Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
nevermind, neoliberalism has had it

freedom of speech as practiced by very few journalists

Recommended Posts

It seems ironic that youtube, fakebook, blogsites, foxnews and 80% of the British press is filled with RWNJs whining about a lack of freedom of speech.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 26/03/2021 at 11:17, A Load of Squit said:

OK, I looked him up & he shares the same terrible views about women that Paul has. He was reprimanded and finally left the BBC after making lewd comments about a weather presenter, he used the terms 'hotties' and 'slappers' when describing women in the news.

He's a 24 carat RWNJ.

 

He’s also the guy that did Jimmy Saville’s last interview and laughed and joked with his ‘ mate  Jimmy ‘ when he told him how ‘ he got away with it ‘. He also denied COVID. I have for a while suspected mad Moy was previously known as Teemu’s Right Foot ‘ and strangely he constantly put up snip it’s from this guy and that Mike Yeadon. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, paul moy said:

All kicking off..... :

 

It would kick off if I ever met this guy who protected Jimmy Saville laughing and joking with him as he said ‘ I think I got away with it ‘.

I guess you agree that the police should never have been allowed to harass poor old Jimmy.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A small time local radio guy claiming the BBC wants him dead while calling himself the Voice of Reason and grifting for PayPal donations.

I'm sure everything he says is fully trustworthy.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, nevermind, neoliberalism has had it said:

the bbc does not do free speech, they regurgitate as for that slime they fired, good riddance.

Another thread diverted by Moy slapping himself.

This works much better if there is a comma after 'regurgitate'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets hope that this excellent article and critic of the current lack of will for Independence inside the SNP leadership will find its way into the mainstream press. OOps just saw a couple of piggies fly past.

Who would have thought it, the SNP is asking MI5 to assist with their aim to scupper Independence.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/04/the-strange-convulsion-in-scottish-politics/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This Friday Craig will be sentenced for contempt of court. He will be the fall guy, although he did not mention one for the complainants/perjurers by name, he will be punished for all the other journalist who did mention names, such as Dani Gravelli and Kirsty Wark.

There is no test for jigsaw identification except in the three judges minds, they can cobble it up as they see fit, not forgetting that they all do know the names and are 'involved' in the pre conception they claim Craig has put into people's mind.

Craig has repeated his public poll and the results are stark. Looks like he will take this further as he has done nothing at all. This nothing at all resulted in the judges charging him over 160.000 so far, trying to shut him up by bankrupting him.

Should any of you feel that free speech needs support I thank you in advance for donating to his defence appeal.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/05/appeal-for-defence-funds/comment-page-1/#comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

words fail me and the stark reality of a failed justice system, not to speak of the racialist and pro establishment status quo policing, has failed us all. My good friend Craig Murray is about to be jailed for something he has not done, a result of more persecution justice from another woman judge hoping for promotion.

This is an article By Kirsten Mac Donald, for Craig Murray, about the moves to deprive us all of a jury of our very own peers in future, of trials decided by unelected judges who are serving the Government of the day. the establishment and themselves.

Roland Freisler seems to have been the model judge to follow going by Lady Dorrian and Mrs. Baraitser. If anybody should have a court appearance in future, please consider the option of a cangaroo suit to wear.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/craig-murrays-trial-what-happens-next/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, nevermind, neoliberalism has had it said:

words fail me and the stark reality of a failed justice system, not to speak of the racialist and pro establishment status quo policing, has failed us all. My good friend Craig Murray is about to be jailed for something he has not done, a result of more persecution justice from another woman judge hoping for promotion.

This is an article By Kirsten Mac Donald, for Craig Murray, about the moves to deprive us all of a jury of our very own peers in future, of trials decided by unelected judges who are serving the Government of the day. the establishment and themselves.

