By Hook or Ian crook 943 Posted December 8, 2022 Have heard from a friend who works at the club we are considering Matej Vydra on a free transfer after his release from Burnley. Don’t shoot the messenger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cambridgeshire canary 7,797 Posted December 8, 2022 30 year old journeyman on silly wages? Don't sound like somethig we would do Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 10,762 Posted December 8, 2022 Didn't he have a bad injury which he should be nearly recovered from? I know Burnley offered him a contract but don't know how things ended up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
By Hook or Ian crook 943 Posted December 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, cambridgeshire canary said: 30 year old journeyman on silly wages? Don't sound like somethig we would do Just recovered from an injury wouldn’t think he would command silly wages. Plus Pukki out of contract in summer. Maybe seen as a stop gap? Just passing on what I was told. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
By Hook or Ian crook 943 Posted December 8, 2022 3 minutes ago, hogesar said: Didn't he have a bad injury which he should be nearly recovered from? I know Burnley offered him a contract but don't know how things ended up. Yes he has just recovered from an injury. He left Burnley in August when his contract expired I believe has been recovering till recently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cambridgeshire canary 7,797 Posted December 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, By Hook or Ian crook said: Just recovered from an injury wouldn’t think he would command silly wages. Plus Pukki out of contract in summer. Maybe seen as a stop gap? Just passing on what I was told. Only just got a bad injury so hes not fit and he's prone to breaking down and missing half the season? Alright I take it back he sounds like he would fit in perfectly here 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
By Hook or Ian crook 943 Posted December 8, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, cambridgeshire canary said: Only just got a bad injury so hes not fit and he's prone to breaking down and missing half the season? Alright I take it back he sounds like he would fit in perfectly here You are talking about the same recruitment guy who brought in Josip Drmic… Had the injury last season is fit now as I understand it. Also looking at doesn’t mean offering contract, we could offer trails ect to see how he is. agreed after all we do have Idah, Byram and Hayden who all seem very brittle. Edited December 8, 2022 by By Hook or Ian crook Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken Hairy 4,272 Posted December 8, 2022 Recovering from a bad injury you say??? Sign him up 👍 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheGunnShow 7,377 Posted December 8, 2022 He'd certainly give us some pace if he's fully recovered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CANARYKING 707 Posted December 8, 2022 NCFC - the home for injured players Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Parma Ham's gone mouldy 2,462 Posted December 8, 2022 You often break the rules for strikers. As we did with Rhodes for example. You need some guarantee of second tier goals to promote. The Pukki-shaped hole is frightening. I would absolutely expect us to explore every Vydra-type avenue. Parma 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Google Bot 3,929 Posted December 8, 2022 Wouldn't be awful if he's not crooked, but why couldn't he agree terms at Burnley yet could here? It can only be based on money or guaranteed selection as to why he didn't renew his contract. Don't believe we would offer more money or guarantees on game time with Sarge, Pukki and Idah coming back. More concerning if this happens is that Sarge would be left out wide. Just can't see how there's any truth in this personally. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Branston Pickle 4,149 Posted December 8, 2022 50 minutes ago, Parma Ham's gone mouldy said: You often break the rules for strikers. As we did with Rhodes for example. You need some guarantee of second tier goals to promote. The Pukki-shaped hole is frightening. I would absolutely expect us to explore every Vydra-type avenue. Parma Totally - I can imagine there’d be criticism if he was linked elsewhere without us having a look. After all - Idah’s out, as is Rowe, Rashica may be leaving etc Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
By Hook or Ian crook 943 Posted December 8, 2022 1 hour ago, Branston Pickle said: Totally - I can imagine there’d be criticism if he was linked elsewhere without us having a look. After all - Idah’s out, as is Rowe, Rashica may be leaving etc I think we could and have done much worse should he sign. Also strikes me as having similar attributes to Pukki. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pyro Pete 2,353 Posted December 8, 2022 Sounds like a wind up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
greendoor 21 Posted December 8, 2022 37 minutes ago, By Hook or Ian crook said: I think we could and have done much worse should he sign. Also strikes me as having similar attributes to Pukki. I personally would have liked him to sign for us, but that being said, I don't think he is the right signing for the club at this time. I agree that he is a player in a similar mold to Pukki and has historically been of a similar level. That is, until Farke pushed Pukki to another level by playing a style to suit him exactly. But Smith does not get anything like the performances from Pukki that his predecessor got, because he doesn't play the system to suit him. Therefore I think Vydra would have been a fantastic signing, a year or so ago to give Pukki a rest and competition but now its not worth it, we should focus on getting some tools that Smith likes to use/is suited to using. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Google Bot 3,929 Posted December 8, 2022 52 minutes ago, By Hook or Ian crook said: Also strikes me as having similar attributes to Pukki. I think Smith needs less Pukki and more Grealish. Can't we find someone with large calf muscles instead? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ron obvious 1,711 Posted December 8, 2022 Whenever I've seen him looks more like a winger who can score than a straight CF. Might complement Sarge very well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 851 Posted December 8, 2022 Presume his injury recovery would be reflected in any contract offer so I’d be game for it. Give him the 2nd half of the season to get back into the swing of things and it’ll make Pukkis departure less hard. Could be a fairly low risk gamble for a very good player at this level. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Feedthewolf 5,885 Posted December 8, 2022 Yeah, I like this idea. It might be that Idah's latest injury is more serious that we're letting on, and/or we want to loan out Hugill until his contract expires in the summer. Certainly has plenty of goals and experience at this level. Would definitely be an upgrade on what we have as backup, and as said elsewhere he can also play as a wide forward. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chicken 3,084 Posted December 8, 2022 8 minutes ago, Feedthewolf said: Yeah, I like this idea. It might be that Idah's latest injury is more serious that we're letting on, and/or we want to loan out Hugill until his contract expires in the summer. Certainly has plenty of goals and experience at this level. Would definitely be an upgrade on what we have as backup, and as said elsewhere he can also play as a wide forward. Yup. I was going to say that it could merely indicate that they have plans for some of the other players. In the long run, we face going into the summer with just Idah and Sargent as our recognised senior strikers. One will be 23 the other 22. Still very young - though no reason to say not good enough. Vydra on a contract from Jan for a season until summer of 2024 with a further option may not be a bad idea. Possibly even a shorter term deal if the rumours about loaning out Idah for regular game time were true or, like you say FtW, if they can find a new home for Hugill who I doubt they will want to keep hold of, especially if they can get some sort of fee for him (could we sell him to Coventry?). 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Feedthewolf 5,885 Posted December 8, 2022 (edited) 9 minutes ago, chicken said: Yup. I was going to say that it could merely indicate that they have plans for some of the other players. In the long run, we face going into the summer with just Idah and Sargent as our recognised senior strikers. One will be 23 the other 22. Still very young - though no reason to say not good enough. Vydra on a contract from Jan for a season until summer of 2024 with a further option may not be a bad idea. Possibly even a shorter term deal if the rumours about loaning out Idah for regular game time were true or, like you say FtW, if they can find a new home for Hugill who I doubt they will want to keep hold of, especially if they can get some sort of fee for him (could we sell him to Coventry?). Sargent, Pukki and Vydra would be more than enough to cover the number 9 position. I think if Idah were fit we'd be desperate to offload Hugill in January, but if another striker doesn't materialise then I guess we may want to keep him for the 'battering ram' option. If Idah is likely to be fit by January, though, I'd let Hugill go on a free now. He's obviously not part of our future, and holding out for a nominal fee might just lead to him kicking his heels here as fourth choice for six months. Makes sense for all parties to move him on ASAP. Edited December 8, 2022 by Feedthewolf 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites