Jump to content
Note to existing users - password reset is required Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
Big Vince

Delia, Webber & Farke Out

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Big Vince said:

For the boy Farke to now come out and state that there are no positions in the team that require strengthening is just beyond belief. They conceded plenty of goals in the Championship last season and are letting in two goals a game at EPL level. Surely it should have dawned on the club that proper EPL centre-backs are required as is a proper EPL defensive midfielder, as our best player in this position is still one with no knees. 

It is painfully obvious that Farke, Webber and the board are colluding to get the club relegated and this has been the position ever since promotion was secured against Blackburn. They have all bought into this unachievable idea that the best way to survive in the EPL is to spend no money. The fans have been sold a false prospectus and the level of deceit coming out from the club is just odious in the extreme. This idea that Webber is supposed to be some kind of messianic figure who is going to lead the club to great things in the future (which is how he has been sold to fans) is just false, to put it politely. Farke and Webber are just stooges of the board as the latter have a long history of appointing yes-men. There is no chance that this board would ever appoint a Big Sam as such a person would be coming in to tell the board and we all know that Delia only likes people who agree with Delia. 

Marcus Evans is hardly pulling up many trees for your lot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a long term plan ,yes we will probably get relegated and lose a couple of players but we will bounce back quickly and be stronger for it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Midlands Yellow said:

Hands up who’s the biggest one Nutty. 

It's close, I have an idea but wouldn't bank on it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, sonyc said:

If they were not socialists Vince would that help?

Or if not living in Suffolk?

 

Yes, it would help if they were not socialists as their political ideology says a lot about their values which in turn influence heavily the way they run the club. 

Mr Chase was a Thatcherite which said a lot about his values that in turn influenced the way in which he ran the club.

You know which I prefer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Canary dwarf said:

It's a long term plan ,yes we will probably get relegated and lose a couple of players but we will bounce back quickly and be stronger for it

Can you ever imagine the Socialists spending EPL - level money?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

No  matter how many times  you have had it explained to you Vinceo, you still don't understand do you? The misery down at Portaloo rd  just does not affect  us at all, the only emotion you raise is pity. While we have restructured from top to bottom, refloated financially , rebuilt and restocked our academy  and beaten  the current  league champions,  your lot have had a good start , followed by a drop in form ....   in the 3rd division!!!  Hows that tree that's growing out of your roof. Hoping to sell it for firewood someday? ....marginal gains. Remember that phrase.

Edited by wcorkcanary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Big Vince said:

Can you ever imagine the Socialists spending EPL - level money?

Can you imagine your club having a category 1 academy? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Big Vince said:

Yes, it would help if they were not socialists as their political ideology says a lot about their values which in turn influence heavily the way they run the club. 

Mr Chase was a Thatcherite which said a lot about his values that in turn influenced the way in which he ran the club.

You know which I prefer.

I guess we were big fat Bob's coalmine then...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Dr Greenthumb said:

Marcus Evans is hardly pulling up many trees for your lot

Not even the ones growing out of the roof...

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, nutty nigel said:

I guess we were big fat Bob's coalmine then...

 

Well we had police horses charging at us on Carrow Road just like the striking miners did at Orgreave so your analogy is definitely an accurate one 😉 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, hogesar said:

As if some people actually agree with these fake, troll posts. How cringey 😂😂

And one of the the chief superintendent constables chips in .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big Vince is the Cato the Elder of this message-board, but unlike that monomaniac there’s a touch of self-mockery in his one-track obsession.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, PurpleCanary said:

Big Vince is the Cato the Elder of this message-board, but unlike that monomaniac there’s a touch of self-mockery in his one-track obsession.

More like Kato from the Pink Panther films. 😛

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, king canary said:

If you all stopped responding he'd probably **** off.

I doubt it. Theres too many actual posters that agree with him 😂😂😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, hogesar said:

I doubt it. Theres too many actual posters that agree with him 😂😂😂

As far as I can see only Midland has even remotely agreed with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, PurpleCanary said:

Big Vince is the Cato the Elder of this message-board, but unlike that monomaniac there’s a touch of self-mockery in his one-track obsession.

Has he got a friend called Henry? (Obscure literary reference alert).

As for being a bit of a penis FF, which part does he remind you of? The scraggy bit where it joins the testicles for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Big Vince said:

A very odd statement given the club is bottom of the league and is a dead-cert for relegation and is going to have half the team sold by its owners come August.

With fans like this no wonder the club gets the board it deserves.

So what's your source the club is going to have half the team sold by August? I can tell you right now that's complete and utter fabrication o your part!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ron obvious said:

Has he got a friend called Henry? (Obscure literary reference alert).

As for being a bit of a penis FF, which part does he remind you of? The scraggy bit where it joins the testicles for me.

Bell end, obvs

Edited by Feedthewolf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ron obvious said:

Has he got a friend called Henry? (Obscure literary reference alert).

As for being a bit of a penis FF, which part does he remind you of? The scraggy bit where it joins the testicles for me.

He reminds me of the part which I recently heard referred to as the 'jungle bridge' 😂

In other words, the perineum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BobLoz3 said:

He reminds me of the part which I recently heard referred to as the 'jungle bridge' 😂

In other words, the perineum.

:classic_biggrin: Isn't that more goolie associated though? 

I thought of bell end (obvs.) but I wanted a part that was really ugly & had no particular function. Personally I'm quite fond of my glans. Served me well in the past. Distant past :classic_sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ron obvious said:

Has he got a friend called Henry? (Obscure literary reference alert).

As for being a bit of a penis FF, which part does he remind you of? The scraggy bit where it joins the testicles for me.

I haven't read that one but based on the two I have I think we will just have to go our separate ways, accepting that literary talent🖌️ is very much in the Iris of the beholder...🤓

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, ron obvious said:

:classic_biggrin: Isn't that more goolie associated though? 

I thought of bell end (obvs.) but I wanted a part that was really ugly & had no particular function. Personally I'm quite fond of my glans. Served me well in the past. Distant past :classic_sad:

Yes, I guess it is! Still, all part of the male genitalia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just listen to yourselves.Grubby, smutty playground talk. Nearly 11.00 AM so back to lessons shortly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, PurpleCanary said:

I haven't read that one but based on the two I have I think we will just have to go our separate ways, accepting that literary talent🖌️ is very much in the Iris of the beholder...🤓

Amazing what you can find in the Daily Mail isn't it 😐

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×