Roland Freisler seems to have been the model judge to follow going by Lady Dorrian and Mrs. Baraitser. If anybody should have a court appearance in future, please consider the option of a cangaroo suit to wear.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/craig-murrays-trial-what-happens-next/

Yes, the principle does seem wrong, doesn't it? Essentially, someone can accuse you of a crime, the courts find you are not guilty of the accusations made, but the accusers get to hide their identity. I could understand that with certain crimes of a personal nature it might be right to withhold the accuser's names before and during the trial and after if there was a guilty verdict, but not when there is a not guilty verdict returned. The court claimed that revealing the identity would discourage accusers coming forward in other cases, but then how about the need to discourage false accusers from coming forward? That point is not addressed.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have listened in to today' s  proceedings, another two judges and their top judge Lady Dorrian, postponing the date of when Craig should be jailed by another day. Tomorrow at 10 am he will be informed of their decision via a letter.

This letter was written by Nadira, Craigs wife and mother of his last two children, it explains that Craigs past matter as much as the made up political biased charge of contempt. Jigsaw identification is not something they have a test for and you cannot identify the full picture from one single piece. but  the naming of complainants by Kirsty Wark and Dani Garavelli provided much identity to some of the accusing perjurers.

Lady Dorrian will rue the day she accused Craig of this weird undertaking, she, knowing the names and deeds of the complainants in this politically motivated trial, should have excused herself letting a different judge handle it, she was part of the jigsaw herself.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/an-open-letter-to-lady-dorrian/comment-page-1/#comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the Saga continues as the FCO's youngest and most promising ambassador is hung out to dry. Lady Dorrian is now trying to make out that those online journalists not employed by moguls such as Murdoch are not 'approved'/accredited journalists before the law.

She is trying to put a wedge between those paid online for what they write and those who write for paid for newspapers, exactly what Levenson rejected. Craig was refused leave to appeal to the supreme court but given enough time to bring an appeal. She is rightly confused and her actions speak volumes.

This is another of Craigs transparent actions. An email to his legal team pointing out the discrepancies of his persecutors who clearly have a femi political bias under their bonnet. Enjoy

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/official-lady-dorrian-rules-courts-should-apply-different-standards-to-bloggers-and-mainstream-media/comment-page-1/#comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You would think 'professional' journalists would be held to a higher standard and not the other way around. 

Though it really demonstrates why laws should apply to everyone equally and not selectively. 

There is a similar case in Australia where an online journalist, Avi Yemeni, who does have proper journalistic credentials gets visited by the police at home and warned not to report on certain events or face arrest, while mainstream journalists receive no such threats. 

This is a worldwide attack on freedom of speech. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its quiet amazing how much twaddle about the non event in Cornwall we had to take from our war mongering puppets. Another fine and well written article by Craig Murray, how does he do this, whilst facing jail and being persecuted by the courts in Scotland.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/the-decline-of-western-power/comment-page-1/#comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 

In this plandemically challenged time of politics and emergency legislation it is inevitable that mental instabilities of us all are brought to the fore, in all wakes of society, so the more we realise that this judgement by Lady Dorrian could easily be construed as a biased and deeply flawed judgement.

Did the emotional moments of Nicola giving evidence to the Scottish parliamentary inquiry and the lack of conviction of Alex Salmond in his court case, with Craig daring to report from the case, send here of the acceptability threshold? Has she, as so many other lawmakers in cahoots with Government up there, hallo ex chief advocate Woolfe, lost her ability to see straight?

Or was it the report she was writing at the time for the Scottish Government on how to stop real victims of sexual abuse, apparently the reason for the 10 weeks delay in this jigsaw identification case, why ever did they not use the word scrabble identification as it clearly is talking about people being identified by random, sole letters of the alphabet, the reason for her confusion. She is envisaging to remove jury's from all sexual cases and have them heard by lawyers like her, only. IShe also envisages to rescind the right of people to fend for themselves in court against such charges and challenging the evidence by questioning the alleged victims. A new way of trial which, if it was in place or applicable retrospectively, could have had AS convicted without a majority womens jury setting him free.

Was she angry with Craig for his excellent reporting from court, when the corpo-rat media was laying into Alex Salmond calling him all sorts, with Kirsty Wark, Sky news and Dani Garavelli actually naming two of the complainants, a personal reaction to the jury throwing out her case for lack of evidence and the failure of complainants to speak the truth.

Or was she used by politicians and magistrate judges such as Mrs. Baraitser, Julian Assanges current nemesis, to ensure that Craig gets a lesson for daring to report of whats happening in court, a man who has no crux with neoliberal back scratching or reporting? 

Reporting like we have seen over the Manchester bombing, whitewashing the emergency/Intelligence services and failure at every stage in that emergency.  Reporting that ran along with the fatuous lies of the South Yorkshire police and rewritten evidence in the Hillsborough inquiry, Not to speak of the damning evidence of police inaction in the Daniel Morgan case, a history of continuing criminal corruption in the Metropolitan police. What I'm trying to say is that there is an agenda to protect a rotten judiciary and police force which upholds the misdemeanors of an established ruling class that does not like journalists to interrupt their machinations and political mongering.

a good article written for Craig by Kirsten Mac Donald

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/the-mind-of-lady-dorrian/comment-page-1/#comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nevermind, neoliberalism has had it said:

In this plandemically challenged time of politics and emergency legislation it is inevitable that mental instabilities of us all are brought to the fore, in all wakes of society, so the more we realise that this judgement by Lady Dorrian could easily be construed as a biased and deeply flawed judgement.

Did the emotional moments of Nicola giving evidence to the Scottish parliamentary inquiry and the lack of conviction of Alex Salmond in his court case, with Craig daring to report from the case, send here of the acceptability threshold? Has she, as so many other lawmakers in cahoots with Government up there, hallo ex chief advocate Woolfe, lost her ability to see straight?

Or was it the report she was writing at the time for the Scottish Government on how to stop real victims of sexual abuse, apparently the reason for the 10 weeks delay in this jigsaw identification case, why ever did they not use the word scrabble identification as it clearly is talking about people being identified by random, sole letters of the alphabet, the reason for her confusion. She is envisaging to remove jury's from all sexual cases and have them heard by lawyers like her, only. IShe also envisages to rescind the right of people to fend for themselves in court against such charges and challenging the evidence by questioning the alleged victims. A new way of trial which, if it was in place or applicable retrospectively, could have had AS convicted without a majority womens jury setting him free.

Was she angry with Craig for his excellent reporting from court, when the corpo-rat media was laying into Alex Salmond calling him all sorts, with Kirsty Wark, Sky news and Dani Garavelli actually naming two of the complainants, a personal reaction to the jury throwing out her case for lack of evidence and the failure of complainants to speak the truth.

Or was she used by politicians and magistrate judges such as Mrs. Baraitser, Julian Assanges current nemesis, to ensure that Craig gets a lesson for daring to report of whats happening in court, a man who has no crux with neoliberal back scratching or reporting? 

Reporting like we have seen over the Manchester bombing, whitewashing the emergency/Intelligence services and failure at every stage in that emergency.  Reporting that ran along with the fatuous lies of the South Yorkshire police and rewritten evidence in the Hillsborough inquiry, Not to speak of the damning evidence of police inaction in the Daniel Morgan case, a history of continuing criminal corruption in the Metropolitan police. What I'm trying to say is that there is an agenda to protect a rotten judiciary and police force which upholds the misdemeanors of an established ruling class that does not like journalists to interrupt their machinations and political mongering.

a good article written for Craig by Kirsten Mac Donald

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/the-mind-of-lady-dorrian/comment-page-1/#comments

You raise many fundamental points, Nevermind. I wish more people would address them. Unfortunately, there seems to be a reasoning that if it doesn't affect our side, whatever our side is, then we are not interested. Whereas the truth is it affects all sides in the long term when certain basic principles are compromised. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep! Hard to believe there are actually people who post on this site who would take away the freedom of speech of footballers to spend a few seconds to take the knee to express their solidarity with fellow footballers of colour. Shocking isn't it, how some people are willing to advocate revoking free speech in the cause of their side (racism).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guess what... All the croc tears of Biden over poor Navalny and that Asov Brigade agent provocateur Protasevich, as well as the assorted western Corpo-Rat-Media of late, the whining and bohoo of rightwing journos that they can't get a word in edgeways/unable to persuade us of needing them, the brazen and callous actions of our non caring politicians, 'gosh were did we leave that care Act/Mental health care act/nurses pay/ busting the triple lock', for all that whining I have only got one answer.

Guess what... Julian Assange is still in max. security detention in Belmarsh, three years after being violently pulled out of the Ecudorian embassy for daring to object to the UK/US WAR CRIMES IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/assange-is-still-in-jail/

Biden was never going to do anything to disrupt the corrupt military industrial complex and the interest of the US 1%, he would be gone within a year, by any method they deem adequate. He was the advocate and campaigner for the Democrats right wing policy drive long before the Clintons came into power and he is not going to be fair to anyone. It suits him to see Julian shut away in Belmarsh and it suits Kamala to see immigrant children in camps, she always was a hardliner who imprisoned a woman for not sending her disabled child to school,  an unholy coalition of right wing Democrats who call/think themselves to be on the socialist left spectrum.

This spectrum is full of BS hypocrisy and sable rattling, badmouthing China and using little pawns like Navalny to whine over.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How best to get some cracking publicity for a naval NATO maneuver in the Black sea? Hmm leys see. First ensure that the right BBC correspondent and a camera man are aboard a suitably named modern warship, safe in the thought that some 32 other warships are with you, and then break the international law of 'innocent passage' with footage of 'action station, loading of guns with real munitions and some moans about life firing exercises announced by Russia last April.

Its called war mongering

Screenshot-1612.png

Not that anybody would want to write something about the expansionary zeal of a NATO clearly morphing into an attack dog, rather than a defense pact.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/06/warmongering-british-actions-in-the-black-sea/comment-page-1/#comments

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This morning, Craig Murray presented himself to police Scotland to be jailed on trumped up charges by an angry judge Leeona Dorrian. He is the first person to be imprisoned ever for 'jigsaw identification'. Lady  Dorrian lied when she said that CM 'relished identifying the complainers, when it was she herself who eluded to one of them in the Spectator case. Regardless of Kirstie Wark/the BBC and or Sky tv's expose of two of these complainers, it is only CM who was prosecuted, with evidence to the MSM complicity clearly shown in a poll of 5000, some 89% of people asked identified the MSM as providing evidence to the identity, not Craig on his blog.

This untenable situation will today and in future be expressed by many and a crowdfunder is to be set up to fight this unjust revenge/seeking of promotion by an unaccountable unbalanced judge in the EU courts, as the Westmonster Supreme court rejected his appeal to his incarceration.

https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-systems-revenge/

Please be aware that tomorrow's kill the Bill demonstration against the draconian laws proposed to 'reform', sic, the police and crime bill to outlaw loud environmental and other protests will be a good opportunity to make a stand against his jail sentence.

Lady Dorrian is ambitious and wants to replace Lord Carloway as Lord president of the court of sessions, writes Rev. Stu Cambell on his blog.

In his last two paragraphs he says'

If you’re a woman in Scotland and someone has raped or sexually assaulted you, Lady Dorrian has just made it far more dangerous for you to go to the police, because journalists – or at least, those journalists not loyal to the state – will now have to very seriously consider naming you immediately purely as a self-protection precaution.

Today is a terrible day for Craig Murray, for journalism, for freedom of speech, for accountability, and for the integrity and reputation of Scottish justice. But it’s also a terrible day for victims of sexual assault and rape, and for that everyone involved, from the First Minister and her fellow conspirators down, should hang their heads forever in shame.

Well I wish her and those complainers as the complicit Government, that the sovereign people of Scotland will sort you out one day for daring to imprison innocent journalists for being careful and concerned about what they publish.

And here she is, Mrs. Revenge, who wants to dispense with jury's in all trials of sexual accusations, one wonders why, she was not very successful in the past.

 

https://wingsoverscotland.com/lady-dorrians-law/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An excellent article about this wretched decision by Lady Leviathan Dorrian who wants to get rid of having to listen to jury's of our peers, a long and hard won practice for hundreds of years.

https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2021-07-30/craig-murrays-jailing-is-the-latest-move-in-the-battle-to-snuff-out-independent-journalism/

Craigs site will now be going dark as he is not allowed to run a business and or blog whilst in prison. This morning 11am he will be presenting himself to St. Leonards police station in Edinburgh to be jailed for contempt of court.

