Salopian 1 Posted December 7, 2005 With or without Worthington, what new players do we need, in addition to improved tactics, selection and motivation?The most glaring deficiency is still in the midfield - differentcollections of players who seem to melt away, back off from challengesand generally contribute very little. There may be activity there, butit seems to be to little purpose and little shape.1) A wide-right,winger, missing for several seasons now. We have had asuccession of strikers or semi-strikers played there. I do not doubtthe effort of some, e.g. Hendo, but it is something of a specialistposition to get round the back to the by-line and cross accurately forAshton or Thorne to score. It is to be hoped that Hux will similarlytake on fullbacks again, even if he has to pull back on to his rightfoot.2) At least one central midfielder, comfortable on the ball and who canmake things happen by spotting and taking passing opportunities - aMulryne with vision. This is the best way to supply Ashton with theservice he needs, and would provide variety to the long ball out ofdefence to Ashton''s chest or higher, service which means that he ismarked long before the ball arrives. Many of the goals Ashton scored atCrewe were from defence splitting passes along the ground which reachedhim only a short distance into the opponenents'' half. He may not havedazzling pace, but he is difficult to prise off the ball when he isrunning purposefully towards goal.ContentiousIf, as seems likely, money will be short, I would prefer the aboveto signing Davenport, unless we can get him on loan again. Even withhim we are shipping goals. My feeling is that if we attacked more, andif we had an effective midfield who got their tackles in , then thedefence with or without Davenport would cope much better. LJ and Colinso far do not seem to have been up to the job. If Wright does notreturn, play Flem at right back, even if he is short of pace. I wouldnot put him back into the centre against some of the bruising strikerswe face. I would put Shackle in, and persevere with him. He ought to befit by now. Failing this, why not Charlton? He coped in the Premiership.With an effective midfield in place of the headless chickens, and adefence which is organised and keeps its shape, we could play muchbetter. With better tactics and motivation in addition, we might evenget somewhere near the play-offs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 274 Posted December 7, 2005 I am with you on the contentious bit salopian. Calum has built a good partnership with Doc but if funds are tight I still think the midfield is the weakest link, assuming Shax can get himself fit and picked. In an ideal world I would like to sign Calum and 2 midfielders but I cant see that happening.Out wide perhaps the like of Commons (to expensive now?) would do well but to be honest the number of wingers out there is small. For midfield the likes of Idiakez remains a pipe dream but Brown from Spurs on long term loan would fit the bill perfectly. OTBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted December 7, 2005 still wouldnt mind seeing Kevin Cooper... he did ok on his loan spell here and hes a right Winger! one of those mythical figures in Worthingtons eyesjas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DuncanMirams 0 Posted December 7, 2005 we need a centre back (davenport) , a winger (kris commons) , another winger and A NEW MANAGER. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites