Yellow Green Army 237 Posted March 13, 2022 How many on here agree with the decision to allow that Leeds goal. Absolutely outrageous decision in my mind. Not interfering with play was the come back from VAR. Ridiculous, the reason the CB’s were running back towards their own goal was because BAMFORD was in a dangerous attacking position and was looking to get in behind. Can’t remember the CB who headed the ball out but that’s another debate in its own. VAR and these incompetent refs are sadly, slowly killing the beautiful game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cambridgeshire canary 6,716 Posted March 13, 2022 (edited) 'Look yes he was offside but was not interfering with play so the goal stands' Â Honestly could not bealive my ears, still rather confused to say the least Edited March 13, 2022 by cambridgeshire canary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kinggoblin 37 Posted March 13, 2022 As soon as we get out of this corrupt, nonsensical league the better, I would check the betting patterns of the officials if I had my way Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
canarybubbles 1,915 Posted March 13, 2022 If Rowe's shot against the bar had gone in, Pukki was in an offside position although not obstructing the goalkeeper and not  involved in the play in any way. I bet VAR would have found that he was interfering, though. Don't get me wrong, we deserved to lose. But the total randomness of VAR decisions sickens. VAR was supposed to bring science into football. Chaos theory, perhaps. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Angry 1,555 Posted March 13, 2022 Have a look at the law and decide. I don’t think he did anything that would trigger the offside decision. Less easy to understand is the decision to reverse the penalty for the challenge on Rashica.  Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kinggoblin 37 Posted March 13, 2022 All that and the fact that Ayling wasn't sent off with the foul on Rashica midway through the first half ffs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big O 225 Posted March 13, 2022 I just think it’s obvious. The Leeds defender has played a ball to Patrick Bamford, it was quite clear that he was the intended recipient of the pass. To add to this Bamford actively runs toward the Norwich goal forcing the Norwich defender to have to run back and complete a header under pressure. This is clearly attempting to play a ball. it’s just a terrible decision and one that they should not be getting wrong. The rest of the VAR decisions today are subjective but this was as clear as day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KernowCanary 214 Posted March 13, 2022 (edited) Apparently “things will even themselves out”…. well after the Villa - Sheff Utd goalline decision computer messed up in 2020, allowing Prince William FC to stay up, I refuse to believe that rubbish. Edited March 13, 2022 by KernowCanary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man 3,820 Posted March 13, 2022 I wouldn't mind them allowing this goal if there was some consistency. Allowing this one after disallowing McLean's against Leicester just makes little sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites