Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, lake district canary said:

It wasn't a challenge or a tackle though, it was a blatant aggressive act purely to stop the opponent. Shirt pulls are one thing, they happen a lot, but ths was a bit more than a shirt pull and if he had landed badly, could have had serious consequences.

If. Any innocuous tackle, challenge or aerial duel can have serious consequences. Chiellini's shirt pull was a tactical foul, but it was no more dangerous than dozens of any other incidents during a football match.

If you think Chiellini's pull was dangerous, I dread to think what you make of rugby. Legal tackles are more dangerous than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man said:

If. Any innocuous tackle, challenge or aerial duel can have serious consequences. Chiellini's shirt pull was a tactical foul, but it was no more dangerous than dozens of any other incidents during a football match.

If you think Chiellini's pull was dangerous, I dread to think what you make of rugby. Legal tackles are more dangerous than that.

If you did that in a rugby match, wouldn't the perpetrator be sent off for a high tackle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man said:

If. Any innocuous tackle, challenge or aerial duel can have serious consequences. Chiellini's shirt pull was a tactical foul, but it was no more dangerous than dozens of any other incidents during a football match.

If you think Chiellini's pull was dangerous, I dread to think what you make of rugby. Legal tackles are more dangerous than that.

But a scrag tackle is 10 mins in the bin - the Orange CardĀ šŸ“™

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, lake district canary said:

If you did that in a rugby match, wouldn't the perpetrator be sent off for a high tackle?

I'm not an expert on the rules of rugby but I'm fairly certain that they would, yes.

However, it wasn't my point.

Even a legal rugby tackle where a 20 stone man crashes into an opponent at waist height is more dangerous and carries a more serious risk of injury than what Chiellini did to Saka.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chiellini is one of my favourite players of the tournament. Him and Bonucci absolute monsters. Would love Hanley and GibsonĀ to dish out some of that.

Chiellini correctly booked. Can't believe VAR didn't at least check the Jorginho challenge. Straight red all day long.

Ā 

Edited by Capt. Pants
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Great Mass Debater said:

Hard to argue clear goalscoring opportunity, but Id still make the argument. We know who is o=going to win that race and so did Chiellini.

The studs up one was as bad as Danielson's imo.

I also think Sterling should have had a penalty. It was way more of a penalty than the one he actually got against Denmark

Problem is when you get a reputation for falling down easily (and diving..) refs will know about it and will ignore you meaning your legitimate claims will often end up ignored

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, cambridgeshire canary said:

Problem is when you get a reputation for falling down easily (and diving..) refs will know about it and will ignore you meaning your legitimate claims will often end up ignored

If only there was a parable involving wolves about such things...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No way was that shirt pull worthy of a red, the tackle on grealish however, that wouldā€™ve been a red every single time in the Premier League.

All that said though I thinkĀ the refereeing for the most part has been decent in this tournament. Itā€™s been quite refreshing to see a few challenges bypassed and the game allowed to flow so overall no complaints from me.

Edited by Coneys Knee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Capt. Pants said:

Chiellini is one of my favourite players of the tournament. Him and Bonucci absolute monsters. Would love Hanley and GibsonĀ to dish out some of that.

Chiellini correctly booked. Can't believe VAR didn't at least check the Jorginho challenge. Straight red all day long.

Ā 

Couldn't agree more. I love Chiellini; he is an absolute warrior and a proper defender. Bonucci, whilst being far less likeable, is also a world class player and that partnership is real throwback to an era when defenders defended first and foremost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, lake district canary said:

Well, if pulling a fast moving player forcefully down on his back isn't dangerous play, I don't know what is.

Then you don't know what is then šŸ˜‰

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, cambridgeshire canary said:

Problem is when you get a reputation for falling down easily (and diving..) refs will know about it and will ignore you meaning your legitimate claims will often end up ignored

Although with VAR that shouldn't really therefore be an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think the Jorginho tackle was saved somewhat by the fact his foot slipped off the ball a bit. If he missed the ball its just a stamp but as he does he can claim the contact wouldn't have happened like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, king canary said:

i think the Jorginho tackle was saved somewhat by the fact his foot slipped off the ball a bit. If he missed the ball its just a stamp but as he does he can claim the contact wouldn't have happened like that.

Exactly that. Clips ball first, can't do anything but inadvertently hit Grealish, and then an awkward landing afterwards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, king canary said:

i think the Jorginho tackle was saved somewhat by the fact his foot slipped off the ball a bit. If he missed the ball its just a stamp but as he does he can claim the contact wouldn't have happened like that.

That was what undoubtedly saved him, but it shouldn't really make a difference because entering a tackle in that manner is a red card nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Man said:

That was what undoubtedly saved him, but it shouldn't really make a difference because entering a tackle in that manner is a red card nowadays.

I totally agree that going into the tackle with studs on top of the ball gave him no chance of actually winning the ball, and a massive high percentage chance of injuring the player. It was dangerous play for me and out of control. Very surprised VAR didnā€™t take a look.
Ā 

Overall I felt the referee was incredible inconsistent, but inconsistent to both teams. When the referee wasnā€™t giving those small fouls to either Sterling or Kane the game plan for those players appeared in tatters. Sterling in particular.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Italy are masters of this type of foul. Never bad enough to merit a red card but I feel there is a case for taking into account the cummulative team total of such fouls. That or issuing yellow cards more frequently so the odds on double yellow red cards increase. Unless refs clamp down on these persistentĀ niggly fouls teams like Italy will carry on. Having said this Italy were worthy winners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, WD40 said:

I totally agree that going into the tackle with studs on top of the ball gave him no chance of actually winning the ball, and a massive high percentage chance of injuring the player. It was dangerous play for me and out of control. Very surprised VAR didnā€™t take a look.
Ā 

Overall I felt the referee was incredible inconsistent, but inconsistent to both teams. When the referee wasnā€™t giving those small fouls to either Sterling or Kane the game plan for those players appeared in tatters. Sterling in particular.Ā 

Consistently inconsistent?!Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Greavsy said:

Consistently inconsistent?!Ā 

Paradoxically, yes!

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, lake district canary said:

Anyone take the view that his challenge on Saka was worthy of a red card? In my view that was pretty violent as it sent Saka crashing down on his back.Ā  The tackle on Grealish with studs up was a definite red card too.

It was a yellow in accordance with the rules.

Professional foul, not the last man.Ā 

Clever player, knew it was worth the yellow.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TeemuVanBasten said:

It was a yellow in accordance with the rules.

Professional foul, not the last man.Ā 

Clever player, knew it was worth the yellow.

Agreed. Hence the terms 'professional foul'Ā  as you say & also 'Taking one for the team'Ā 

Edited by Greavsy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Crafty Canary said:

Italy are masters of this type of foul. Never bad enough to merit a red card but I feel there is a case for taking into account the cummulative team total of such fouls. That or issuing yellow cards more frequently so the odds on double yellow red cards increase. Unless refs clamp down on these persistentĀ niggly fouls teams like Italy will carry on. Having said this Italy were worthy winners.

There already is, it's called "persistent infringement" - doesn't just apply to players. By that, I mean it can easily be applied to the whole team to stop the age-old tactic of several different players on one side lining up to foul a specific player on the other.

Edited by TheGunnShow

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does persistent infringement apply to teams as a whole, or just players (possibly more than one)Ā as individuals ? (if you see what I mean)

Ā 

Edited by Greavsy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, king canary said:

i think the Jorginho tackle was saved somewhat by the fact his foot slipped off the ball a bit. If he missed the ball its just a stamp but as he does he can claim the contact wouldn't have happened like that.

Yep totally agree, it's what I said to my mate in the pub last night when he's screaming for a red.Ā 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Greavsy said:

Does persistent infringement apply to teams as a whole, or just players (possibly more than one)Ā as individuals ? (if you see what I mean)

Ā 

In theory, yes. As I said in my previous comment, it's also an option if you get the situation where several players on a team decide to spread the fouling amongst them, usually when focusing on one player in particular. Alternatively, it can be if a few players from the same team start fouling in fairly quick order too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TheGunnShow said:

In theory, yes. As I said in my previous comment, it's also an option if you get the situation where several players on a team decide to spread the fouling amongst them, usually when focusing on one player in particular. Alternatively, it can be if a few players from the same team start fouling in fairly quick order too.

I suppose an example would be the Copa America final on Saturday, where four Argentinian players were booked for going in hard on Neymar.

I think fouls on Neymar should be punished rather more leniently, but I guess that's a different subject for another day.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Until we get nasty like Italy, we will never win anything. While we have Sterling falling down at every opportunity and getting the ref believing he is diving, an Italian falls down holding his face in extreme pain. Then he gets his team mates to surround the ref with that pleading gesture that the chap is near death.

Then straightaway Chielini will cynically I would say wrench Saka's shirt and just get a booking while he gets his team mates to using the pleading gesture proclaiming Mrs Chielini's little boy wouldn't harm a fly.

Rugby is trying hard to stamp it out while many say its part of the game. Football appears to want to ignore foul play hence the foul on Grealish being deemed just a yellow. Jorginho's studs were showing went went for the tackle and luckily he got the ball square on or might have put Grealish out of the game.

You can be sent off for kicking the ball away, yellow card and then taking your shirt off in celebration, yellow card.

Football isn't even trying.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...