Mr Angry 1,555 Posted June 13, 2020 It’ll be ok, Swindon says the Brexit fairy is going to fix everything 🤣🤣🤣 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 13, 2020 2 hours ago, Creative Midfielder said: Which bit of we've already sold 50% of our quota don't you understand???? They've already paid the price and the percentage isn't going to change - the overall size of the pot may change from year to year depending upon the health of the fish stocks but whatever the volume of fish that can be landed from British waters each year, just over half will caught by foreign boats because we have already sold those rights to them. How are they going to take 50% of the quota when they are not allowed in our waters ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,756 Posted June 14, 2020 On 11/06/2020 at 10:40, Herman said: Richard Desmond gave the Conservative Party £12k two weeks after this decision. Jenrick to face urgent question today. More from this dodgy story of Jenrick's. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/14/riddle-of-tory-minister-jenrick-the-media-mogul-and-a-1bn-housing-development Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Creative Midfielder 1,996 Posted June 14, 2020 9 hours ago, SwindonCanary said: How are they going to take 50% of the quota when they are not allowed in our waters ? They are allowed in our waters because they are fishing part of the UK quota - the rights to fish over half the UK quota has been sold by the UK to foreign fishing fleets. It has nothing to do with any quota that the French or Scandanavians may or may not end up with allowing them to fish in UK waters - those quotas will be distributed by those governments although its a pretty safe bet that they will go to their own fisherman. Perhaps instead of warbling on about how unreasonable the EU are, you should be asking why the UK government thought it was a good idea to sell 50+% of the quota we already have to foreign fishing fleets!!! Same question to Paul M who seems to have gone very quiet about his beloved fish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SHRIMPER 328 Posted June 14, 2020 9 hours ago, SwindonCanary said: How are they going to take 50% of the quota when they are not allowed in our waters ? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Creative Midfielder 1,996 Posted June 14, 2020 25 minutes ago, Herman said: More from this dodgy story of Jenrick's. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/14/riddle-of-tory-minister-jenrick-the-media-mogul-and-a-1bn-housing-development Yep, more lies and more corruption - still let's hope he does a 'Cummings' and keeps on telling lies which are quickly shown up as such for as long as possible, far more damaging to the government than a quick resignation and dropping out of sight 🙂 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill 1,788 Posted June 14, 2020 36 minutes ago, Creative Midfielder said: They are allowed in our waters because they are fishing part of the UK quota - the rights to fish over half the UK quota has been sold by the UK to foreign fishing fleets. It has nothing to do with any quota that the French or Scandanavians may or may not end up with allowing them to fish in UK waters - those quotas will be distributed by those governments although its a pretty safe bet that they will go to their own fisherman. Perhaps instead of warbling on about how unreasonable the EU are, you should be asking why the UK government thought it was a good idea to sell 50+% of the quota we already have to foreign fishing fleets!!! Same question to Paul M who seems to have gone very quiet about his beloved fish. What our simple minded poster doesn't seem to grasp as these 'waters' only belong to the UK because others, through agreements etc, acknowledge that. If European fishermen choose to ignore those agreements, as Johnson is now trying to do with the WA, then what is the UK going to do ? Take a case to the European Court of Justice ? As it acknowledges that is doesn't have the naval capacity to enforce that ruling - so what then ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
How I Wrote Elastic Man 1,187 Posted June 14, 2020 11 hours ago, SwindonCanary said: How are they going to take 50% of the quota when they are not allowed in our waters ? The Dutch are currently developing a new fishing technique. They are going to spread millions of tons of little metal filings into the English Channel and North Sea, which will attach themselves to the scales of the fish. They have constructed two giant nets along the coast, one in the south near Middelburg, and one in the north near Alkmaar. Behind the nets they are currently building the LMA´s (Large Magnetic Arrays), which should be operational in around 6 months Once they activate the LMA´s they will be in business 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 Wait and see it, will be sorted at a reduced quota. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Bill said: What our simple minded poster doesn't seem to grasp as these 'waters' only belong to the UK because others, through agreements etc, acknowledge that. If European fishermen choose to ignore those agreements, as Johnson is now trying to do with the WA, then what is the UK going to do ? Take a case to the European Court of Justice ? As it acknowledges that is doesn't have the naval capacity to enforce that ruling - so what then ? Simple answer the Royal Navy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,756 Posted June 14, 2020 Don't mean to demean the whole of the Royal Navy but weren't you part of it once? Left hand down a bit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 UK waters are exactly that. Any previous arrangements are null and void. All nonsensical (and occasionally illegal) threats must be discounted as the bluff and bluster they are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
A Load of Squit 5,161 Posted June 14, 2020 Those 12 boats are going to be very busy. 🙂 https://inews.co.uk/news/brexit/uk-government-only-has-12-boats-to-police-fishing-waters-after-brexit-325005 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, A Load of Squit said: Those 12 boats are going to be very busy. 🙂 https://inews.co.uk/news/brexit/uk-government-only-has-12-boats-to-police-fishing-waters-after-brexit-325005 It's enough, Radar is is very good you know Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
A Load of Squit 5,161 Posted June 14, 2020 22 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said: It's enough, Radar is is very good you know 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill 1,788 Posted June 14, 2020 50 minutes ago, A Load of Squit said: Those 12 boats are going to be very busy. 🙂 https://inews.co.uk/news/brexit/uk-government-only-has-12-boats-to-police-fishing-waters-after-brexit-325005 The reality is that there is not much the UK can do, without recourse to a mutually acceptable arbitration ie EJC 12 boats against dozens of fishing boats - and it would be impossible to keep those boats at sea permanently - that's why those in charge new they were lying when they would up the simple minded brexiteers with their guff about british fish for british boats Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Angry 1,555 Posted June 14, 2020 2 hours ago, SwindonCanary said: It's enough, Radar is is very good you know That’s it-final proof that this is nothing more than a troll account-time to put it in block. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill 1,788 Posted June 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, Mr Angry said: That’s it-final proof that this is nothing more than a troll account-time to put it in block. I don't think he is. From past experience I really think he is as dumb as he comes across - and certainly a liar. however, blocking his nonsense is a necessary step. Others get paid to deal with someone with his condition. None of us on here are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 39 minutes ago, Bill said: I don't think he is. From past experience I really think he is as dumb as he comes across - and certainly a liar. however, blocking his nonsense is a necessary step. Others get paid to deal with someone with his condition. None of us on here are. YOU TOLD THE BIGGEST LIE OF THEM ALL ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SHRIMPER 328 Posted June 14, 2020 I think he has stopped taking his bipolar meds. Best not ask him how his wife is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill 1,788 Posted June 14, 2020 37 minutes ago, SHRIMPER said: I think he has stopped taking his bipolar meds. Best not ask him how his wife is. is she that 'dusky maiden ' ? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SHRIMPER 328 Posted June 14, 2020 I'm sure SWINDO the Loser will explain all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill 1,788 Posted June 14, 2020 In the say way that Ken Dodd could explain his tax returns 😄 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 Two of you will not intimidate me as I was right and you two supported the losers 😄 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kick it off 1,948 Posted June 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Bill said: is she that 'dusky maiden ' ? She's an Instagram model mate. Keep up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill 1,788 Posted June 14, 2020 10 minutes ago, kick it off said: She's an Instagram model mate. Keep up You mean she's not really one of his friends - he just took the photo off the net and tried to pass it off as one of his 'friends' ? next he'll be telling us that he regularly trades on the stock exchange, and he served at Jutland Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 The two of you continue to carry on with the same subject give it up, you known you supported the side Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SHRIMPER 328 Posted June 14, 2020 (edited) IF he was really in the Andrew it would be in BUTTland and not Jutland with his @rse to the bunghole in the barrel. Sippers and gulpers all round. Edited June 14, 2020 by SHRIMPER Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted June 14, 2020 (edited) Shrimper's & KICK IT OFF you supported the wrong side, admit it ! Edited June 14, 2020 by SwindonCanary Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,756 Posted June 14, 2020 A fascistic government. Nazis on the street. Collapsed economy. Thousands dead. No deal brexit. Yes, KIO and Shrimper are on the wrong side.🤨 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
