Jump to content
A Load of Squit

New Tory Leader

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Herman said:

£163000 spent on flags. 😮

Presumably supplied by one of Johnson's chums at grossly inflated prices?

Although can't have been a very good chum otherwise they'd have got in on the multi-million PPE or Track and Trace scams.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Well b back said:

Bet this wouldn’t work if we told TT to f*** off. One rule for Johnson and the rest of us can just f*** themselves. Seems as well this is yet another lie as he says no close contact, witnesses say there was, he makes himself look a bigger clown by the day.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-58123017

Yep, you wouldn't have thought it possible but somehow he keeps managing it - he's too thick to even recognise when he's on a sticky wicket such as encouraging fans to boo the England team or https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-58117044  don't think he's has a clue about how his odious and incredibly stupid remarks about coal mines have landed in former coal mining areas.

I'm afraid old Stanley must have wasted a fortune on Johnson's Eton fees - not even Eton can deliver unless a certain level of raw material is there to work with and in Boris Johnson's case it clearly isn't there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Creative Midfielder said:

I'm afraid old Stanley must have wasted a fortune on Johnson's Eton fees - not even Eton can deliver unless a certain level of raw material is there to work with and in Boris Johnson's case it clearly isn't there.

Johnson's fees were paid for via scholarship - not his family. Which is said to contribute to his sense of superiority. As he was there on merit, not money.

Unfortunately, this failure to grasp his very obvious limitations led to

Johnson is a fraud and a charlatan, with all the depth of a half inch puddle and the sincerity of an estate agent.

He hides behind a carefully crafted projection of being a 'character'... which requires him to take considerable time over his appearance, in order to make himself look unkempt. The latin quotes are no more than the same ploy used by Enoch Powell - well rehearsed before being dropped into conversation as if he were fluent in the classics.

That stupid people are fooled by him is no great shock. Jeffrey Archer was adored by the bigoted faithful - until the mask and cloak were removed (another charlatan and shyster). Similarly, Jimmy Savile was able to carry off a persona of being a harmless, even lovable, eccentric.

That there has been so many about turns, as well as gaffes, is testament to the perception of his former housemaster. Johnson has neither the intellect, nor the ability to see beyond his own self delusion. Unaware of how out of step he is with current thinking, or the reality of any given topic. His is a world where time is better spent on writing a joke than studying 'his brief'. A classic case of the line 'some of my best ad libs..... took months to write'.

And it is to that end the Archbishop of Yorks comments are aimed at... sort of. Blaming those who can see through Johnson's act, for alienating those who cannot, or will not. Much the same line was trotted about the so called 'remainers' and their sneering attitude towards brexiteers - one which supposedly drove Brexiteers into the arms of Farage - rather than it being his crude use of naked racism and xenophobia. Which when considered is a tacit acknowledgement of the stupidity of brexit, if not why then the comment on remainers attitude. Likewise with the Hartlepool by election where voters allegedly wanted to punish Labour............ for not doing enough to protect them from a decade of Tory austerity.

However, It all does all smack of a need to distract from the real cause - those who have consistently lied about brexit, their intentions towards the NHS and funding of social provision in general. It is not us, the old Etonians, the MPs lining their pockets through corruption and the friends in the City. It is the newly named 'woke' - who through such things as Black Lives Matter, gay marriage and environmental concerns have caused your woes.

And who better to put over this misrepresentation of the truth, than a man who has spent his whole adult life misrepresenting the truth (lying).

An expert in his field.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Bill
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, horsefly said:

Another racist jibe to add to Johnson's list:

"Downing Street aides who were present said the PM went “f***ing tonto”."

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15808660/boris-johnson-threatened-to-sack-rishi-sunak/

Interesting question as to whether Johnson could actually sack Sunak even if he really wanted to - I would think probably not, not without losing his own job anyway 😃

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Creative Midfielder said:

Interesting question as to whether Johnson could actually sack Sunak even if he really wanted to - I would think probably not, not without losing his own job anyway 😃

It's been mentioned before but the funny thing was Sunak was put in as a puppet of Cummings and Johnson. One now doesn't have a job and t'other is far less popular.😀. Pair of twats.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Van wink said:

Totally agree. Read this first thing this morning. A very decent insight into exceptionalism and the hollowness underneath. Then comes the little shock to the system to realise what Cameron and Johnson have done to this country. But all the while they rarely live to realise it but if they do they don't care.

Marie Louise Von Franz authored a book called Puer Aeternus which describes the psychological characteristics of the young boy / man that never grows up. To grow up would mean death (psychologically). We have a cabinet full of Puer Aeternae. Frightening truly how people vote for such incomplete individuals.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000yprm/panorama-david-cameron-and-the-missing-billions

That a former Tory prime minister of this country should prioritise his rapacious personal greed above the dignity of his former office perhaps explains why the current government is so riddled with corrupt ministers and politicians at every level.  It seems the first question is, "How much do I get?", and only then is it enquired, "What do you want me to do?". 

That Cameron thinks it an adequate response that, "I was not aware of any corruption at Greensill" speaks volumes. He sat in on board meetings, and travelled the world as an ex-PM of the UK encouraging investors to put billions into a corrupt company, yet tells us he was not remotely aware of, or interested in finding out, how that company was financing its operations. That he then stalked Sunak and co with multiple texts and calls begging for hundreds of millions of UK taxpayer's cash to prop up the corrupt company is virtually beyond moral comprehension. The man is an utterly, utterly shameless ars*hole.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, horsefly said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000yprm/panorama-david-cameron-and-the-missing-billions

That a former Tory prime minister of this country should prioritise his rapacious personal greed above the dignity of his former office perhaps explains why the current government is so riddled with corrupt ministers and politicians at every level.  It seems the first question is, "How much do I get?", and only then is it enquired, "What do you want me to do?". 

That Cameron thinks it an adequate response that, "I was not aware of any corruption at Greensill" speaks volumes. He sat in on board meetings, and travelled the world as an ex-PM of the UK encouraging investors to put billions into a corrupt company, yet tells us he was not remotely aware of, or interested in finding out, how that company was financing its operations. That he then stalked Sunak and co with multiple texts and calls begging for hundreds of millions of UK taxpayer's cash to prop up the corrupt company is virtually beyond moral comprehension. The man is an utterly, utterly shameless ars*hole.

And a Parliamentary committee has said he didn't break the code. Its not in code, ask for a copy of the Panorama programme.

Whoops, forgot, the BBC is just a bunch of Marxists.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More Cameron sleaze:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/david-cameron-won-illumina-123m-deal-after-sending-matt-hancock-begging-letter-smf8q7nl3?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=cc&utm_medium=branded_social

Illumina won £123m deal after David Cameron wrote to Matt Hancock

And:

 
 
ULkR08Er_bigger.png
 
Replying to
It has also emerged that Cameron attended a meeting with vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi to discuss Illumina’s genomics sequencing work in March The company was subsequently awarded contracts worth up to £870,000 The government denies contracts were discussed at the meeting
 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Many countries either are or intend to trial the four day working week (one of Maggie's pledges for the future).

Our Government say they have no intention at this stage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, horsefly said:

More Cameron sleaze:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/david-cameron-won-illumina-123m-deal-after-sending-matt-hancock-begging-letter-smf8q7nl3?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=cc&utm_medium=branded_social

Illumina won £123m deal after David Cameron wrote to Matt Hancock

And:

 
 
ULkR08Er_bigger.png
 
Replying to
It has also emerged that Cameron attended a meeting with vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi to discuss Illumina’s genomics sequencing work in March The company was subsequently awarded contracts worth up to £870,000 The government denies contracts were discussed at the meeting
 
 

Well, they would wouldn't they? 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Creative Midfielder said:

Well, they would wouldn't they? 🤣

Indeed! But let's be honest, they tend not to discuss blatant corruption at such meetings when it's so much more convenient to do it via much more secretive WhatsApp groups. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, horsefly said:

Indeed! But let's be honest, they tend not to discuss blatant corruption at such meetings when it's so much more convenient to do it via much more secretive WhatsApp groups. 

Ello Jun, wanta nu mowta?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Government hypocrisy continues apace:

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/former-taxpayers-alliance-boss-handed-taxpayer-funded-job-by-priti-patel/ar-AANf6Sh?ocid=msedgntp

Former Taxpayers’ Alliance boss handed taxpayer-funded job by Priti Patel

In his previous role at the TaxPayers’ Alliance, Mr Isaby had criticised government spending on communications staff – attacking “unnecessary” PR jobs in the NHS.

A 2015 TaxPayers’ Alliance report condemned “the emergence of a growing class of “spin-doctors” and their remit goes beyond the basic requirements of government communication”.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Teflon Man just keeps on bouncing.

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+2)
LAB: 33% (-1)
LDEM: 8% (-)
GRN: 7% (-2)
REFUK: 3% (-)

via @YouGov
, 05 - 06 Aug
Chgs. w/ 29 Jul

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, ricardo said:

The Teflon Man just keeps on bouncing.

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+2)
LAB: 33% (-1)
LDEM: 8% (-)
GRN: 7% (-2)
REFUK: 3% (-)

via @YouGov
, 05 - 06 Aug
Chgs. w/ 29 Jul

Very selective, if renowned, poll. Others give Labour more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Herman said:

Did you not see the Redfield poll Ricardo? 😀 o

Heres another one hot off the press.

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+1)
LAB: 33% (-1)
LDEM: 10% (-)
GRN: 4% (-2)

via @SavantaComRes
, 06 - 08 Aug
Chgs. w/ 01 Aug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Must be frustrating for Starmer to see his opponent keep getting back up again. There's no accounting for it but they just seem to like Boris.🤔

Must be the haircut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 08/08/2021 at 00:25, Bill said:

Johnson's fees were paid for via scholarship - not his family. Which is said to contribute to his sense of superiority. As he was there on merit, not money.

Unfortunately, this failure to grasp his very obvious limitations led to

Johnson is a fraud and a charlatan, with all the depth of a half inch puddle and the sincerity of an estate agent.

He hides behind a carefully crafted projection of being a 'character'... which requires him to take considerable time over his appearance, in order to make himself look unkempt. The latin quotes are no more than the same ploy used by Enoch Powell - well rehearsed before being dropped into conversation as if he were fluent in the classics.

That stupid people are fooled by him is no great shock. Jeffrey Archer was adored by the bigoted faithful - until the mask and cloak were removed (another charlatan and shyster). Similarly, Jimmy Savile was able to carry off a persona of being a harmless, even lovable, eccentric.

That there has been so many about turns, as well as gaffes, is testament to the perception of his former housemaster. Johnson has neither the intellect, nor the ability to see beyond his own self delusion. Unaware of how out of step he is with current thinking, or the reality of any given topic. His is a world where time is better spent on writing a joke than studying 'his brief'. A classic case of the line 'some of my best ad libs..... took months to write'.

And it is to that end the Archbishop of Yorks comments are aimed at... sort of. Blaming those who can see through Johnson's act, for alienating those who cannot, or will not. Much the same line was trotted about the so called 'remainers' and their sneering attitude towards brexiteers - one which supposedly drove Brexiteers into the arms of Farage - rather than it being his crude use of naked racism and xenophobia. Which when considered is a tacit acknowledgement of the stupidity of brexit, if not why then the comment on remainers attitude. Likewise with the Hartlepool by election where voters allegedly wanted to punish Labour............ for not doing enough to protect them from a decade of Tory austerity.

However, It all does all smack of a need to distract from the real cause - those who have consistently lied about brexit, their intentions towards the NHS and funding of social provision in general. It is not us, the old Etonians, the MPs lining their pockets through corruption and the friends in the City. It is the newly named 'woke' - who through such things as Black Lives Matter, gay marriage and environmental concerns have caused your woes.

And who better to put over this misrepresentation of the truth, than a man who has spent his whole adult life misrepresenting the truth (lying).

An expert in his field.

 

 

 

 

Only fair to point out that Enoch Powell was intellectually quite a powerhouse though - indeed even my old history teacher, who said of himself that he was a bona-fide Communist, said that whilst the Tories didn't tend to have many great intellects in their ranks, Powell was certainly one.

IIRC didn't he double-star both his Latin and Greek exams and generally have quite a flair for languages?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, ricardo said:

Heres another one hot off the press.

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+1)
LAB: 33% (-1)
LDEM: 10% (-)
GRN: 4% (-2)

via @SavantaComRes
, 06 - 08 Aug
Chgs. w/ 01 Aug

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, ricardo said:

Must be frustrating for Starmer to see his opponent keep getting back up again. There's no accounting for it but they just seem to like Boris.🤔

Must be the haircut.

The fat lump isn't that popular and neither is Starmer. Both need to up their game.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, ricardo said:

Heres another one hot off the press.

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+1)
LAB: 33% (-1)
LDEM: 10% (-)
GRN: 4% (-2)

via @SavantaComRes
, 06 - 08 Aug
Chgs. w/ 01 Aug

perhaps we could be shown where the bloated buffoons poll ratings are in that poll

or

"His overall approval rating has fallen to -16, down from the -13 he recorded two weeks ago and -8 a fortnight before that. It is even lower than the -15 he recorded back in January, when Britain was in the grip of a Covid peak, lockdown measures were in place and the NHS was under severe pressure." 7th Aug

While the party polls continue to fluctuate within a pretty static range, fatboy has been on a steady slide for a while

perhaps it is his lies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, TheGunnShow said:

Only fair to point out that Enoch Powell was intellectually quite a powerhouse though - indeed even my old history teacher, who said of himself that he was a bona-fide Communist, said that whilst the Tories didn't tend to have many great intellects in their ranks, Powell was certainly one.

IIRC didn't he double-star both his Latin and Greek exams and generally have quite a flair for languages?

Intellectual perhaps, intelligent not

Drop Latin and Greek quotes into your conversation when you know those listening have not the same knowledge, is merely behaving as De;boy with his use of French.....to impress.

Johnson does much the same, only his very limited knowledge is based on swatting up before, so he can pass of his 'ad lib' as an example of his thorough knowledge. And an example of why a learned man like him should not be troubled by the requirements of others ie honesty, trustworthiness and a reasonable degree of integrity.

Powell failed because he spent more time under the bonnet that he did driving. Learning Urdu because he expected to be made governor of India, does not speak of a flair for languages, so much as a man out of touch with reality. That failing was what ultimately 'did for him', as it will Johnson.

Politics requires many skills, most of which Powell lacked

A highly educated idiot, which at least it could be said he was highly educated, something Johnson clearly is not. He is merely an idiot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...