Jump to content
Jools

The Positive Brexit Thread

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Herman said:

 

Anyway, Britain First members being urged to join the Conservatives. Nice company you keep there. 

 

Edited by Herman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Herman said:

You tend to struggle with humour so forgive me for not being too upset.

 

On what do you base that assertion?

Was your remark meant to be witty? Coruscating? Incisive? Or just sh!te? Something a 13 year old might find amusing?

You are utterly, utterly pathetic.

 

Edited by ron obvious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ron obvious said:

On what do you base that assertion?

 

Well its obvious, you didnt laugh at a joke about the size of a Asian/Ugandan ladies bum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, ron obvious said:

 

On what do you base that assertion?

Was your remark meant to be witty? Coruscating? Incisive? Or just sh!te? Something a 13 year old might find amusing?

You are utterly, utterly pathetic.

 

You must admit she has a humungous ****. That front bench is going to be uncomfortable, what with her and fatso Johnson. I half expect someone to fall off the end when one of them budges up. At least those tubs of lard Bridgen and Francois aren't important enough......🤣

Edited by Herman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Herman said:

I was thinking a fascistic hellscape. What did you have? 

Something rather similar, or to put it in Ricardo's terms - there certainly won't be any point betting on the next election result.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Creative Midfielder said:

Something rather similar, or to put it in Ricardo's terms - there certainly won't be any point betting on the next election result.

Lets hope so, a successful 5 years is what we need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, loser pillocks 👇

 

Delingpole: Three Cheers for Brexit Heroes Gina Miller and Jolyon Maugham!

jolyon-maugham-640x480.png

Let’s celebrate two of the unsung heroes of Brexit: Gina Miller and Jolyon Maugham QC!

Nobody remembers them today, of course. Like David Gauke, Andrew Adonis, Sam Gymiah, and all the other bizarre anomalous creatures who rose briefly to prominence during the Brexit wars, their destiny from now on is, at best, to be seen drinking liquidised kangaroo testicles on future series of I’m A Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here — or, at worst, to end up as the subject of tricky pub quiz trivia questions which not even the hardcore quizzers will get right.

But before they disappear forever down the plughole of history, let us pause briefly to toast their vital contribution to Brexit.

Gina Miller, you’ll dimly recall, was the posh, rich financier woman who appeared from nowhere with her wodges of City cash and her gobby relentlessness, determined to pull every trick in the book to try prevent all those plebby, uneducated people who voted for Brexit from getting their democratically expressed wish.

Jolyon Maugham QC was the working-class lad who triumphed over his awkward name and humble background as natural son of the Old Etonian author David Benedictus to earn many hundreds of thousands of pounds a year from his windmill home as arguably the best known left-wing barrister on Twitter.

Both were thorns in the side of the Brexit movement and for a time it seemed as if they might stymie Brexit altogether.

Earlier this year, when he was still a thing, Maugham was the subject of an admiring profile in Counsel Magazine:

For the past two-and-a-half years, his main other interest has been Brexit. Along with The Good Law Project, the not-for-profit organisation he founded, Maugham has driven the legal debate on the issue since the referendum result.

He was involved in the early stages of the case that became Gina Miller’s successful Supreme Court challenge, forcing the Prime Minister to get approval from Parliament before formally notifying the EU of our departure.

Maugham then took the Electoral Commission to the High Court over what he saw as its inadequate investigation into Vote Leave’s campaign spending. Under pressure, the Commission agreed to look again and eventually referred the matter to the police.

Like a determined spaniel with a manky bit of fox-gnawed lamb’s bone it has found in the field, Maugham just refused to let go of his prey. Even when his prey was an actual working-class lad from the North-East whose only crime was to have ticked the wrong box on an ambiguous form to do with election spending limits, Maugham pressed on and on…

 

Darren GrimesVerified account @darrengrimes_

 
 
 
 

Darren Grimes Retweeted Alex Wickham

Hi @ElectoralCommUK, @carolecadwalla, @JolyonMaugham, @Channel4News & @guardian. Happy Thursday! You can stick your trumped-up charges where the sun doesn't shine.

Darren Grimes added,

Alex WickhamVerified account @alexwickham
Judgement handed down in Court of Appeal Lord Chief Justice has ruled BeLeave *was* a permitted participant and entitled to the donations made to it - contrary to Electoral Commission view - and so its return…
101 replies . 555 retweets 1,919 likes
 

But though Gina and Jolyon have received widespread mockery for the pettifogging, vindictive, anti-democratic antics since the 2016 Brexit referendum, I think the time has come to give credit where credit is due.

If Gina and Jolyon hadn’t fought so hard against Brexit it is a racing certainty that Theresa May’s utterly disastrous Brexit In Name Only “deal” with the EU would have passed through Parliament. May would likely be still prime minister. And Boris would be just a thwarted backbencher.

How delicious is the law of unintended consequences!

With hindsight, I think we can all now see that Brexit was inevitable — and that all the people who said that it wasn’t were fools, and that all who imagined they could stand in its way, only to end up being crushed by fortune’s wheel, were just a bunch of loser pillocks.

But if Gina Miller and Jolyon Maugham QC are loser pillocks — and they are! — then at least they are my favourite kind of loser pillock. The kind of loser pillock that deserves a pair of statues in Parliament Square, perhaps glaring bitterly towards the Palace of Westminster as they realise belatedly what they have achieved: they have ensured that Britain is going to get a much, much harder Brexit than it would have done without their meddling.

And for this, if nothing else, they deserve to be celebrated from this day to the ending of the world.

image.png

 

By James Delingpole

Edited by Jools

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kick it off said:

When did stating facts become name calling?

How's Pearl by the way? Still living it up on Instagram?

Pearl is fine !   still liking in the States   😛

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Jools said:

Aye, loser pillocks 👇

 

Delingpole: Three Cheers for Brexit Heroes Gina Miller and Jolyon Maugham!

jolyon-maugham-640x480.png

Let’s celebrate two of the unsung heroes of Brexit: Gina Miller and Jolyon Maugham QC!

Nobody remembers them today, of course. Like David Gauke, Andrew Adonis, Sam Gymiah, and all the other bizarre anomalous creatures who rose briefly to prominence during the Brexit wars, their destiny from now on is, at best, to be seen drinking liquidised kangaroo testicles on future series of I’m A Celebrity…Get Me Out of Here — or, at worst, to end up as the subject of tricky pub quiz trivia questions which not even the hardcore quizzers will get right.

But before they disappear forever down the plughole of history, let us pause briefly to toast their vital contribution to Brexit.

Gina Miller, you’ll dimly recall, was the posh, rich financier woman who appeared from nowhere with her wodges of City cash and her gobby relentlessness, determined to pull every trick in the book to try prevent all those plebby, uneducated people who voted for Brexit from getting their democratically expressed wish.

Jolyon Maugham QC was the working-class lad who triumphed over his awkward name and humble background as natural son of the Old Etonian author David Benedictus to earn many hundreds of thousands of pounds a year from his windmill home as arguably the best known left-wing barrister on Twitter.

Both were thorns in the side of the Brexit movement and for a time it seemed as if they might stymie Brexit altogether.

Earlier this year, when he was still a thing, Maugham was the subject of an admiring profile in Counsel Magazine:

For the past two-and-a-half years, his main other interest has been Brexit. Along with The Good Law Project, the not-for-profit organisation he founded, Maugham has driven the legal debate on the issue since the referendum result.

He was involved in the early stages of the case that became Gina Miller’s successful Supreme Court challenge, forcing the Prime Minister to get approval from Parliament before formally notifying the EU of our departure.

Maugham then took the Electoral Commission to the High Court over what he saw as its inadequate investigation into Vote Leave’s campaign spending. Under pressure, the Commission agreed to look again and eventually referred the matter to the police.

Like a determined spaniel with a manky bit of fox-gnawed lamb’s bone it has found in the field, Maugham just refused to let go of his prey. Even when his prey was an actual working-class lad from the North-East whose only crime was to have ticked the wrong box on an ambiguous form to do with election spending limits, Maugham pressed on and on…

 

Darren GrimesVerified account @darrengrimes_

 
 
 
 

Darren Grimes Retweeted Alex Wickham

Hi @ElectoralCommUK, @carolecadwalla, @JolyonMaugham, @Channel4News & @guardian. Happy Thursday! You can stick your trumped-up charges where the sun doesn't shine.

Darren Grimes added,

Alex WickhamVerified account @alexwickham
Judgement handed down in Court of Appeal Lord Chief Justice has ruled BeLeave *was* a permitted participant and entitled to the donations made to it - contrary to Electoral Commission view - and so its return…
101 replies . 555 retweets 1,919 likes
 

But though Gina and Jolyon have received widespread mockery for the pettifogging, vindictive, anti-democratic antics since the 2016 Brexit referendum, I think the time has come to give credit where credit is due.

If Gina and Jolyon hadn’t fought so hard against Brexit it is a racing certainty that Theresa May’s utterly disastrous Brexit In Name Only “deal” with the EU would have passed through Parliament. May would likely be still prime minister. And Boris would be just a thwarted backbencher.

How delicious is the law of unintended consequences!

With hindsight, I think we can all now see that Brexit was inevitable — and that all the people who said that it wasn’t were fools, and that all who imagined they could stand in its way, only to end up being crushed by fortune’s wheel, were just a bunch of loser pillocks.

But if Gina Miller and Jolyon Maugham QC are loser pillocks — and they are! — then at least they are my favourite kind of loser pillock. The kind of loser pillock that deserves a pair of statues in Parliament Square, perhaps glaring bitterly towards the Palace of Westminster as they realise belatedly what they have achieved: they have ensured that Britain is going to get a much, much harder Brexit than it would have done without their meddling.

And for this, if nothing else, they deserve to be celebrated from this day to the ending of the world.

image.png

 

By James Delingpole

This can't be true because Bill said Brexit would never happen

 

🤣

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rock The Boat said:

This can't be true because Bill said Brexit would never happen

 

🤣

 

More like Little Weed

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh, temper, temper Steptoe...

🎵God rest ye merry socialists
     Let nothing you dismay
     Remember Jezza your saviour
     Did 'shut that door' this day
     To save us all from Boris' pow'r
     When we were gone astray


    Oh tidings of comfort and joy
    Comfort and joy
    Oh tidings of comfort and joy.... 🎵

 

😀

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clive Lewis (yes I know he's from the fine City) and Emily Thornberry, the two that's put their names forward so far. Labour will never win until they get rid of the Corbynizum ! 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Rock The Boat said:

Spare a thought this Christmas for the people going hungry because they’re too fat to walk to the food bank.

Jezza would have given them all mobility scooters to get there.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Jools said:

What's wrong, don't you have photo ID?

Won't affect you anyway, your prefered Parties are ****** for a generation 😀

There is a plethora of photo IDs available. It wouldn’t be difficult to generate photo IDs using passport photo booths too.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And so the "you voted for us, now we will tell you what you voted for" scam has started then...

 

Boris Johnson’s EU withdrawal agreement bill has been published, with protections on workers’ rights, unaccompanied refugee children and parliament’s say over the future relationship stripped out.

MPs are expecting to vote on the EU withdrawal agreement bill for the first time in this parliament on Friday, as Johnson aims to rush it through its first stage before Christmas.

The new bill scraps or waters down a number of key protections that were in the last one published in October, when Johnson was trying to get the support of some backbench Labour MPs to get it through parliament.

It removes an entire schedule that promised to protect workers’ rights, with the government suggesting this will now be dealt with in separate legislation.

Ministers will no longer be bound by the legislation to provide updates on the future trading relationship or to make sure parliament approves the government’s negotiating objectives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Herman said:

It's so sad (yet predictable) that the UK is rushing to become the 51st State of the Union. This is the same BS answer to the same BS accusation and like here in the US it has zero data to back up the claims. It's pure voter suppression by the party in power. If you want an I.D to vote, then invoke a mandatory national I.D at no cost to the individual - there is no reason why your National Insurance card can't have biometric I.D added to it to act an a national I.D card for example. 

If you object to that on the grounds that is too "big brother" then you must object to the idea of using any form of photo I.D to be able to vote. You can't have it both ways .....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you have a populace with principles as fluid as the average Brexiter this government can come up with any scam and they will quickly fail in line. And if any of them tell you they have Christian morals you can point them to the removal of the Dubs agreement on child refugees. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Herman said:

I was thinking a fascistic hellscape. What did you have? 

An early step that way this morning with the news that the next Bank of England is likely to be a second rater, but of course a compliant second rater as far as the givernment is concerned.

So the BoE will soon be about as 'independent' as the BBC has become  ☹️

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Creative Midfielder said:

An early step that way this morning with the news that the next Bank of England is likely to be a second rater, but of course a compliant second rater as far as the givernment is concerned.

So the BoE will soon be about as 'independent' as the BBC has become  ☹️

Brexit purity is necessary. Any financial nous not so. It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Herman said:

Brexit purity is necessary. Any financial nous not so. It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic. 

That is it in a nutshell - very noticeable what a minor role the economy has played in the last two elections.

Just shows how effective propaganda can be - ten years ago voters were told that everything - public services, NHS, law & order had to take second (or third) place behind getting the economy into a healthy state and they believed it.

This year they have been told that we can damage the economy even further, despite its very feeble and declining state, and also spend loads of money on the things the public want, and they believed that as well!!

But, of course, they are not stupid and they know exactly what they voted for!!   🤣😂🤣

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Surfer said:

And so the "you voted for us, now we will tell you what you voted for" scam has started then...

 

Boris Johnson’s EU withdrawal agreement bill has been published, with protections on workers’ rights, unaccompanied refugee children and parliament’s say over the future relationship stripped out.

MPs are expecting to vote on the EU withdrawal agreement bill for the first time in this parliament on Friday, as Johnson aims to rush it through its first stage before Christmas.

The new bill scraps or waters down a number of key protections that were in the last one published in October, when Johnson was trying to get the support of some backbench Labour MPs to get it through parliament.

It removes an entire schedule that promised to protect workers’ rights, with the government suggesting this will now be dealt with in separate legislation.

Ministers will no longer be bound by the legislation to provide updates on the future trading relationship or to make sure parliament approves the government’s negotiating objectives.

All sensible moves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

Well said that man !

Not heard that Zac Goldsmith and Nicky Morgan will be imposing laws and taxes on British citizens despite not being democratically elected.

He seems to be as stupid as you are Swindo.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...