a1canary 0 Posted December 19, 2005 1. Our inability to turn up for the opening period of a game is a hugepart of our problems, this and last season. We seem to actually need tobe a goal down before the team starts to play. At home, we can sometimes get away with it when traditionally the awayteam does not come at us hard from the off. But away from home whenteams come at us straight away, it''s very easy to see how we canvirtually have the game lost by half time (e.g. Luton, Coventry). Of course we''ve known about this starting badly thing for ages but it''sstill at the heart of what''s going wrong in my view. I don''t think youcan blame the manger for it particularly unless he''s telling them tolet the opposition come onto us in the opening period. Which i doubt!2. Ashton is NOT a target man, not in the way Iwan was. He''s great inthe air when attacking the ball, but not so great at receiving a longball. One of the best exponents of that is one P Crouch. He''ll get onthe end of a hoof out of defence, bring it down in a second and lay itoff to a winger or his strike partner. Which means we have to play it to Ashton''s feet more which we hardlydid once on Saturday. I can quite easily see how he might not hardlyget a sniff in a game if our wing play is cut off. All his goals camefrom crosses on Saturday. Ok he did well from them but without playingit to his feet we are missing out on a huge part of his game. He scoredloads for Crewe because they play the ball to feet. 3. Despite having Huckerby in the side, i thought we severley lackedpace on saturaday - as a team on the break i mean. We had opportunities to breakquickly but didn''t take them, opting to go sideways instead offorwards or to play it in the air when a clever ball along the deckinto space would have been better or a surging run from midfield. 4. When Hucks is on the pitch, we spend the whole time camped on theleft. The whole team seems to gravitate towards him. This is not hisfault and it''s a miracle that he manages to carry the immense burden ofthe whole team trying to play nearly every move though him as often ashe does. It''s no wonder he was knackered on Saturday after only havingmissed less than two games. Personally, for his own sake and not toburn him out, i still think he makes an awesome super sub. If we playwith wingers to start with, (granted that''s a problem on the right butMLJ when fit maybe and brennan left), then switch to 4-3-3 when Huckscomes on, it makes for a mean attacking tactical switch, should it beneeded. We all know what happened when Hucks went back to Man C and wewent int to the next game with a straight 4-4-2 formation... (he scored against thescum, he scored another one!)We were good on Satruday, don''t get me wrong, but were a shrewd managerlike a Curbishley or a Coppell sitting in the stands as next manager toface us, he wouldn''t exactly go back to his club quaking in his boots. Go atthem like a train from the off, and cut off their supply to Huckerby.Sorted. Yes, Safri got the assists but they were from free kicks or corners won by... you know who.If we are to build on Saturday we need more variety in our play and to take some of the burden off Hucks. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lucky green trainers 0 Posted December 19, 2005 hucks looks a super sub when he comes on because he creates chances - but he does that anyway. what the point having brennan on for 75 mins (who isn''t a winger) and has 30% of hucks creative ability - only then to bring hucks on anyway?hucks complained of being tired a few games ago, but imo he''s been carrying a niggle, and perhaps isn''t quite right yet, because he still looks slightly down on pace of last season, and especially before. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
a1canary 0 Posted December 19, 2005 and why has he been carring a niggle? because he''s buring out. he''s 30 in 4 months, we''re going to have to stop relying on him sooner or later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted December 19, 2005 i can see hucks being moved into a more central role if it is true about him burning out.. once the pace goes he is going to need a role that is suited to a slower player... i think he''d do well centrally at that time... he''s strong so can hold off players both defensively and coming forward.. and he can score so appearing in the box would worry defenders.jas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites