WilliamG 0 Posted April 4, 2006 Can someone please explain to me why decembers manager of the month(also dunce of the month Aug - Nov and Jan - March inclusive) feels itacceptable to defend robert green to the hilt yet gives outburtsabout/to Hux at the first opportunity? isnt this disgusting doublestandards. What are the reasons for this do we think?Is it because Hux has the club in his blood now, and won''t want toleave, and also would have limited interest (few championship clubscould afford him, few premiership clubs owuld want him) or does Worthless know his status amongst fans, so taking a further antagonising tactic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rudolph Hucker 0 Posted April 4, 2006 What a cracking observation! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Rages 0 Posted April 5, 2006 No it''s because talking yourself into the book is not acceptable in terms of being conducive to winning football matches.A personal issue externally of the ref''s eye is another issue altogether, and one that has probably been dealt with behind closed doors.As with all narrow angles you were always likely to miss the target on this one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sing up the river end 0 Posted April 5, 2006 The only fault I can see with your post is,surely he deserves more dunces of the month than that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Canaries for Ever 0 Posted April 5, 2006 [quote user="Daveinnorfolk"]Can someone please explain to me why decembers manager of the month (also dunce of the month Aug - Nov and Jan - March inclusive) feels it acceptable to defend robert green to the hilt yet gives outburts about/to Hux at the first opportunity? isnt this disgusting double standards. What are the reasons for this do we think?Is it because Hux has the club in his blood now, and won''t want to leave, and also would have limited interest (few championship clubs could afford him, few premiership clubs owuld want him) or does Worthless know his status amongst fans, so taking a further antagonising tactic.[/quote]If it needs an explanation, Green was defended in his right to make a quick decision as to ''throw or kick'' based on the circumstances as this is part of a goalkeeper''s job. Huckerby''s antics are not always part of his job. Don''t get me wrong, I like Huckerby and he is very entertaining but there is no double standard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sheded 0 Posted April 5, 2006 Don`t think there`s any double standards involved here , I just believe that the relationship between Hucks and Nigel is getting a bit strained ! and this was inevitable given that Hucks is a maverick by nature, and Nigel just thinks in straight lines ! there was a time when Nigel let Hucks have his head , and it was productive ! then Nigel succumbed to timidness and rigid thought , lo , he stuck Hucks deep on the left wing on a permanent basis , where , for two seasons , he`s became the target for every clubs neanderthals to kick mercilessly , something had to snap ! enough , as they say , is ENOUGH ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites