Jump to content
Jools

The Positive Brexit Thread

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Well b back said:

So those who just hated the Europeans told us the jobs in Britain must be for the Brits. Please read all of this article to see how Brexit is effecting recruitment after the Europeans decided to take your advice and f*** off back to Europe.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57555608

there's over 100,000 EU people in this country, plus they all want to come over here to work = WE MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

there's over 100,000 EU people in this country, plus they all want to come over here to work = WE MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT !

As I said you talk some s***. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

there's over 100,000 EU people in this country, plus they all want to come over here to work = WE MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT !

The point of the link is that they no longer want to come here to work and it causing businesses problems, some restaurants have had to stop serving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, A Load of Squit said:

The point of the link is that they no longer want to come here to work and it causing businesses problems, some restaurants have had to stop serving.

Pay a decent wage and you can get the unemployed to do it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

there's over 100,000 EU people in this country, plus they all want to come over here to work = WE MUST BE DOING SOMETHING RIGHT !

Another deluded Dido supporter who wants to get rid of immigrant doctors and nurses in the NHS. She says that we can rid ourselves of immigrant staff in the NHS in two years, another wrecking ball thrown into the air. These 10%/130.000 staff in the NHS she wants rid off have worked their collective guts off to serve this country through a pandemic and before and she is nothing but an errant incompetent failure/money grabber who would like to help to privatise the rest of the NHS to the creeps who are slowly buying up GP surgeries on the sly and other US health care companies.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

 

 

 

Pay a decent wage and you can get the unemployed to do it.  

But we weren’t told that, we were told Europeans were taking British jobs so the country voted to kick them out. Please could you show a link from anywhere that shows them coming back, especially as they were told in no uncertain terms to f*** off back to their own countries.

Pay a decent wage is the obvious answer but if you put up wages you put up prices, you get inflation, said workers are back to square one. In basic terms you have confirmed the lie that ‘ British kids would be queueing up for these jobs ‘ it just wasn’t true, simply hatred towards people that weren’t British or in some posters eyes British citizens that have non sounding British names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, nevermind, neoliberalism has had it said:

Another deluded Dido supporter who wants to get rid of immigrant doctors and nurses in the NHS. She says that we can rid ourselves of immigrant staff in the NHS in two years, another wrecking ball thrown into the air. These 10%/130.000 staff in the NHS she wants rid off have worked their collective guts off to serve this country through a pandemic and before and she is nothing but an errant incompetent failure/money grabber who would like to help to privatise the rest of the NHS to the creeps who are slowly buying up GP surgeries on the sly and other US health care companies.

 

Brilliant, since Brexit, there’s been a massive exit of NHS staff back into the EU, since 2019 the UK have recruited NHS staff from the Philippines, India and other countries outside the EU to fill the massive holes left behind!

Only 30% of nearly 270,000 immigrants came from EU last year the rest were from Middle East, Africa and non EU, out of them only 1% have been refused entry! 
 

The racist bigots on here, have stopped those who actually contributed to our country in terms of growth and finances with free movement but haven’t stopped the influx of immigrants……I can tell you not many Europeans actually want to come to the UK anymore and most in Germany, France and Central Europe really don’t want the Brits there either! Really was a win for Brexit wasn’t it! 
 

One last thing to mention, since 2017, just Poland alone had an increase in nearly 40% of agricultural and produce to the EU, they have been slowly taking up the exports from the UK. That’s just Poland, Estonian, Slovakia and other nations are also gaining massive increases thanks to the UK tariff produce being too expensive.

Edited by Indy
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

 

 

 

Pay a decent wage and you can get the unemployed to do it.  

Again, they have and they still can't get anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did Swindo really say pay a decent wage…..in a shrinking economy, with a benefit system designed to keep the lazy Brits in comfort! 👍😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A serious report into education standards is turned into another part of the culture war. These ****os aren't in the slightest bit interested in fixing the problems facing this country but simply want to keep us divided so we don't notice. 

Get rid of these clowns if you have any affection for this country. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Well b back said:

Another industry not happy they voted leave.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-57503274

 

And that is an  industry that contributes £4.1bn to the UK economy, as opposed to the £1.4bn from fishing. Meanwhile, anyone who is a fan of the theatre of the absurd should take a look at Frost's answer to the HoC committee.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

Ha ha this is so funny, do you realise Iceland are part of the EU vaccine programme and because of that are basically neck and neck with the U.K. on % vaccinated. I think the EU would be the last people that Iceland would be slating at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SwindonCanary said:

They still have not done it, can't they get all the country's to agree 😉 

The EU is not so desparate as "Global Britain". Joining the CPTPP is pretty much worthless, it is all a gesture to reassure idiots like @SwindonCanary that what they voted for isn't a bit ****

Edited by BigFish
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The British government has asked the European Union to extend the grace period before a ban comes into force on the sale of chilled meats and fresh sausages into Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.

I bet the EU will give in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/06/2021 at 12:25, horsefly said:

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear! You've had all this time to google the issue, read the  articles I posted links to, and yet you are still too thick to understand the very simple statement, "For legal purposes treaties are treated as contracts". So very embarrassing!

So you admit the British government didn't sign a treaty with Pfizer, but they actually signed a contract. Which would make you think there is a difference between a treaty and a contract.

Or perhaps you could tell us about the famous Maastricht Contract?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SwindonCanary said:

The British government has asked the European Union to extend the grace period before a ban comes into force on the sale of chilled meats and fresh sausages into Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK.

I bet the EU will give in

Or even if they don’t coco will tell us they did.

Why sign such a hopeless deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Rock The Boat said:

So you admit the British government didn't sign a treaty with Pfizer, but they actually signed a contract. Which would make you think there is a difference between a treaty and a contract.

Or perhaps you could tell us about the famous Maastricht Contract?

Any news on the German / EU deal to manufacture 1.8 billion doses of Pfizer ? Just wondered wether what they signed was a contract or a treaty and wether they will be supplying the U.K. or the US will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, PurpleCanary said:

And that is an  industry that contributes £4.1bn to the UK economy, as opposed to the £1.4bn from fishing. Meanwhile, anyone who is a fan of the theatre of the absurd should take a look at Frost's answer to the HoC committee.

😀

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jun/22/they-might-have-got-more-brexit-sense-out-of-frosty-the-snowman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Rock The Boat said:

So you admit the British government didn't sign a treaty with Pfizer, but they actually signed a contract. Which would make you think there is a difference between a treaty and a contract.

Or perhaps you could tell us about the famous Maastricht Contract?

I ought to be astonished by your willingness to embarrass yourself by repeatedly displaying chronic levels of ignorance, but then I remind myself that you show not the slightest compunction in posting racist, misogynist, and homophobic rants, or abusing the victims of paedophiles.

Are you really so foolish that you don't realise people can see through your laughably transparent attempt to impute to me nonsensical views I have never espoused? Or is it the case that your understanding of the English language is so poor that you can't grasp the meaning of a simple conditional statement. Either way, being a charitable individual, I will try one last time to explain to you something a primary school child has no problem grasping.

My claim is:

 "For legal purposes a treaty is treated as a contract"

Let's break that down for you if it will help, as clearly you struggle with a whole sentence:

First clause: "FOR LEGAL PURPOSES". This clause restricts the context of application of the complete sentence to legal contexts. In other words, it does not claim that what follows in the next clause has any application beyond a legal context. So no, the words "treaty" and "contract" are not being treated as synonyms across all contexts.  Quite simple really, if you just concentrate on the meanings of the words being used. 

Second clause: "a treaty is treated as a contract". Following from the first clause this makes the claim that in legal contexts the obligations agreed to in a treaty are treated as contractual obligations that can be prosecuted in a court of law. If you have followed the dispute over the NI protocol then you would have to be ignorant beyond redemption not to realise that the EU has precisely threatened just such legal action if the UK does not fulfil its obligations.

Really not difficult stuff to understand if you're not blinded by extreme right wing hatred. Neither is it very difficult to google the issue in order to confirm this rather mundane legal point. You could also look up the links I posted explaining the treatment of treaties as contracts. But somehow experience suggests you won't let a mortifying display of the most embarrassing levels of ignorance get in the way of an opportunity to vent hatred and bile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...