Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Thingy

Team v Everton

Recommended Posts

Given that Todd won't be playing I would start with:

Krul

Aarons Andrew Kabak Williams

Normann PLM

Sargent Dowell Tzolis

Pukki

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think I would try to shore up the defensive play a bit more. How about:

                         Krul

Aarons obamadellie Gibson williams

dowell Normann sorenson tzolis

                 Sargent Pukki 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Krul

Aarons Hanley Kabak Williams 

Gilmour Normann Lees-Melou

Dowell Pukki Sargent

Id stick with 433 and play what I think Farke thinks is his strongest 11 at this point. I think we have only seen this for 60 mins and if we built a window on it it needs time for players and formation to work. Mainly because I don’t believe another formation would do wildly differently.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Yellow Green Army said:

Krul

Aarons Hanley Kabak Williams

Norman Gilmour

Sargent PLM Tzolis

Pukki

Swap Williams out for giannoulis, plm out for Dowell and gilmour out for anyone 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

                         Krul

Aaron Omobamidele Kabak Williams 

                   Normann

                Gilmour  Lees-Melou 

Sargent       Pukki       Raschica 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The longer a player doesn't play the better he gets. Dowell has produced very few performances where he has warranted a place in the team, when given the chance against Arsenal he was poor. Give it another week or two without Idah playing and people will be calling for him again.

How many naturally left sided centre backs have we? Gibson is the only one I believe. Hanley usually moves over if Big Andy plays. He moved over for Kabak against Watford.  So perhaps the centre backs depend on who trained better and looks sharpest?

There are so many combinations for centre back I wouldn't be surprised at any. 

So:

Krul

Aarons Centre back Centre back Giannoulis

McLean Normann

Gilmour Sargent Tzolis 

Pukki

And as above I fully agree with going back to 4 2 3 1.

 

Edited by Yellow Wal
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, RugbyCanary said:

For what it worth.....go back to 4-2-3-1

Screenshot_20210925-100046.png

I’d go with that but Sargent I’m for Dowell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d go for that but Sargent in for Dowell to offer bit more strength and fight, also think him and Pukki could make a good partnership 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rock bus said:

I’d go for that but Sargent in for Dowell to offer bit more strength and fight, also think him and Pukki could make a good partnership 

 

34A6F7F7-B82A-4E41-930F-91D88EEC30C3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, rock bus said:

I’d go with that but Sargent I’m for Dowell

Same, plus Sorenson in for McLean, might free Normann up for some more attacking passes and McLean deserves to be dropped after last weekend. Although this formation is what he's used to so might see an improvement. 

Edited by canarydan23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like 

Krul

Aarons Omo Kabak Giannoulis

Sorenson Normann

Rashica Sargent Tzolis 

Pukki

We need to get the Gian/Tzol & Rash/Sargent partnerships going. However, I can't see Farke playing Sorenson, so expect Mclean to partner Normann instead

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After what Farke was saying about Hanley at the news conference I cannot see him not playing him together with Kabak hopefully

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The constant clamour for sorenson is pathetic and typical of the total lack of knowledge, and even having eyes and a brain, displayed so often here. 

The guy is slow, not sharp enough, and simply lacklustre. 

The clue is in farke not even benching him....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Discobolus said:

After what Farke was saying about Hanley at the news conference I cannot see him not playing him together with Kabak hopefully

Likewise Sargent. I suspect he will stick with 351 to accommodate Maclean too.

Krul, Aarons, Kabak, Hanley, Gibson, Williams, Normann, Maclean, Rashica, Sargent, Pukki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Bovril said:

You can pick your team here on the BBC website

image.png.5ad619cc1e3c92f7950601f7c20d0fe8.png

Cheers for this, never knew about it. No more sweating over how to spell Omobamidele.

Edited by Monty13
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clog the midfield for 75mins, protect the full backs, try not to concede and introduce width/guile to try and nick it at the end or grab an equaliser. And yes, I am selecting Rupp to start for early solidity!

                             Krul

Aarons     Hanley     Kabak     Giannoulis

  Rupp     PLM     Normann     McLean

                          Sargent

                            Pukki

Tzolis, Gilmour/Rashica & Idah off the bench when the game opens up after we (hopefully) haven't conceded. The game is winnable, I'd take a 0-0 at this stage; we could also get beaten 3-0! My prediction is 1-1 to get the season up & running. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, fredherring said:

The constant clamour for sorenson is pathetic and typical of the total lack of knowledge, and even having eyes and a brain, displayed so often here. 

The guy is slow, not sharp enough, and simply lacklustre. 

The clue is in farke not even benching him....

 

Why is it pathetic. You clearly know more than most on this forum?

When was he not benched, against Watford I recall he was injured, and he was on the bench against Liverpool. 

Hmm...knowledge...hmm 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, fredherring said:

The constant clamour for sorenson is pathetic and typical of the total lack of knowledge, and even having eyes and a brain, displayed so often here. 

The guy is slow, not sharp enough, and simply lacklustre. 

The clue is in farke not even benching him....

 

Please explain, therefore, why he was not sold in the summer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Persevering with a back 3 which is fine and probably a sensible choice of players.

The 2 up front is what we would like but its the middle 5 that I find odd.

Normann seems to be the defensive one but who is the 'playmaker' or 'number 10'.I really can't see McLean or PLM being that man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...