Jump to content
cambridgeshire canary

Norfolk Holdings to to enable majority control of club

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, essex canary said:

As @norwich canary has told you many times you are not one of us.

And as I have replied many times, I am  extremely glad that I am not one of ' you'... you ,  Waveney  and Vince.... hardly company to be proud of , is it Kev? But you crack on , making a fool of yourself, embarrassing your family , alienating yourself from fellow supporters,  ADs  , Club officials... have I missed someone who finds you ridiculous? Probably ، but I'm sure they'll  surface.   

You however view these 'supporters' as your allies. That my friend is a sure indicator of your abject failure to court the power and influence  you crave.  The Hyacinth Bucket of NCFC Kev, that's you , ideas above your station and malicious curtain twitching for a hobby. So very , very sad.  Now I must get the maid to pack my valiase for my latest property portfolio  holiday/ site visits. So glad I invested  in this and not the obviously vanity inspired share offer  some 20 odd years ago.. you've got a seat you don't enjoy using, by the,sound of it , you dont enjoy footy that much either.  I may invest in football one day, once I no longer have any faculties that function, what caused such an early breakdown  in your business nous?  Would you not listen to common sense, then as now? Its OK,  we know the answers, you fancied a bit of kudos, some clout, a bit of handshaking in those corridors  , but as ever , your toxic presence repulsed everyone you came into contact with and you are now a pariah.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Perhaps I will also ask in 2 weeks time why an independent advisor such as Neil Doncaster wasn't engaged for purpose.

If you have a line in you could give advance notice on both questions as they never seem to indulge  the timewasting of even considering the pathetic and childish  written AGM questions I prepare in advance.

Sorted!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, essex canary said:

As @norwich canary has told you many times you are not one of us.

It beggars belief why he bothers hanging about a football forum in another country . And then follows people about on it. Severe issues!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, GMF said:

Quite why anyone would want to suggest that taking advice from ND is the way to go, when his last act in charge of NCFC was overseeing relegation to League One, beggars belief. 

Doomcaster had completely the wrong skill set to be chief executive. He was a solicitor. You should never put them in charge of anything as their mindset is to avoid risk. Any fool knows that successful businesses require a degree of risk taking. The irony of Doomcaster's downfall was that his aversion to risk led to relegation.

Edited by Big Vince

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, wcorkcanary said:

And as I have replied many times, I am  extremely glad that I am not one of ' you'... you ,  Waveney  and Vince.... hardly company to be proud of , is it Kev? But you crack on , making a fool of yourself, embarrassing your family , alienating yourself from fellow supporters,  ADs  , Club officials... have I missed someone who finds you ridiculous? Probably ، but I'm sure they'll  surface.   

You however view these 'supporters' as your allies. That my friend is a sure indicator of your abject failure to court the power and influence  you crave.  The Hyacinth Bucket of NCFC Kev, that's you , ideas above your station and malicious curtain twitching for a hobby. So very , very sad.  Now I must get the maid to pack my valiase for my latest property portfolio  holiday/ site visits. So glad I invested  in this and not the obviously vanity inspired share offer  some 20 odd years ago.. you've got a seat you don't enjoy using, by the,sound of it , you dont enjoy footy that much either.  I may invest in football one day, once I no longer have any faculties that function, what caused such an early breakdown  in your business nous?  Would you not listen to common sense, then as now? Its OK,  we know the answers, you fancied a bit of kudos, some clout, a bit of handshaking in those corridors  , but as ever , your toxic presence repulsed everyone you came into contact with and you are now a pariah.  

 

 

I am very glad you are not one of us. If we see you coming we will cross the road to use the other pavement instead.

Big Vince

Essex Canary

Big Keith Scott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Big Vince said:

Doomcaster had completely the wrong skill set to be chief executive. He was a solicitor. You should never put them in charge of anything as their mindset is to avoid risk. Any fool knows that successful businesses require a degree of risk taking. The irony of Doomcaster's downfall was that his aversion to risk led to relegation.

To be fair solicitors are good for something but it is all about horses for courses, square pegs and round holes etc. Therein lies the problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Big Vince said:

I am very glad you are not one of us. If we see you coming we will cross the road to use the other pavement instead.

Big Vince

Essex Canary

Big Keith Scott

What Cowards!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, norwich canary said:

It beggars belief why he bothers hanging about a football forum in another country . And then follows people about on it. Severe issues!! 

Only if you're  stupid,  which if course you are. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, norwich canary said:

It beggars belief why he bothers hanging about a football forum in another country . And then follows people about on it. Severe issues!! 

PS quit while you feel you're ahead Fatso, you know what happened  last time you tried taking on someone with an IQ of over 80 , you were  humiliated.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, norwich canary said:

It beggars belief why he bothers hanging about a football forum in another country . And then follows people about on it. Severe issues!! 

Is there a law that says Norwich City fans have to live in the UK then?.............

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TheGunnShow said:

Missed Mother Teresa out of that list.

Delia and Pol Pot both celebrity chefs of course

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Robert N. LiM said:

Delia and Pol Pot both celebrity chefs of course

I didn't  know Pol Pot cooked . Every day is a school day . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wcorkcanary said:

I didn't  know Pol Pot cooked . Every day is a school day . 

It was just a joke about his name being Pot. 

I'm really hoping that one day there'll be a dictator called something like Kettle so we can argue about which was worse.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB said:

Is there a law that says Norwich City fans have to live in the UK then?.............

That isn’t what I am saying. He is not of our own. That lot who support the team down the road are odious but they are still of our own .

its a culture, moral compass thing.

His lot fuelled U Boats by night then shamelessly deny it. They also refuse to accept that Athenry Mike was a thief as examples

He just shouldn’t be on this forum 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, essex canary said:

The idea that Neil Doncaster could pick football managers is as out of its tree as the idea that the current ED can head up Fan Engagement. Perhaps Neil Doncaster's appearance as Delia's guest last Saturday means she has woken up to the latter?

How do you know Neil Doncaster was Delia’s guest?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, norwich canary said:

That isn’t what I am saying. He is not of our own. That lot who support the team down the road are odious but they are still of our own .

its a culture, moral compass thing.

His lot fuelled U Boats by night then shamelessly deny it. They also refuse to accept that Athenry Mike was a thief as examples

He just shouldn’t be on this forum 

 

 

 

That shows you know absolutely nothing about Corkio then...........

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, nutty nigel said:

How do you know Neil Doncaster was Delia’s guest?

Given that he and (it appeared) his family was sitting directly behind her and she has now been declared as having a number of guest tickets allocated, it is a reasonable assumption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB said:

That shows you know absolutely nothing about Corkio then...........

We know that behaviour such as implying low IQ of other posters should be challenged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, essex canary said:

Given that he and (it appeared) his family was sitting directly behind her and she has now been declared as having a number of guest tickets allocated, it is a reasonable assumption.

So you make something up and it’s a “reasonable assumption.” Yet at the same time set yourself up as judge and jury on on the honesty of any claims people at our football club make.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, nutty nigel said:

So you make something up and it’s a “reasonable assumption.” Yet at the same time set yourself up as judge and jury on on the honesty of any claims people at our football club make.

 

It is a 'reasonable assumption' though it could be wrong. I think I am entitled to be judge and jury on my own investments relative to Tom Smith who hasnt done likewise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, nutty nigel said:

So you make something up and it’s a “reasonable assumption.” Yet at the same time set yourself up as judge and jury on on the honesty of any claims people at our football club make.

 

My understanding of the document shareholders have received is that the Suffolk Socialists and their guests have a total of eight seats on the front row of the directors' box. Hence, the "Presidents' Row". This comes under the heading "Access rights and benefits".

Edited by Big Vince

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Big Vince said:

My understanding of the document shareholders have received is that the Suffolk Socialists and their guests have a total of eight seats on the front row of the directors' box. Hence, the "Presidents' Row". This comes under the heading "Access rights and benefits".

So perhaps someone from directors box VAR could draw some lines on Essex’s screen to help us determine if Doomy was actually behind Presidents Row…

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, nutty nigel said:

So perhaps someone from directors box VAR could draw some lines on Essex’s screen to help us determine if Doomy was actually behind Presidents Row…

Perhaps there are some other VAR Sky subscribers on here who can verify the integrity of my TV screen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nutty nigel said:

So perhaps someone from directors box VAR could draw some lines on Essex’s screen to help us determine if Doomy was actually behind Presidents Row…

ND was behind Presidents row. That doesn't prove he paid for his seats. How many of them in there do? Clearly some like our friend Mervyn who buys one at Portman Road too and makes his point about the Carrow Road price. I doubt whether the freebies in the Directors Box decline when someone passes as they do for AD's. 

Don't worry D&M are keeping up with Starmer's Johnsonian practices.

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, essex canary said:

ND was behind Presidents row. That doesn't prove he paid for his seats. How many of them in there do? Clearly some like our friend Mervyn who buys one at Portman Road too and makes his point about the Carrow Road price. I doubt whether the freebies in the Directors Box decline when someone passes as they do for AD's. 

Don't worry D&M are keeping up with Starmer's Johnsonian practices.

.

So it’s not ‘Presidents Row’ then. Perhaps it’s the ‘Presidential Palace’

I wonder…

Have you ever been a guest in there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, norwich canary said:

That isn’t what I am saying. He is not of our own. That lot who support the team down the road are odious but they are still of our own .

its a culture, moral compass thing.

His lot fuelled U Boats by night then shamelessly deny it. They also refuse to accept that Athenry Mike was a thief as examples

He just shouldn’t be on this forum 

 

 

 

You shouldn't be. You, Essex and Vince don't represent, nor align with the culture or moral compass of the fanbase. By your own defenition, you don't belong and shouldn't be on this forum.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, chicken said:

You shouldn't be. You, Essex and Vince don't represent, nor align with the culture or moral compass of the fanbase. By your own defenition, you don't belong and shouldn't be on this forum.

 

What an odd fella you are 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, essex canary said:

I doubt whether the freebies in the Directors Box decline when someone passes as they do for AD's. 

The Framework Deed states that D&M’s access rights and entitlement to allocated tickets (aka free seats) is subject to their attendance at those games, but, crucially, those rights are non-transferable and non-inheritable. In other words, broadly similar to shareholder benefits for the original purchaser, as per the 2002 share offer documentation.

Begs the question, @essex canary, will you be pursuing a personal campaign, on Tom’s behalf to extend those benefits to him, when D&M are no longer able to attend games? 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, chicken said:

You shouldn't be. You, Essex and Vince don't represent, nor align with the culture or moral compass of the fanbase. By your own defenition, you don't belong and shouldn't be on this forum.

 

Just for the record, I do not claim to represent nor align with anybody, least of all the numpty fan base. It is not a requirement of this forum that I should. As long as I have the right to self-expression in a free society I shall continue to use and value it. Tis what previous generations have fought and died for, lest we forget.

Edited by Big Vince

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Big Vince said:

Just for the record, I do not claim to represent nor align with anybody. It is not a requirement of this forum that I should. As long as I have the right to self-expression in a free society I shall continue to use and value it. Tis what previous generations have fought and died for, lest we forget.

When you find a free society that allows self expression can you let us all know where it is please............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...