Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
dylanisabaddog

Scott Parker sacked

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, king canary said:

They aren't done yet though- also last season they accounted for about 30% of their entire divisions spending. They haven't repeated the £100m splurge the first time they went up but I'd imagine they are paying out some pretty big wages. 

Amortisation means they are still, or at least have been, paying for that splurge. That, running losses at £50m a season, FFP rules and a desire to be "sustainable" means that there is little to spend in the here and now strengthening the team. You can see why Parker might have felt constrained and suggest a change of approach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Capt. Pants said:

Horrendous choice of knitwear on a hot day though is a sackable offence.

I wonder if there has been an altercation about the lack of squad strengthening. 

And so it begins. Gerrard next.

Captain Scarlet wear isn't it?

Agree about Gerrard next. Possibly then Lampard.

I felt his post match comments even after the Liverpool mauling were defeatist - even if he meant well. At least we've never had a 9-0 spanking.

More of these kinds of results to come as the PL becomes ever more imbalanced?

 

Edited by sonyc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just backs up the gulf between the ' normal ' clubs and the few elite clubs in the prem. 

Should have let them **** off to that super league that was touted around.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the way to keep your club in the PL, if you want to stay must invest.  Owner has been seduced by Eddie Howe's immediate success in keeping Bo'mth in PL for a long period.  Welcome to the yoyo brigade see you next seasson or very soon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Mr Tea said:

Just backs up the gulf between the ' normal ' clubs and the few elite clubs in the prem. 

Should have let them **** off to that super league that was touted around.

 

Except the elite clubs were only prepared to settle for the best of both worlds ie join a European super league AND stay in the Premier League.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, canarycop said:

Absolute joke of a club they are. Parker lauded for getting them promoted then sacked after being hammered by one of the best teams in the world.....laughable

Yeah, we'd never do that...

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, king canary said:

Seems like it's as much about the post match interview as the result.

I watched that interview..was never going to last long after that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why people like Hughton and Farke often bigged up the opposition, it was a way of saying the same thing Parker has without actually saying it to get themselves in trouble. It wasn't about being defeatist or disrespecting us, you can't get away with saying your squad isn't good enough so usually managers talk about how challenging the opposition are as a way to deflect blame and protect players. 

Edited by Christoph Stiepermann

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sonyc said:

Captain Scarlet wear isn't it?

Agree about Gerrard next. Possibly then Lampard.

I felt his post match comments even after the Liverpool mauling were defeatist - even if he meant well. At least we've never had a 9-0 spanking.

More of these kinds of results to come as the PL becomes ever more imbalanced?

 

"At least we've never had a 9-0 spanking."

How can you call Parker defeatist when you don't even believe in the promise of Norwich going where few clubs have gone before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Barry Brockes said:

Except the elite clubs were only prepared to settle for the best of both worlds ie join a European super league AND stay in the Premier League.

Really ?

Well that shows what i know and more importantly why there was so much opposition.

Would people have been as upset if it was just a Super League ? 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pete said:

Not the way to keep your club in the PL, if you want to stay must invest.  Owner has been seduced by Eddie Howe's immediate success in keeping Bo'mth in PL for a long period.  Welcome to the yoyo brigade see you next seasson or very soon. 

Yeah and the old arguments keep coming round again.

You maybe buy a few years in the premier league and then either you have a bad window or the money runs out, fall into the next division and are hamstrung for a decade by the financial implosion that can follow.

Or 

You don't spend, get relegated and go back to being the best of the rest on a relatively sustainable footing.

As a football fan of anyone outside of the established premier league sides, it's actually a grim choice. It's why I can't be bothered to get involved in the "should have spent money" Vs the "we can't afford it" debates. Mainly cos both sides are correct.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the Premier League. It's basically pointless and boring unless you're one of the top 6 or 7. Even if Bournemouth did spend £150m what's the best they can hope for? 14th? Relegated but a bit later in the season than others? The PL is dull. End of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From my source, who works at Bournemouth, it seems Parker is a bit ‘Hoddle-like’. Expected every player to play like him, as good as him and as committed to winning. Then through frustration, slammed everyone as “not good enough for this level”, even the players he brought in during the summer. That obviously upset everyone in the club and killed the dressing room vibe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Robornio said:

From my source, who works at Bournemouth, it seems Parker is a bit ‘Hoddle-like’. Expected every player to play like him, as good as him and as committed to winning. Then through frustration, slammed everyone as “not good enough for this level”, even the players he brought in during the summer. That obviously upset everyone in the club and killed the dressing room vibe.

It is also interesting that there don't seem to be many upset Bournemouth fans about this decision- same when he left Fulham. He seems to be someone fanbases don't get that attached to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, king canary said:

It is also interesting that there don't seem to be many upset Bournemouth fans about this decision- same when he left Fulham. He seems to be someone fanbases don't get that attached to.

He doesn't come over as a man of the people does he? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, PurpleCanary said:

If that is true then the contrast with Forest (see adjoining thread...) could hardly be clearer.

I'm not sure that the contrast is as clear as all that - it's just that Max Denim is "further down the road." He has pumped tens of millions into Bournemouth (£160 million), £28 million in the 20/21 season alone (https://www.dorset.live/sport/football/football-news/expect-revenue-fall-further-2022-6881052) - I think that he is, perhaps, reaching his limit. He must know that Bournemouth will never be a premier league fixture and will always be dependent upon his money, perhaps he's had enough of just throwing it away and wants to adopt a strategy similar to our own?

It's quite possible that the Forest owner might get fed up in the end as well - but Forest have more of a chance than Bournemouth of becoming semi-established - their crowds are three times bigger for a start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Worthy Nigelton said:

Welcome to the Premier League. It's basically pointless and boring unless you're one of the top 6 or 7. Even if Bournemouth did spend £150m what's the best they can hope for? 14th? Relegated but a bit later in the season than others? The PL is dull. End of.

Nope. Been some absolutely cracking games so far. Can't wait to get back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bournemouth are doing it "the Norwich way" this season, and Scott Parker knows it.

"Ill-equipped at this level" is another way of saying that Bournemouth would rather get relegated and cop a load of parachute money than try to stay in the Prem, so that they have an unfair financial advantage over most other Championship clubs next time round.  It's bad for the Prem and even worse for the Championship.

Parachute payments are ruining the game.  Time for a radical rethink.

Edited by benchwarmer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, YellowCanary said:

Would you have him as Norwich boss ? Not my cup of tea

In different circumstances maybe. From reading between the lines he's been sacked for talking too much truth to the press. Basically said he felt under equipped which is probably true to beat any of the top 6. He did however best Aston Villa. I'm not sure what Bournemouth expect another manager to do with the same players anyway 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, benchwarmer said:

Parachute payments are ruining the game.  Time for a radical rethink.

Agree that they are unfair on other clubs in the Champs, but parachute payments are a symptom of the problem, not the problem itself. The problem is the huge gap in income between the PL and the Champs. That's what needs the rethink. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s beaten Villa and then lost to Man City, Arsenal and spectacular to Liverpool. In terms of result they are ahead of where you would expect them to be. His comments were not great but I’m not sure what is expected really they can’t compete with three of those teams but they beat the one they have to compete with. Plus that is basically are start to last season.

On a Norwich slant Dean Smith was often criticised last year for post match comments but he obviously chose his words carefully and did not “burn” the dressing room and it shows because this season the team are still playing for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Robert N. LiM said:

Agree that they are unfair on other clubs in the Champs, but parachute payments are a symptom of the problem, not the problem itself. The problem is the huge gap in income between the PL and the Champs. That's what needs the rethink. 

Remove them and the gap would become far, far bigger than it is now. Promoted clubs would not commit themselves to transfers or contracts - as both are usually paid over three years. Plenty of clubs have been relegated from the PL in the past decade, yet have not dominated the Championship. It is the money earned from European football prize, tv, gates etc. Something that is pretty much a closed shop for the top six or so. Something that is set to be further entrenched after 2024 by the EUFA coefficient plan. Time these big clubs were stopped from having their cake and eating it. Tell them to f*ck off, and then see how well they do it what would soon become a zombie competition

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...