Hog 0 Posted October 6, 2007 OOOOHHHHH! why bother telling us this Archant? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TwoSheds 0 Posted October 6, 2007 [quote user="Salahuddin"]OOOOHHHHH! why bother telling us this Archant?[/quote]Why bother to post it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Le Bob 0 Posted October 6, 2007 Because thats their job......to report news..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
In Dubious Battle 0 Posted October 6, 2007 [quote user="Gary Royall"]Because thats their job......to report news.....[/quote]yeah but it''s not really news is it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hog 0 Posted October 6, 2007 [quote user="TwoSheds"][quote user="Salahuddin"]OOOOHHHHH! why bother telling us this Archant?[/quote]Why bother to post it?[/quote] why bother replying? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Harvey-Jones 0 Posted October 6, 2007 Should have been £125,000. We waived £100k to bring Grant to the club. What a waste of yet more money! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Unlucky Fried Kitten 0 Posted October 6, 2007 I hope the club don''t spend it all at once! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alex_ncfc 643 Posted October 6, 2007 That''ll fill Hucks'' pockets for a week and a half then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BCanary 0 Posted October 6, 2007 Might pay for the hotel we''re putting the players up in on Sunday night. And we''ll still lose on Monday, no doubt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr_Chimp 0 Posted October 6, 2007 Didn''t Doncaster say that the considerable compensation paid for Peter Grant''s services was proof that the board hadn''t gone for ''a cheap option'' in an email correspondence with a poster here?No slight on Grant; but a bit of believability-stretching by the club to state that effectively not accepting a prospective sum is the same as paying out compensation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
london Canary 0 Posted October 6, 2007 so much for us NOT taking the cheap option in grant because "we paid a compensation package to westham, whereas we could have gone for one of the free agents" We didn''t pay a penny for grant!! Did the fact that we could wave the £100,000 from ashton, swing it in grant''s favour? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Citizen Journalist Foghorn 0 Posted October 6, 2007 [quote user="Alex Harvey-Jones"]Should have been £125,000. We waived £100k to bring Grant to the club. What a waste of yet more money![/quote]25K ... Wooooooo.........100K at least to tempt the exceptional managerial talent Grant here... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fattyowls 0 Posted October 6, 2007 since robbo cost 50k, lets get him back for 25k to help out in midfieldthat should be able to pay for him to put in half of those quality contributions he put in last timehmmm ....i apologise Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wazzock 863 Posted October 6, 2007 Alex Harvey-Jones wrote Should have been £125,000. We waived £100k to bring Grant to the club. What a waste of yet more money! Unbelieveable! West Ham should be charged with robbery !!...or our board with gross stupidity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Harvey-Jones 0 Posted October 6, 2007 [quote user="Steve Burns"]Alex Harvey-Jones wrote Should have been £125,000. We waived £100k to bring Grant to the club. What a waste of yet more money! Unbelieveable! West Ham should be charged with robbery !!...or our board with gross stupidity.[/quote] I would imagine the total package was more than £100,000! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dizzy Rascal 0 Posted October 6, 2007 [quote user="JaundicedJockGeorgy"]I hope the club don''t spend it all at once![/quote]haha! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pyro Pete 1,849 Posted October 6, 2007 Looks like he won''t play for England because he''s injured. Again.http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internationals/7031250.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norwich R Us 59 Posted October 6, 2007 looks like it won''t happen anyway..http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internationals/7031250.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Humphrey 13 Posted October 6, 2007 Now we probably won''t get that as he''s injured... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Desert Fox 0 Posted October 6, 2007 No we wont. He is injured, so lets hope that the £25K has not already been "budgeted for". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lobster catcher 0 Posted October 6, 2007 25k thats enough to pay grant''s wages for about 3 months isn''t it,or is he on more than that with win bonus''s(thats a joke of course) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted October 6, 2007 im sure the money has been "accounted for" and will 100% will go "entirely into Grants budget!" which is the bollox we have been spun in the past.. it was only recently that the lub said the manager DOES NOT get 100% of all money associate with Transfers... jas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HappyhammerAndy 0 Posted October 6, 2007 Seems, like he''s probably out of the squad injured. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites