Jump to content
Jools

The Positive Brexit Thread

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

The European Investment Bank (EIB) will still owe the UK billions of pounds for decades, as indicated by the institution’s chief Alexander Stubb. 

He outlined in 2017 that the debt will be paid back over decades, and may not be fully settled until 2054 !

The sum of the debt is £3.1billion.

On the 31/1/2020 the UK still had to pay the EU £32.9billion, it will be paid in installments over the next 40ish years.

🙂

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

The European Investment Bank (EIB) will still owe the UK billions of pounds for decades, as indicated by the institution’s chief Alexander Stubb. 

He outlined in 2017 that the debt will be paid back over decades, and may not be fully settled until 2054 !

The sum of the debt is £3.1billion.

Perhaps we can knock the £3.1 bn off the £32.9 bn we owe the EU. That Just leaves us £29.8 bn to pay the EU. You really are quite stupid aren't you!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SwindonCanary said:

The European Investment Bank (EIB) will still owe the UK billions of pounds for decades, as indicated by the institution’s chief Alexander Stubb. 

He outlined in 2017 that the debt will be paid back over decades, and may not be fully settled until 2054 !

The sum of the debt is £3.1billion.

And that’s just Nigel’s pension and repaying the fraudulent expenses claim.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, horsefly said:

Perhaps we can knock the £3.1 bn off the £32.9 bn we owe the EU. That Just leaves us £29.8 bn to pay the EU. You really are quite stupid aren't you!!!

it's not stupid, the idea of knocking it off the money owed would be sensible, but when have you known the EU to be  sensible ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

it's not stupid, the idea of knocking it off the money owed would be sensible, but when have you known the EU to be  sensible ?

Man who sets fire to head blames Swan Vesta shocker. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Herman said:

Man who sets fire to head blames Swan Vesta shocker. 

Should have bought Bryant & May.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

it's not stupid, the idea of knocking it off the money owed would be sensible, but when have you known the EU to be  sensible ?

There was the time they discovered that Nigel Farage has been fraudulently misusing election funds so they fined him and sensibly took the money out of his wages.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems the EU have p'd off the Swiss, now. Walked out of FTA talks. From the Spectator: 

The Swiss government yesterday pulled the plug on its seven-year negotiation of the EU-Swiss institutional framework agreement. Its failure was driven by familiar issues: freedom of movement and dynamic alignment. Just one year ago, the EU's Brexit negotiators still insisted on dynamic alignment — the idea that Britain would have to follow new EU rules even after it left the bloc. It was only the credible threat of the Johnson administration walking out of negotiations that ended this anti-democratic monstrosity. Every country, the EU included, has the right to restrict market access. But nobody has the right to impose their own legislation dynamically on third countries. This cannot be excused by the idea that, as the larger body in almost any negotiation, the EU has economic might on its side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

But nobody has the right to impose their own legislation dynamically on third countries. This cannot be excused by the idea that, as the larger body in almost any negotiation, the EU has economic might on its side.

What an absolutely pathetic argument.

Any party in any negotiation has the "right" to propose whichever terms it wishes, just as the other party has the right to reject those terms. 

The readership of The Spectator seems to be largely made up of simpletons with bewildering delusions of grandeur.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Rock The Boat said:

Seems the EU have p'd off the Swiss, now. Walked out of FTA talks. From the Spectator: 

The Swiss government yesterday pulled the plug on its seven-year negotiation of the EU-Swiss institutional framework agreement. Its failure was driven by familiar issues: freedom of movement and dynamic alignment. Just one year ago, the EU's Brexit negotiators still insisted on dynamic alignment — the idea that Britain would have to follow new EU rules even after it left the bloc. It was only the credible threat of the Johnson administration walking out of negotiations that ended this anti-democratic monstrosity. Every country, the EU included, has the right to restrict market access. But nobody has the right to impose their own legislation dynamically on third countries. This cannot be excused by the idea that, as the larger body in almost any negotiation, the EU has economic might on its side.

Laughably naive from the Spectator which is publishing articles and comments it would have once been ashamed to associate with its name. Ask the Northern Irish, fishermen, farmers, dairy producers, SMEs, etc, etc, etc, just what they think of the deal achieved by Johnson after his threat to flounce out of talks. Even the chief negotiator Frost now admits the deal he signed up to is "unsustainable", ie. crap. I wonder if he imagined himself as William Wallace as he bleated "They'll never take our freedom" as he condemned swathes of businesses at the stroke of a pen.

What a shame the UK no longer has the "might" to "pi*ss off" other countries who are now exploiting our pathetically weak and desperate negotiating position. 

Edited by horsefly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just imagine the mental gymnastics it takes to first buy the line that the EU is a desperately weak organisation that doesn't stand up for itself or its member states yet, magically, as soon as we leave, is an uncompromising brute who uses its disproportionate economic might to try to impose unfair terms on relative minnows. 

You couldn't make it up.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, kirku said:

Just imagine the mental gymnastics it takes to first buy the line that the EU is a desperately weak organisation that doesn't stand up for itself or its member states yet, magically, as soon as we leave, is an uncompromising brute who uses its disproportionate economic might to try to impose unfair terms on relative minnows. 

You couldn't make it up.

Unfortunately, RTB does make it up.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How's that "freedom" going then? 

British tourists pissed at being treated like cattle in Majorca (welcome to the EU)

French tourists pissed at being treated like cattle visting the UK.

I bet Boris and Pritti Patel think it's awfully funny though - these rules don't apply to them.

Freedom to travel.jpg

Freedom of movement.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, kirku said:

What an absolutely pathetic argument.

Any party in any negotiation has the "right" to propose whichever terms it wishes, just as the other party has the right to reject those terms. 

The readership of The Spectator seems to be largely made up of simpletons with bewildering delusions of grandeur.

It may have escaped your attention but the Swiss did exactly what you said in the second paragraph. So what point are you making?

Edited by Rock The Boat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

It may have escaped your attention but the Swiss did exactly what you said in the second paragraph. So what point are you making?

Jesus! You really do struggle to keep up don't you! It was you that said, "nobody has the right to impose their own legislation dynamically on third countries."  Kirku simply pointed out the rather obvious point that the EU has not imposed anything on the Swiss, but made proposals that the Swiss are entirely within their rights to turn down. The stupidity of your claim about the EU "imposing" its rules on a third country is the point Kirku is making. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading an article above regarding Switzerland, firstly I have to say Good on them for walking away from a 7 year long debate about a framework for treaties between the two parties

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

After reading an article above regarding Switzerland, firstly I have to say Good on them for walking away from a 7 year long debate about a framework for treaties between the two parties

Now read this article which argues that the fall out from this bodes very ill for a financial services deal between the EU and UK.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/eu-talks-breakdown-signals-harsher-trade-climate-for-the-uk-after-brexit/ar-AAKtYpy?ocid=msedgntp

Edited by horsefly
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor old Swindo finds the article confusing. It really couldn't be much more simple to understand; the breakdown of the Swiss EU deal demonstrated that the EU refuses to let non-EU countries cherry pick access to parts of the EU single market without sharing the costs of that access. Many brexiteers seem to have forgotten that our biggest area of trade, financial services, has yet to be negotiated. The evidence for the Swiss/EU deal breakdown suggests the EU will play hardball, and a FS deal will be even more difficult to achieve than the brexit deal negotiated to date. We are already aware that Frost admits the deal he signed was a disaster, now we face the prospect of an even greater disaster in negotiating an FS deal.

As William Wallace might now say, "They can take our financial Services but they will never take our freedom". Cue our negotiating team, the Judean People's Front Crack Suicide Squad (Brian's final words are most fitting):

 

Edited by horsefly
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's heading the way of every "people's will revolution" isn't it? The trend towards absolutism is unchecked, purity tests to ensure no compromise is allowed, no possibility of admitting the path they are on is wrong. Consuming the first generation of leaders of the movement with ever more extreme and authoritarian ones. Welcome to France 1791, Moscow 1921 ... London 2021.

Screen Shot 2021-05-29 at 05.59.19.png

Edited by Surfer
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Far enough from Swindo and his ilk but not to far from England. So Germany it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, SwindonCanary said:

Where would you rather live ?

image.png.ce9a06bbdffa24a9abef273c09e8c615.png

New Zealand. BTW bozo, we ALL live in the world. Can we now have a table ranking countries by numbers of deaths, then ask the same question.

Edited by horsefly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SwindonCanary said:

Where would you rather live ?

image.png.ce9a06bbdffa24a9abef273c09e8c615.png

Have you got the Dead tables to hand?

The one that the bloke who used to run the country said is full of unnecessary ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SwindonCanary said:

Where would you rather live ?

image.png.ce9a06bbdffa24a9abef273c09e8c615.png

Do you have the export figures ?  
You also seem to have left out all the countries that are ahead of the U.K. 

You may also want to tell us the effectiveness of the MRNA vaccines against traditional vaccines.

And by the way the EU will be vaccinated within weeks of us as they are catching us currently by about 1.5 % per day, they have also just purchased ( and will manufacture most ) 1.8 billion Pfizer doses.

This is of course another COVID story and absoloutely f*** all to do with Brexit.

By the way China have vaccinated 95% of those in 10 weeks and are currently approaching 20 million jabs per day. The jab in China is compulsory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Well b back said:

 

And by the way the EU will be vaccinated within weeks of us as they are catching us currently by about 1.5 % per day, they have also just purchased ( and will manufacture most ) 1.8 billion Pfizer doses.

 

https://www.politico.eu/coronavirus-in-europe/

They are as far behind as they have ever been.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...