

Subs Gilks, Hartson, Smith, Murray, Brown

Hartson would start if he could last longer then 30 min but he can''t so there is no chance of him starting.  He will come on as a sub if things aren''t going well as will smith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

marshall

otsemobor,taylor,shckell,lappin

chadwick,russell,brellier,croft

    cureton,strihavka/brown

subs:gilks,murray,smith,hartson,strihavka/brown

think hartson is better coming off the bench for about 20-25 mins rather than starting and brown or dave should be given a chance

croft would give us more width as a pose to smith on the left, don''t want to be making uneccesary changes after sunday

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would it be better to start with Hartson and get ahead to put pressure on Watford or would we get nervous should we get a lead, then try to defend, sit too deep and then risk the sucker punch.

Or, do we try to keep it tight, nick a goal with what we have and use Hartson as an impact player? The problem with the latter is that again we could be chasing the game- would Curo have missed those chances at 1-0 up?

On balance I''d start with Hartson and try to get ahead, then use Brown to hold the ball up in the second half and drop slightly deeper if we are ahead.

After Sunday I''ll almost be disappointed with a draw but I know that a point would still be good tonight as Roeder and Clark  have still had virtually no time to work with the team properly yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...