Jump to content
nevermind, neoliberalism has had it

Striving to make sense of the Ukraine war

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Mr Angry said:

I believe someone who is living in Kharkiv.

Why would I go to the Tory hustings?

He thinks if you're anti Putin you must be a tory. 🤨

The other fellow thinks if you're anti Putin you must be a socialist. 🤨

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Herman said:

He thinks if you're anti Putin you must be a tory. 🤨

The other fellow thinks if you're anti Putin you must be a socialist. 🤨

Really? How weird.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Mr Angry said:

Really? How weird.

I'm probably over egging it a bit, but the hard left and hard right are pro Putin and are so close to each other while still having slight differences. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Herman said:

I'm probably over egging it a bit, but the hard left and hard right are pro Putin and are so close to each other while still having slight differences. 

Ok-I have often thought that political groups could be arranged in a circle, and in that circle the far left and far right meet each other.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Donbass and Crimea are Ukrainian territory, so it's obvious that the Russians are invading. Tweet was from 2020. Russians invaded the Donbass in 2014 and have been illegally occupying the place ever since. Only Russia recognises them, nowhere else.

All those tweets are trying to get people to miss that most salient point. Russian occupation of the Donbass and the Crimea was illegal to start with.

How many nation states recognise the two separatist Donbas republics and the Crimea as separate from Ukraine?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mr Angry said:

Ok-I have often thought that political groups could be arranged in a circle, and in that circle the far left and far right meet each other.

Its probably better not to try to fit politics into any line or shape.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 23/08/2022 at 09:43, Mr Angry said:

I believe someone who is living in Kharkiv.

Why would I go to the Tory hustings?

I don't know, was merely asking. I'am also believing people who write from Dombass and Luchansk, but their views are suppressed, because it does not chime with what the Times Daily Mail, Sun and the Telegraph have to say about a Nazi wore shipping state that has alleviated the murderers of thousands of Jews to national heroes. YKNMIU

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Mr Angry said:

Ok-I have often thought that political groups could be arranged in a circle, and in that circle the far left and far right meet each other.

Yes - I think's it's more that they both become totally intolerant of anybody with opposing (or non-prescribed) views. Both become in effect totalitarian and to all intents and purposes indistinguishable in their actions if not their aims.

On here we can humour the absurd NNHHI or 7HAR but I wonder how an unhinged pro-Ukrainian post would go down in Moscow on a football forum. Likely 'Never Seen Again' at present.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Mr Angry said:

Really? How weird.

our banks are supporting Putins efforts to extract more fossil fuel, go have a chat to them about stopping their billions, because Ukraine wants the banks to stop their support.

https://www.inkl.com/news/uk-and-us-banks-among-biggest-backers-of-russian-carbon-bombs-data-shows

This is one issue I agree with Ukraine on. If they now declare Stepan Bandera as a murderous anti Semite, rather than upholding his status as a national hero, sic,  hundreds of thousands of others might also support such sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s looking likely that the Russian invaders will create a disaster at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, the biggest in Europe.

That would directly bring the west into Ukraine, maybe something both sides want.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Add targeted vandalism of Arctic ice through flaring of $8.4m worth of gas a day in the Arctic circle to Putin's crimes now. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62652133.amp

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, littleyellowbirdie said:

Add targeted vandalism of Arctic ice through flaring of $8.4m worth of gas a day in the Arctic circle to Putin's crimes now. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-62652133.amp

Not necessarily, flaring is a by product of gas production often doe as shutting in carp uses more issues! It’s still nothing compared to Gulf of Mexico and globally in condensate flaring! If the EU doesn’t want to buy the gas causing major issues for itself, then it’s a problem which Russia will carry out! It’s an unfortunate consequence of mass gas production!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Indy said:

Not necessarily, flaring is a by product of gas production often doe as shutting in carp uses more issues! It’s still nothing compared to Gulf of Mexico and globally in condensate flaring! If the EU doesn’t want to buy the gas causing major issues for itself, then it’s a problem which Russia will carry out! It’s an unfortunate consequence of mass gas production!

That's a hell of a flip around, going from extolling how 'every little helps' in terms of reducing energy consumption to save the environment on one thread, to excusing mass flaring in arguably one of the most damaging places on the planet possible on the back of sanctions triggered by an illegal invasion.

Edited by littleyellowbirdie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, littleyellowbirdie said:

That's a hell of a flip around, going from extolling how 'every little helps' in terms of reducing energy consumption to save the environment on one thread, to excusing mass flaring in arguably one of the most damaging places on the planet possible on the back of sanctions triggered by an illegal invasion.

No it’s a byproduct of producing gas! Nothing else!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Indy said:

No it’s a byproduct of producing gas! Nothing else!

They know demand is reducing so they could reduce production; continuing production and flaring in the Arctic circle at levels way beyond reasonable technical justifications is wilful environmental vandalism by Russia as a form of protest at sanctions. 

Edited by littleyellowbirdie
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, littleyellowbirdie said:

They know demand is reducing so they could reduce production; continuing production and flaring in the Arctic circle at levels way beyond reasonable technical justifications is wilful environmental vandalism by Russia as a form of protest at sanctions. 

Whatever you want to buy into! 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Indy said:

Whatever you want to buy into! 👍

If you're seriously suggesting to me that Russia is incapable of reducing gas production in response to massive reduction in demand known to it well in advance and the only thing it can do is just burn all of the unsold gas it produces unnecessarily at unprecedented levels then it's you who needs to question what you're buying into, not me. 

Edited by littleyellowbirdie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, littleyellowbirdie said:

If you're seriously suggesting to me that Russia is incapable of reducing gas production in response to massive reduction in demand known to it well in advance and the only thing it can do is just burn all of the unsold gas it produces unnecessarily at unprecedented levels then it's you who needs to question what you're buying into, not me. 

Your the one who is happily buying into using energy as you wish and blaming the global governments in not doing enough for climate change and yet a by product of gas production in flaring you get your **** in a twist! Ask yourself who the major benefactors are in rising energy prices and then you might understand it’s not all as black and white as you believe it to be. Russian government is an absolute abomination and totally wrong in its invasion, but you have such a one sided view of the west and its motives in your mind are all positive that you miss things! 
I’ll leave it there as we will never see eye to eye as America to me is as corrupt as Russia but we all accept it! Just think which two nations are making billions out of this crises!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Indy said:

Your the one who is happily buying into using energy as you wish and blaming the global governments in not doing enough for climate change and yet a by product of gas production in flaring you get your **** in a twist! Ask yourself who the major benefactors are in rising energy prices and then you might understand it’s not all as black and white as you believe it to be. Russian government is an absolute abomination and totally wrong in its invasion, but you have such a one sided view of the west and its motives in your mind are all positive that you miss things! 
I’ll leave it there as we will never see eye to eye as America to me is as corrupt as Russia but we all accept it! Just think which two nations are making billions out of this crises!

https://www.energyforgrowth.org/memo/gas-flaring-why-does-it-happen-and-what-can-stop-it/

Daily current flaring at that location is estimated at 4.34 cubic metres per day (that would be 1.6bcm per year). 

https://www.reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-nordstream/russia-burns-gas-into-the-atmosphere-while-cutting-supplies-to-eu-idINL8N3022YZ

Global gas flaring in 2019 was 140bcm, which means this one site is accounting for over 1% of all the total flaring globally annually. That is not simply a 'byproduct'. 

All else being equal, the biggest benefactor of rising energy prices is the environment, because I sure as hell can't afford to waste as much money as that being careless with energy usage, and demand will go down even further when people freeze to death next winter. 

