Tom NCFC 0 Posted November 19, 2006 Because it looked like he dislocated his shoulder when the scumer pushed him into the billboard. Was it a dislocation? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldyboy 0 Posted November 19, 2006 grant said hes off to hospital with a damaged shoulder. didnt sound good!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Master J-Do Pur 0 Posted November 19, 2006 It looked painful and he did look in serious pain. I dont think you would go off on your debut unless you knew it was something serious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alex Harvey-Jones 0 Posted November 19, 2006 Considering the way Neil Reynolds was holding Chadwick on the touchline after he fell, it did look like he had dislocated it. That would be just great. Sometimes I think we must be the unluckiest club in the world for injuries. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 3,636 Posted November 19, 2006 [quote user="Alex Harvey-Jones"]Considering the way Neil Reynolds was holding Chadwick on the touchline after he fell, it did look like he had dislocated it. That would be just great. Sometimes I think we must be the unluckiest club in the world for injuries.[/quote]I''m no medical man but is a dislocation not ''better'' than a break? I always thought so but may be way wrong!! It is just our luck to just get a player in who will give his all for us only for him to get injured straight away...there are several of the other lazy ''senior'' players who it could''ve happened to and we''d not miss half as much. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
apprentice 0 Posted November 19, 2006 [quote user="Alex Harvey-Jones"]Considering the way Neil Reynolds was holding Chadwick on the touchline after he fell, it did look like he had dislocated it. That would be just great. Sometimes I think we must be the unluckiest club in the world for injuries.[/quote] Agree we are quite unlucky, but think Geordies would have a good shout for being the most unluckiest!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted November 19, 2006 the stretcher bearers were useless! if that had been one of their players theyd of been on faster than Linford christie! chadwick was in some pain and they wandered round like they didnt have a care in the world.jas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Regime Change 0 Posted November 19, 2006 [quote user="Branston Pickle"][quote user="Alex Harvey-Jones"]Considering the way Neil Reynolds was holding Chadwick on the touchline after he fell, it did look like he had dislocated it. That would be just great. Sometimes I think we must be the unluckiest club in the world for injuries.[/quote]I''m no medical man but is a dislocation not ''better'' than a break? I always thought so but may be way wrong!! It is just our luck to just get a player in who will give his all for us only for him to get injured straight away...there are several of the other lazy ''senior'' players who it could''ve happened to and we''d not miss half as much.[/quote]I don''t think there is a lot of difference. If the arm is dislocated it could still pop back out, so his arm would need to be heavily strapped, and realistically I''d say he could be out for 6- 8 weeks. The worse case scenario is if they cannot get the arm to stay in the socket is surgery. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canary cherub 1 Posted November 19, 2006 On Sky they said it''s a badly gashed knee. Has Chadwick damaged his shoulder as well? Oh great.Or maybe Granty doesn''t know his knee from his shoulder? As long as he knows his arse from his elbow that''s all that matters . . . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites