PurpleCanary 5,554 Posted November 11, 2022 27 minutes ago, Google Bot said: Of course they had no right - that would be more akin to a legal obligation, this issue is one of trust. I am going to leave this. As far as this discussion goes the word you have used about yourself is "unbiased". "Naive or "obtuse" seem much more appropriate. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Google Bot 3,259 Posted November 11, 2022 1 hour ago, PurpleCanary said: As far as this discussion goes the word you have used about yourself is "unbiased". "Naive or "obtuse" seem much more appropriate. I am totally without bias and trying to be as objective as possible on the matter. I don't read the pinkun but I watch the podcasts and match preview vids, I don't support the club at a boardroom level but I adore following the team. So for me, these are both by-products to things that I enjoy.. And that's about it. However, When you're confusing the official stance of the club to fit a narrative, and aligning words Connor has spoken to be MY own unfounded claims, then I will correct you. It is not my fault that i'm able to take a middle ground. So, do as you wish, and throw whatever adjectives at me that make you feel better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
