Jump to content
Jools

The Positive Brexit Thread

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, How I Wrote Elastic Man said:

Do you believe that someone on 80 grand p/a will be left with 2 grand net income p/a?

What are Labours proposals on inheritance tax?

Do you know?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, kick it off said:

After having proved that you expect people to believe you're dating an instagram model young enough to be your granddaughter and that you have a loose grasp of basic arithmetic - I would have thought you'd steer away from this kind of critique given your obvious failings in both areas. Seems self-awareness is lacking sorely too.

wrong on all counts !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Van wink said:

What are Labours proposals on inheritance tax?

Do you know?

 

You can't take it with you when you go😉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, SwindonCanary said:

You would think that people would have learned after the last election when Corbyn offered free tuition at university, then later admitted he didn't know how it would have afforded. Labour left the country with no money last time they were in. There seems to be a generation which refuses to look back on history and wilfully blindly follow people like Corbyn, which is a path to ruin

REPEATED AS IT UPSET SOME ON HERE (The truth always hurts)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

wrong on all counts !

So you didn’t post a picture of Ayanna Jordan and pretend she was ‘Pearl’?

Please explain how your maths makes 43 +4 into more than 50%...? 

Or just admit you’re full of ****

Edited by kick it off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SwindonCanary said:

REPEATED AS IT UPSET SOME ON HERE (The truth always hurts) FVCKWIT is an habitual LIAR

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, ricardo said:

You can't take it with you when you go😉

Give it to magic grandpa.....to spend wisely😯

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, How I Wrote Elastic Man said:

Do you have anything to support this?

The polls in 2017 clearly favoured the Conservatives

Anyone can say they're going to vote for a certain party, but not everyone bothers to go out and vote. 

Edited by Rock The Boat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, A Load of Squit said:

They must all be panicking that their disposable income is going to be devastated.

I expect they'll all join Dyson in Singapore.

 

Singapore's gain is our loss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, keelansgrandad said:

I see Boris has to have his picture on the front of their manifesto. Nothing like a bit of narcissism.

Putting Corbyn on the front of the Labour manifesto would be a vote-loser. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

REPEATED AS IT UPSET SOME ON HERE (The truth always hurts)

The truth hurts indeed. You’re an ignorant, thick, simple minded and racist bigot. Oh, and a compulsive liar and fantasist too 🤐

  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kick it off said:

I read that fake manifesto costings at Guido last Thursday -- Where's the real one?

 

WhatsApp-Image-2019-11-21-at-12.15.11.jp

As in 2017, Corbyn has attempted to address the public’s concerns about the cost of his proposals by claiming Labour’s 2019 manifesto is ‘fully costed’.

According to Labour’s supplementary “Funding Real Change” ‘Grey Book’, their spending plans come to a pocket change amount of merely £82.9 billion, and their tax rises meet this amount pound-for-pound.

The claimed amount of tax each increase will raise are frankly fanciful. The document says that whacking up corporation tax will raise £30 billion, ignoring the fact that the corporation tax cuts that the Coalition government brought in actually raised revenue. The proposed yield from the financial transactions tax is frankly fanciful. Changed behaviour would wipe out receipts…

The document also has some enormous spending omissions:

  • Labour’s £400 billion ‘national transformation fund’ – including a £250 billion Green Transformation Fund and a £150 Social Transformation Fund
  • Their 4-day working week – estimated to cost £17 billion a year in public sector wages
  • All Labour’s nationalisation programmes, including water, rail, energy and the royal mail – estimated by the CBI to cost £196 billion

Guido hopes broadcasters will remind any Labour politicians of these glaring black holes if they claim the manifesto’s fully costed…

Read Labour’s pretend costing document below…

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/436176416/Labour-s-Costing-Document#from_embed

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All you remainers can throw what you like at me, it's water off a ducks back, We will be out by the end of the year and Britain will be better for it !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Herman said:

In its simplest, concentrated form, why are Brexiters wanting to cost every policy idea except Brexit itself? 

Gosh. Modesty aside I have to say that was a very fair rhetorical question. The mid- and long-term damage to the economy by even the least harmful sort of Brexit that Johnson (if he wins) will end up producing will make a mockery of his election lies...sorry, his promises.
 

As to the most harmful, the distinct possibility of the UK crashing out without a deal at the end of 2020, I would say look for a lifeboat, but there won't be nearly enough to go around...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

All you remainers can throw what you like at me, it's water off a ducks back, We will be out by the end of the year and Britain will be better for it !

We won't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, SwindonCanary said:

All you remainers can throw what you like at me, it's water off a ducks back, We will be out by the end of the year and Britain will be better for it !

Nobody is "throwing" anything at you. You're being hung by your own petard.

We cannot be out by the end of the year. Literally impossible. There is not enough sitting time for parliament to get through all the readings.... do you ever get anything right? Tick Tock, happy halloween.

I'm still unsure as to why you haven't explained your mathematical formulae for converting 43+4 into over 50?

Image result for matt damon good will hunting maths

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Rock The Boat said:

What was the figure on the side of the bus? £350m? 

 

IMG_20191124_234124.jpg

Heard it all before .The facts :

In 2015, the government promised to increase the number of GPs by 5,000 by 2020 but it is now predicted that GP shortages in England will almost triple to 7,000 by 2023/24.

A study by the Nuffield Trust found that the number of GPs per 100,000 people has fallen from nearly 65 in 2014 to 60 last year.

And the number of GP practices in England had fallen by 263 in the 12 months to 1 July 2018, official data reveal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MooreMarriot said:

Heard it all before .The facts :

In 2015, the government promised to increase the number of GPs by 5,000 by 2020 but it is now predicted that GP shortages in England will almost triple to 7,000 by 2023/24.

A study by the Nuffield Trust found that the number of GPs per 100,000 people has fallen from nearly 65 in 2014 to 60 last year.

And the number of GP practices in England had fallen by 263 in the 12 months to 1 July 2018, official data reveal.

The trick is, you have to vote in a Boris government first, and the policies then get implemented. The new funding will mean an extra 50,000,000 GP appointments per year

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Rock The Boat said:

The trick is, you have to vote in a Boris government first, and the policies then get implemented. The new funding will mean an extra 50,000,000 GP appointments per year

That will require the recruiting and training of 6,000 more general practitioners and 6,000 more primary care doctors and retaining all current GPs.

There is no chance whatever that will happen .

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 23/11/2019 at 09:31, Herman said:

It will be interesting to see polling after last night's debate.

 

Yes it is interesting, Labour are the same but it looks like Boris has taken votes from the Brexit party, increasing his lead !

Party support: 23 November 2019

Party Average (%) Likely range
CON 41 (37-45)
LAB 29 (25-33)
LD 15 (11-19)
BRX 6 (2-10)
SNP 4 --*
GRN 3 (0-7)
UKIP 0 --*
PC 0 --*
TIGfC 0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, A Load of Squit said:

So 50,000 new nurses is a lie.

That didn't take long.

After the debacle with the new  hospitals claim you'd think the Tories would get someone on thier team who could do maths.

 

Bump. What a scam. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canvassing for the Labour Party in the area and if it anything to go by it is going to be a close run thing in our electorate. LAbour ran the Tory close last time and many people who would have voted Tory say they will vote LibDem. But that is a strange one as Cornwall voted to Leave. But the LibDems were a long way behind before after the coalition farce. SO it could leave the way clear for Labour.

Puzzled is the word.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...