Evil Monkey 52 Posted October 24, 2006 Given that reports on another thread suggest that the Hotel is also bouncing the noisefrom the Away fans back into the ground (as is logical), would we nowwant to think about moving these fans elsewhere? Aside from thehilarity of having them sit on plastic chairs whilst the South Standwas being redeveloped, I always thought it strange that we then stuckthem back in the nice, cosy new stand rather than elsewhere.Many other clubs relegate the away fans to some of the worse or uncovered parts of the ground, such as at Portsmouth or York.I know there are Season Ticket implications here, but I''d prefer to seethem in the corner of the City Stand, in the current family bit next tothe River End, out of harm''s way. Then again, there''d be the danger ofthe away fans out-singing the current residents of both these stands, and the banter with the Barclay is always fun for them and us.Where would you like to see them, or are they okay where they are? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mbncfc 1 Posted October 24, 2006 I remember this coming up when they were rebuilding the South Stand. In complete agreement that the 2 rows for the away fans along the touchline when the building work was going on behind them was a stroke of genius!I think they opted to keep the away fans in the new stand as it would be easier to move the ''barrier'' between the 2 sets of supporters, and allow the club to sell any tickets that were returned as soon as possible.I''ve always struggled for where else they could be put. Weren''t they in the upper barclay for a short period of time, but they kept spitting and chucking coins down on the Lower B?Personally, I like it how it is. Helps build the atmosphere... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kathy 733 Posted October 24, 2006 [quote user="Evil Monkey"]Many other clubs relegate the away fans to some of the worse or uncovered parts of the ground, such as at Portsmouth or York.[/quote] Its a bit cruel sending them that far away isnt it? Oh all right then. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hucka Hucka Huckerby 0 Posted October 24, 2006 They have to stay where they are! Half the fun of going to the football would be removed unless we in the Barclay relocated to the River End! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norphilwich 0 Posted October 24, 2006 The best place is where they are now........Moving them away from the Barclay would be the wrong thing to do. I don''t know if you can remember, but when Chase put them at the top of the Barclay that was just one of the many things he done wrong at the club... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Original Yellow Fever 0 Posted October 24, 2006 Keep them where they are, Many grounds put them behind a goal, giving them the ability to support their keeper and abuse our keeper for a half each. If they stay secluded it is better for us and let the Barclay sing nice ditties to them for 90 mins. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ManchesterCanary 0 Posted October 24, 2006 I''ve seen opposition supporters in the river end in the 70''s, then in the south stand, then next to us in the Barclay divided by a horrendous fence and a stretch of no mans land (Hammers fans throwing tomatoes with razor blades inside was no fun). Conclusion...it doesn''t make a difference, the banter is still there. What we should be is grateful its safe, battles in the Barclay are thankfully a thing of the past. However, wherever they sit they have the advantage of all singing together and generally making more noise. In the extreme I saw five Sevilla fans outsing MU supporters at the Old Trafford cathedral recently, it was pitiful, admittedly it was a friendly...but the Barclay needs to try and raise the level. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ca 1 Posted October 24, 2006 I think you''d lose some of the fun and atmosphere if you moved them away from the Barclay. Thought the family section was in the Jarrold Stand Monkey, river end. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Voice of the Thorpe Area 0 Posted October 24, 2006 Although I agree that it is naff that away fans get the best stand; there are implications of moving them; ie, there must be I think about at least 6 seats between home and away fans (as there is currently in the south stand), moving them to anywhere else in the ground would mean that either side of them must be x amount of spare seats; less home fans- less noise- less money; unless of course we stick them in the the corner of the upper river, but then you risk fans throwing objects into the family area. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sket 0 Posted October 24, 2006 I dont really mind it how it is but if anything HAD to change i would move them (away fans) in to the A and B of the barclay. This means that they would be surrounded by the snake pit, and the C/D/E blocks and the upper tier of the barclay. If A and B dont create enough seats then they could possibly be given upper A and B. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Rages 0 Posted October 24, 2006 If the away fans noise is increased by the hotel, then likewise the Barclay will also be louder.No problem, leave them where they are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rudolph Hucker 0 Posted October 24, 2006 According to ground regs....on their @rses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
south stand corner terrace 0 Posted October 24, 2006 I remember the away fans being in the upper Barclay. Spurs and Coventry spring to mind, all matter of objects were getting thrown down to the lower barclay including seats. I think they are fine where they are, plus they have a quicker route to the train station as well Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pyro Pete 1,889 Posted October 24, 2006 Give them a deckchair each, and send them to the roof of the hotel. It can be our new roof terrace. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Rages 0 Posted October 24, 2006 [quote user="kneeelo 74"]I remember the away fans being in the upper Barclay. Spurs and Coventry spring to mind, all matter of objects were getting thrown down to the lower barclay including seats. I think they are fine where they are, plus they have a quicker route to the train station as well[/quote]''all matter of objects were getting thrown down to the lower barclay including seats. I think they are fine where they are''The seats or the supporters? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bury Green 0 Posted October 24, 2006 Given that not many of us have a great amount of faith in the new hotel how about getting them room 6 on the 4th floor? Otherwise they need to be in directing firing line of the Barclay so I think we ought to keep them where they are currently, anywhere else and they will be out of range Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hucka Hucka Huckerby 0 Posted October 25, 2006 [quote user="mbncfc"]I remember this coming up when they were rebuilding the South Stand. In complete agreement that the 2 rows for the away fans along the touchline when the building work was going on behind them was a stroke of genius!I think they opted to keep the away fans in the new stand as it would be easier to move the ''barrier'' between the 2 sets of supporters, and allow the club to sell any tickets that were returned as soon as possible.I''ve always struggled for where else they could be put. Weren''t they in the upper barclay for a short period of time, but they kept spitting and chucking coins down on the Lower B?Personally, I like it how it is. Helps build the atmosphere...[/quote]Yes, putting them in the upper Barclay wasn’t the most intelligent of moves. I remember Spurs fans spitting over the edge for 90 minutes… Such nice people! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mbncfc 1 Posted October 25, 2006 [quote user="Bruce''s Header"][quote user="mbncfc"] I remember this coming up when they were rebuilding the South Stand. In complete agreement that the 2 rows for the away fans along the touchline when the building work was going on behind them was a stroke of genius!I think they opted to keep the away fans in the new stand as it would be easier to move the ''barrier'' between the 2 sets of supporters, and allow the club to sell any tickets that were returned as soon as possible.I''ve always struggled for where else they could be put. Weren''t they in the upper barclay for a short period of time, but they kept spitting and chucking coins down on the Lower B?Personally, I like it how it is. Helps build the atmosphere... Yes, putting them in the upper Barclay wasn’t the most intelligent of moves. I remember Spurs fans spitting over the edge for 90 minutes… Such nice people! [/quote]agreed. i hate spurs. one random drunk spurs fans started kicking at me in Liverpool St station once simply for the fact i was a norwich fan. or maybe because he was a drunk/loser/spurs fan... summat or other... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,509 Posted October 25, 2006 [quote user="Kathy"][quote user="Evil Monkey"]Many other clubs relegate the away fans to some of the worse or uncovered parts of the ground, such as at Portsmouth or York.[/quote] Its a bit cruel sending them that far away isnt it? Oh all right then.Good one Kathy [:D]Seriously though, I like them to be right where they are now when we win, but when we lose Portsmouth and York would be fine by me! [/quote] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Unlucky Fried Kitten 0 Posted October 25, 2006 How about building a small shed-like construction in front of the new hotel for them, thus freeing up an extra couple of thousand seats for City fans in the Jarrold Stand. The sheds walls could be padded with special sound-deadening material in order to quell the noise from the away rabble. Sorted! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites