Jump to content
Jools

The Positive Brexit Thread

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

So you obviously missed all the media attention that her speech created.

FYI 😉

https://www.pinkun.com/norwich-city/canaries-norwich-cardiac-arrest-carrow-road-tottenham-spurs-1-6448169

"I was so fortunate - my cardiologist said Carrow Road is the best place in Norfolk to have a cardiac arrest.

"If it hadn't been for St John's Ambulance I wouldn't be here. I need to thank the speed of St John's, the professionalism of the ground staff and the amazing work of the cardiologist team at Norfolk and Norwich."

Edited by Van wink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

So you obviously missed all the media attention that her speech created.

So that's your admission that you made it up, not even brave or honest enough to admit that.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, A Load of Squit said:

So that's your admission that you made it up, not even brave or honest enough to admit that.

 

I didn't make anything up unless you think that somehow I just invented Greta Thunberg and her climate circus. The facts are very plain that climate changers have been using scare tactics for many years now, and just like those end-of-the-world cultists who have been around for centuries predicting Armageddon, they have been wrong, and then wrong and wrong again. The world was going to end in 2019 according to so-called climate scientists back in 2014. It didn't. Now Greta and her Extintion Rebellion friends claim the plane will reach a tipping point in twelve years time and we will all be gone if fifteen unless we give up airplanes (except in the case of rich celebrities). We won't

If sea levels are going to rise and cause global flooding, how come no one told Barak Obama who just paid out million of dollars for a beachside property in Martha's Vineyard.

You've been played for the suckers you are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

I didn't make anything up unless you think that somehow I just invented Greta Thunberg and her climate circus. The facts are very plain that climate changers have been using scare tactics for many years now, and just like those end-of-the-world cultists who have been around for centuries predicting Armageddon, they have been wrong, and then wrong and wrong again. The world was going to end in 2019 according to so-called climate scientists back in 2014. It didn't. Now Greta and her Extintion Rebellion friends claim the plane will reach a tipping point in twelve years time and we will all be gone if fifteen unless we give up airplanes (except in the case of rich celebrities). We won't

If sea levels are going to rise and cause global flooding, how come no one told Barak Obama who just paid out million of dollars for a beachside property in Martha's Vineyard.

You've been played for the suckers you are.

" So when Greta Thunburg says the world will end in 15 years from now (funny how it's always 15 years,"

She didn't say that, you made it up.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, A Load of Squit said:

" So when Greta Thunburg says the world will end in 15 years from now (funny how it's always 15 years,"

She didn't say that, you made it up.

 

Course he did and much else besides (he seems to have a particular problem with Greta although I imagine he probably has a problem with any teenage girl who is better educated, better informed, smarter and more articulate than he is, being foreign won't help either!) 

Science isn't @RTB's strong suit, or economics, or engaging his brain or truthfullness...............but he is sh*t hot when it comes to fake news  😀

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get your application in CM :classic_biggrin:

‘Two hands are a lot’ — we’re hiring data scientists, project managers, policy experts, assorted weirdos…

‘This is possibly the single largest design flaw contributing to the bad Nash equilibrium in which … many governments are stuck. Every individual high-functioning competent person knows they can’t make much difference by being one more face in that crowd.’ Eliezer Yudkowsky, AI expert, LessWrong etc.

‘[M]uch of our intellectual elite who think they have “the solutions” have actually cut themselves off from understanding the basis for much of the most important human progress.’ Michael Nielsen, physicist and one of the handful of most interesting people I’ve ever talked to.

‘People, ideas, machines — in that order.’ Colonel Boyd.

‘There isn’t one novel thought in all of how Berkshire [Hathaway] is run. It’s all about … exploiting unrecognized simplicities.’ Charlie Munger,Warren Buffett’s partner.

‘Two hands, it isn’t much considering how the world is infinite. Yet, all the same, two hands, they are a lot.’ Alexander Grothendieck, one of the great mathematicians.

*

There are many brilliant people in the civil service and politics. Over the past five months the No10 political team has been lucky to work with some fantastic officials. But there are also some profound problems at the core of how the British state makes decisions. This was seen by pundit-world as a very eccentric view in 2014. It is no longer seen as eccentric. Dealing with these deep problems is supported by many great officials, particularly younger ones, though of course there will naturally be many fears — some reasonable, most unreasonable.

Now there is a confluence of: a) Brexit requires many large changes in policy and in the structure of decision-making, b) some people in government are prepared to take risks to change things a lot, and c) a new government with a significant majority and little need to worry about short-term unpopularity while trying to make rapid progress with long-term problems.

There is a huge amount of low hanging fruit — trillion dollar bills lying on the street — in the intersection of:

  • the selection, education and training of people for high performance
  • the frontiers of the science of prediction
  • data science, AI and cognitive technologies (e.g Seeing Rooms, ‘authoring tools designed for arguing from evidence’, Tetlock/IARPA prediction tournaments that could easily be extended to consider ‘clusters’ of issues around themes like Brexit to improve policy and project management)
  • communication (e.g Cialdini)
  • decision-making institutions at the apex of government.

We want to hire an unusual set of people with different skills and backgrounds to work in Downing Street with the best officials, some as spads and perhaps some as officials. If you are already an official and you read this blog and think you fit one of these categories, get in touch.

The categories are roughly:

  • Data scientists and software developers
  • Economists
  • Policy experts
  • Project managers
  • Communication experts
  • Junior researchers one of whom will also be my personal assistant
  • Weirdos and misfits with odd skills

We want to improve performance and make me much less important — and within a year largely redundant. At the moment I have to make decisions well outside what Charlie Munger calls my ‘circle of competence’ and we do not have the sort of expertise supporting the PM and ministers that is needed. This must change fast so we can properly serve the public.

A. Unusual mathematicians, physicists, computer scientists, data scientists

You must have exceptional academic qualifications from one of the world’s best universities or have done something that demonstrates equivalent (or greater) talents and skills. You do not need a PhD — as Alan Kay said, we are also interested in graduate students as ‘world-class researchers who don’t have PhDs yet’.

You should have the following:

  • PhD or MSc in maths or physics.
  • Outstanding mathematical skills are essential.
  • Experience of using analytical languages: e.g. Python, SQL, R.
  • Familiarity with data tools and technologies such as Postgres, Scikit Learn, NEO4J.

A few examples of papers that you will be considering:

You should be able to explain to other mathematicians, physicists and computer scientists the ideas in such papers, discuss what could be useful for our projects, synthesise ideas for other data scientists, and apply them to practical problems. You won’t be expert on the maths used in all these papers but you should be confident that you could study it and understand it.

We will be using machine learning and associated tools so it is important you can program. You do not need software development levels of programming but it would be an advantage.

Those applying must watch Bret Victor’s talks and study Dynamic Land. If this excites you, then apply; if not, then don’t. I and others interviewing will discuss this with anybody who comes for an interview. If you want a sense of the sort of things you’d be working on, then read my previous blog on Seeing Rooms, cognitive technologies etc.

B. Unusual software developers

We are looking for great software developers who would love to work on these ideas, build tools and work with some great people. You should also look at some of Victor’s technical talks on programming languages and the history of computing.

You will be working with data scientists, designers and others.

C. Unusual economists

We are looking to hire some recent graduates in economics. You should a) have an outstanding record at a great university, b) understand conventional economic theories, c) be interested in arguments on the edge of the field — for example, work by physicists on ‘agent-based models’ or by the hedge fund Bridgewater on the failures/limitations of conventional macro theories/prediction, and d) have very strong maths and be interested in working with mathematicians, physicists, and computer scientists.

The ideal candidate might, for example, have a degree in maths and economics, worked at the LHC in one summer, worked with a quant fund another summer, and written software for a YC startup in a third summer!

We’ve found one of these but want at least one more.

The sort of conversation you might have is discussing these two papers in Science (2015): Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines, Gershman et al and Economic reasoning and artificial intelligence, Parkes & Wellman

You will see in these papers an intersection of:

  • von Neumann’s foundation of game theory and ‘expected utility’,
  • mainstream economic theories,
  • modern theories about auctions,
  • theoretical computer science (including problems like the complexity of probabilistic inference in Bayesian networks, which is in the NP–hard complexity class),
  • ideas on ‘computational rationality’ and meta-reasoning from AI, cognitive science and so on.

If these sort of things are interesting, then you will find this project interesting.

It’s a bonus if you can code but it isn’t necessary.

D. Great project managers.

If you think you are one of the a small group of people in the world who are truly GREAT at project management, then we want to talk to you. Victoria Woodcock ran Vote Leave — she was a truly awesome project manager and without her Cameron would certainly have won. We need people like this who have a 1 in 10,000 or higher level of skill and temperament.

The Oxford Handbook on Megaprojects points out that it is possible to quantify lessons from the failures of projects like high speed rail projects because almost all fail so there is a large enough sample to make statistical comparisons, whereas there can be no statistical analysis of successes because they are so rare.

It is extremely interesting that the lessons of Manhattan (1940s), ICBMs (1950s) and Apollo (1960s) remain absolutely cutting edge because it is so hard to apply them and almost nobody has managed to do it. The Pentagon systematically de-programmed itself from more effective approaches to less effective approaches from the mid-1960s, in the name of ‘efficiency’. Is this just another way of saying that people like General Groves and George Mueller are rarer than Fields Medallists?

Anyway — it is obvious that improving government requires vast improvements in project management. The first project will be improving the people and skills already here.

If you want an example of the sort of people we need to find in Britain, look at this on CC Myers — the legendary builders. SPEED. We urgently need people with these sort of skills and attitude. (If you think you are such a company and you could dual carriageway the A1 north of Newcastle in record time, then get in touch!)

E. Junior researchers

In many aspects of government, as in the tech world and investing, brains and temperament smash experience and seniority out of the park.

We want to hire some VERY clever young people either straight out of university or recently out with with extreme curiosity and capacity for hard work.

One of you will be a sort of personal assistant to me for a year — this will involve a mix of very interesting work and lots of uninteresting trivia that makes my life easier which you won’t enjoy. You will not have weekday date nights, you will sacrifice many weekends — frankly it will hard having a boy/girlfriend at all. It will be exhausting but interesting and if you cut it you will be involved in things at the age of ~21 that most people never see.

I don’t want confident public school bluffers. I want people who are much brighter than me who can work in an extreme environment. If you play office politics, you will be discovered and immediately binned.

F. Communications

In SW1 communication is generally treated as almost synonymous with ‘talking to the lobby’. This is partly why so much punditry is ‘narrative from noise’.

With no election for years and huge changes in the digital world, there is a chance and a need to do things very differently.

We’re particularly interested in deep experts on TV and digital. We also are interested in people who have worked in movies or on advertising campaigns. There are some very interesting possibilities in the intersection of technology and story telling — if you’ve done something weird, this may be the place for you.

I noticed in the recent campaign that the world of digital advertising has changed very fast since I was last involved in 2016. This is partly why so many journalists wrongly looked at things like Corbyn’s Facebook stats and thought Labour was doing better than us — the ecosystem evolves rapidly while political journalists are still behind the 2016 tech, hence why so many fell for Carole’s conspiracy theories. The digital people involved in the last campaign really knew what they are doing, which is incredibly rare in this world of charlatans and clients who don’t know what they should be buying. If you are interested in being right at the very edge of this field, join.

We have some extremely able people but we also must upgrade skills across the spad network.

G. Policy experts

One of the problems with the civil service is the way in which people are shuffled such that they either do not acquire expertise or they are moved out of areas they really know to do something else. One Friday, X is in charge of special needs education, the next week X is in charge of budgets.

There are, of course, general skills. Managing a large organisation involves some general skills. Whether it is Coca Cola or Apple, some things are very similar — how to deal with people, how to build great teams and so on. Experience is often over-rated. When Warren Buffett needed someone to turn around his insurance business he did not hire someone with experience in insurance: ‘When Ajit entered Berkshire’s office on a Saturday in 1986, he did not have a day’s experience in the insurance business’ (Buffett).

Shuffling some people who are expected to be general managers is a natural thing but it is clear Whitehall does this too much while also not training general management skills properly. There are not enough people with deep expertise in specific fields.

If you want to work in the policy unit or a department and you really know your subject so that you could confidently argue about it with world-class experts, get in touch.

It’s also the case that wherever you are most of the best people are inevitably somewhere else. This means that governments must be much better at tapping distributed expertise. Of the top 20 people in the world who best understand the science of climate change and could advise us what to do with COP 2020, how many now work as a civil servant/spad or will become one in the next 5 years?

G. Super-talented weirdos

People in SW1 talk a lot about ‘diversity’ but they rarely mean ‘true cognitive diversity’. They are usually babbling about ‘gender identity diversity blah blah’. What SW1 needs is not more drivel about ‘identity’ and ‘diversity’ from Oxbridge humanities graduates but more genuine cognitive diversity.

We need some true wild cards, artists, people who never went to university and fought their way out of an appalling hell hole, weirdos from William Gibson novels like that girl hired by Bigend as a brand ‘diviner’ who feels sick at the sight of Tommy Hilfiger or that Chinese-Cuban free runner from a crime family hired by the KGB. If you want to figure out what characters around Putin might do, or how international criminal gangs might exploit holes in our border security, you don’t want more Oxbridge English graduates who chat about Lacan at dinner parties with TV producers and spread fake news about fake news.

By definition I don’t really know what I’m looking for but I want people around No10 to be on the lookout for such people.

We need to figure out how to use such people better without asking them to conform to the horrors of ‘Human Resources’ (which also obviously need a bonfire).

*

Send a max 1 page letter plus CV to ideasfornumber10@gmail.com and put in the subject line ‘job/’ and add after the / one of: data, developer, econ, comms, projects, research, policy, misfit.

I’ll have to spend time helping you so don’t apply unless you can commit to at least 2 years.

I’ll bin you within weeks if you don’t fit — don’t complain later because I made it clear now. 

I will try to answer as many as possible but last time I publicly asked for job applications in 2015 I was swamped and could not, so I can’t promise an answer. If you think I’ve insanely ignored you, persist for a while.

I will use this blog to throw out ideas. It’s important when dealing with large organisations to dart around at different levels, not be stuck with formal hierarchies. It will seem chaotic and ‘not proper No10 process’ to some. But the point of this government is to do things differently and better and this always looks messy. We do not care about trying to ‘control the narrative’ and all that New Labour junk and this government will not be run by ‘comms grid’.

As Paul Graham and Peter Thiel say, most ideas that seem bad are bad but great ideas also seem at first like bad ideas — otherwise someone would have already done them. Incentives and culture push people in normal government systems away from encouraging ‘ideas that seem bad’. Part of the point of a small, odd No10 team is to find and exploit, without worrying about media noise, what Andy Grove called ‘very high leverage ideas’ and these will almost inevitably seem bad to most.

I will post some random things over the next few weeks and see what bounces back — it is all upside, there’s no downside if you don’t mind a bit of noise and it’s a fast cheap way to find good ideas…

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
 
 
 
54 minutes ago, Van wink said:

Get your application in CM :classic_biggrin:

I'm pretty certain Cummings will not be looking for common purpose idio..er.. graduates, winky 😀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rock The Boat said:

What exactly did the EU do that we didn't do, in respect of these civil servants?

Where do want to start - How about trade deals, medicines, nuclear, chemical, setting all those rules for agriculture, food standards, IPR, air safety, banking and so on. That's not even touching on the top level (or bottom level) functions of strategy, customs officers, border control. You can go look up all the agencies yourself i.e Euratom, EMA, ECHA, EASA - Not on idiot Twitter but on grown up websites.

All these functions need to be recreated and staffed i.e. duplicated.

Jobs for the boys and girls.

Unless of course you want to stay in some of them.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, A Load of Squit said:

No, in the last week you've posted an incorrect map and declared that we were leaving the EU on 31/12/19.

That's stupid and only a stupid person would do that.

The new deadline has been set for 31 January 2020, three and a half years after the referendum was held.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

The new deadline has been set for 31 January 2020, three and a half years after the referendum was held.

Swindon, I've suspected for some time that you may be a Remainiac alter ego acting as a Brexiteer; a kind of foil for Remainiacs to have a bash at, because you tend to set yourself up a lot with obvious mistakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Yellow Fever said:

Where do want to start - How about trade deals, medicines, nuclear, chemical, setting all those rules for agriculture, food standards, IPR, air safety, banking and so on. That's not even touching on the top level (or bottom level) functions of strategy, customs officers, border control. You can go look up all the agencies yourself i.e Euratom, EMA, ECHA, EASA - Not on idiot Twitter but on grown up websites.

All these functions need to be recreated and staffed i.e. duplicated.

Jobs for the boys and girls.

Unless of course you want to stay in some of them.....

So in other words it was all a lie during the Referendum when Remainers claimed that the UK makes it's own laws? You've just proved otherwise. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could somebody let me know when the following is reported on the BBC News:

 

'Labour’s hard-left candidate for Home Secretary Diane Abbott’s privately educated son has appeared in court over a raft of charges including allegedly assaulting staff at London hospitals and exposing himself over the course of 2019'

 

They would be all over it like a rash if it were one of Farage's offspring.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

New Year in Germany courtesy of our new friends from overseas.

 

Where to start on the wonders of mass and enforced cultural diversity, RtB?


It might require a separate thread.

 

Merkel-Selfie-2015-640x480.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hurrah for the blackshirts.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2415122/Twitter-troll-unmasked-Father-Britains-vilest-internet-trolls-exposed-posting-sick-jokes-Hillsborough-disaster.html

"With an appearance more akin to Coronation Street’s hapless cafe owner Roy Cropper than a cutting-edge satirist, he initially denied he was Old Holborn."

Edited by Herman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

So in other words it was all a lie during the Referendum when Remainers claimed that the UK makes it's own laws? You've just proved otherwise. Thank you.

You really don't understand what civil servants do, do you be they of a UK or EU variety.

Nevermind.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, SwindonCanary said:

name calling because you can't win the argument 😉

It’s not name calling. He’s stating facts.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jools said:

So does that make the clip RtB posted fake, Hermione? Because it looks pretty real to me.

Hermione was the clever one in Harry Potter. Nice of you to dish out the compliments ☺️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"People in SW1 talk a lot about ‘diversity’ but they rarely mean ‘true cognitive diversity’. They are usually babbling about ‘gender identity diversity blah blah’. What SW1 needs is not more drivel about ‘identity’ and ‘diversity’ from Oxbridge humanities graduates but more genuine cognitive diversity." ~ Dominic Cummings

 

The future has just got a little bit brighter 😎

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't say it was fake. I was just showing some of the utter ****s you and Rock The Bot follow online so as we can understand your behaviour and why you are so hate filled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hoola Han Solo said:

It’s not name calling. He’s stating facts.

 

quoting "Yes, we all get it. You're stupid and everything you post is stupid".    😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

quoting "Yes, we all get it. You're stupid and everything you post is stupid".    😂

So it's stupid to write Thanks guys and a HAPPY NEW YEAR to you all 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

quoting "Yes, we all get it. You're stupid and everything you post is stupid".    😂

Calm down Swindo, you might damage your last few remaining brain cells 🧠 🤪

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Dear oh dear, Hoola Han sol  you are getting a little lost there =must try harder 😁

On 31/12/2019 at 23:08, SwindonCanary said:

Thanks guys and a HAPPY NEW YEAR to you all 

 

Edited by SwindonCanary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

Dear oh dear, Hoola Han sol  you are getting a little lost there =must try harder 😁

 

Genuine question: are you retarded?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...