Edited by littleyellowbirdie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, littleyellowbirdie said:

https://www.energyforgrowth.org/memo/gas-flaring-why-does-it-happen-and-what-can-stop-it/

Daily current flaring at that location is estimated at 4.34 cubic metres per day (that would be 1.6bcm per year). 

https://www.reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-nordstream/russia-burns-gas-into-the-atmosphere-while-cutting-supplies-to-eu-idINL8N3022YZ

Global gas flaring in 2019 was 140bcm, which means this one site is accounting for over 1% of all the total flaring globally annually. That is not simply a 'byproduct'. 

All else being equal, the biggest benefactor of rising energy prices is the environment, because I sure as hell can't afford to waste as much money as that being careless with energy usage, and demand will go down even further when people freeze to death next winter. 

Compared to 420 bcc per year of gas vented and flared in the US alone! You need consider flared and vented gas they’re the same by product! Like I said you really need to stop just finding stuff online to support your view and dig a little deeper! I’ll leave it there!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Yellow Fever said:

All it is Putin saying look I've got so much gas I can squander it. It's all  propaganda and mind games. Just ignore it.

Exactly my point. Wilful vandalism for political purposes. 

 

10 minutes ago, Indy said:

Compared to 420 bcc per year of gas vented and flared in the US alone! You need consider flared and vented gas they’re the same by product! Like I said you really need to stop just finding stuff online to support your view and dig a little deeper! I’ll leave it there!

The world bank estimated 140 bcm flared globally for 2021, so that figure for the US is impossible. 

https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/gasflaringreduction/global-flaring-data#:~:text=Gas Flaring Volume and Flaring,gas was flared in 2021.

The US government reports 1.48bcf/d flared, which is 15bcm/year, which means the US accounts for about 10% of global flaring, which isn't bad considering they produce about a quarter of global gas. 

https://www.energy.gov/fecm/articles/doe-flaring-and-venting-rd-reducing-emissions-and-developing-valuable-low-carbon#:~:text=According to the U.S. Energy,%2C at 1.48 Bcf%2Fd.

Edited by littleyellowbirdie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, littleyellowbirdie said:

Exactly my point. Wilful vandalism for political purposes. 

 

The world bank estimated 140 bcm flared globally for 2021, so that figure for the US is impossible. 

https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/gasflaringreduction/global-flaring-data#:~:text=Gas Flaring Volume and Flaring,gas was flared in 2021.

The US government reports 1.48bcf/d flared, which is 15bcm/year, which means the US accounts for about 10% of global flaring, which isn't bad considering they produce about a quarter of global gas. 

https://www.energy.gov/fecm/articles/doe-flaring-and-venting-rd-reducing-emissions-and-developing-valuable-low-carbon#:~:text=According to the U.S. Energy,%2C at 1.48 Bcf%2Fd.

Yes I was quoting feet and indeed it is around 15 million cm flared. Even so the point is relevant, two major countries in Saudi & US are gaining from artificially inflated prices and those companies and governments and majority of their population aren’t keen on global warming challenges! 

Edited by Indy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Indy said:

Yes I was quoting feet and indeed it is around 15 million cm flared. Even so the point is relevant, two major countries in Saudi & US are gaining from artificially inflated prices and those companies and governments and majority of their population aren’t keen on global warming challenges! 

Are you seriously telling me you believe it's wrong to sanction Russia for an unprovoked war of conquest of a neighbour? Because unless you believe that's the case, then the fact that every gas supplier globally, not just the US and Saudi, is selling at higher prices due to the shortage, is utterly irrelevant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Daz Sparks said:

I wonder how long before Vlad has a small mishap?

Given that Vlad seems to be completely paranoid I imagine he stays well away from tall buildings but then the Russians are quite imaginative in the range and variety of their mishaps.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Creative Midfielder said:

Given that Vlad seems to be completely paranoid I imagine he stays well away from tall buildings but then the Russians are quite imaginative in the range and variety of their mishaps.

And given that they are Olympic grade liars with gold medals in betrayal, subterfuge and disinformation, Putler has every right to be paranoid.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...