This is his last blog post before this journalist and human rights campaigner is being punished after a long winded political persecution.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2021/08/keeping-freedom-alive/

Just to add that his fight will not end there, this is the site for contact and contributions to his appeal to the supreme court/EU court of justice.

https://craigmurrayjustice.org.uk/index.php/the-case-against-craig-murray/

Edited by nevermind, neoliberalism has had it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody seems to be concerned that Lady Dorrians judgement has split journalism/free speech, making the corporate compliant media able to get away with naming the yet to be judged perjurers who were found winging by a majority jury of their peers, whilst bloggers who jump through hoops and over hurdles to comply with IPSO code clause 11, can be taken down and send to jail for contempt of court.

Nobody in the NUJ or the the great unwashed MSM has the guts to even point out this horrendous implication this judgement has for journalism on the whole. Lets go back nearly a hundred years and look at the brave journalists who voiced their opposition to Hitler, Martin Gruber, Erhard Auer, Edmund Goldschagg, Julius Zerfass and others. They were the reporters and editors of the Munich Post, who faced – and, later, met – imprisonment, concentration camps, and systematic genocide.

There is nobody making any noises about the implications to free speech today.

Shame on journalism, the NUJ and those compliant and happy with the anonymity of perjurers have nothing for us normal wits.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/craig-murrays-jailing-latest-move-battle-snuff-out-independent-journalism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kenny Macaskil, MSP for East Lothian and a former Justice minister wrote an article in 'the Scotsman' calling the judgement against Craig Murray 'vindictive'. Well, if it is vindictive, is it also malicious?

 

https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/craig-murrays-eight-month-prison-sentence-is-vindictive-and-a-sad-day-for-scottish-justice-kenny-macaskill-3332548

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Craig is now in prison for two weeks and he is able to receive post. The campaign to free his name in this vindictive political prison sentence and stop the precedent it sets for all bloggers and alternative news media, will carry on to the EUHRcourts, once all means here have been exhausted.

Craig has been denied to wear civilian cloth to meet his visiting family/ children, whilst he is allowed to wear it in his cell. He asked to get a tag release application and or date and was denied something other prisoners who'd done severe crimes are considered for.

here is his campaign site for those who understand the issues involved, who might consider supporting free speech. Take care with what you write.

https://craigmurrayjustice.org.uk/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Craig has now sat in jail for a quarter of his political prison sentence, should he get the usual reduction for being a good boy in there.

They have denied him stamps, as they could be used as currency to buy drugs, the Gov' says, equally the books send to him, for the same reason, as paper can be infused and be smoked, blah blah. Craig resolved the latter issue by donating them to the prison library, from which he is allowed to receive them now, so as long as the prison library is in charge of dispersing impregnated pages, all is well...😂

Lastly, please try and give support by writing as it is the best way and means to up morale in prison. the address is provided on his campaign page and on wings over Scotland who have kindly supported Craig during his time inside.

https://wingsoverscotland.com/behind-the-walls/comment-page-1/#comment-267357

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Craig, because he is a civil prisoner, not a criminal inmate, has no right to get a tag and spent the rest of his four month in home detention, he has to carry on carrying on.

As a civil prisoner who has a serious problem with getting dizzy to the point of passing out, he has had his oxygen meter removed by the prison authority, it shows him when his oxygen is low and he needs ambulant attention. They said that the battery inside it could be used to start a fire.... ycnmiu.

But, then consider this article from the SPS, the Scottish Prison Service. Wanting to combat smoking in prison they spent 150.000 on 7500 e starter kits for inmates, with juice and chargers and BATTERIES.

https://archive.is/0ImpI

What does that make the removal of his oxy meter? Is it deliberate policy to destabilize the health of civil prisoners? Or is it another form of judicial revenge meted out to Craig Murray.

This excellent article names all those journalists who by their writing identified complainants in the AS trial in various MSM papers.

the various comments below the article are as good as the article by Rev. Stu at WoS. Enjoy, if you can enjoy the hypocritical malice of the COPFS.

https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-canary/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...