DumbleDelia is Magic 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Here is a list of every signing Worthington has made since he has been in charge (in the order they signed). How many worked out?Zema Abbey- December 2000. £300,000Alex Notman- December 2000. £250,000Danny Bloomfield- January 2001. FreeAdam Drury- March 2001. £500,000Gary Holt- March 2001. £100,000Paul Peschisolido- March 2001. LoanPaul Chichton- June 2001. £150,000Clint Easton- June 2001. £100,000Mark Rivers- June 2001. £500,000Neil Emblen- July 2001. £500,000Marc Libbra- August 2001. FreeDavid Nielsen- December 2001. Loan then £200,000Andy Roberts- Janurary 2002- LoanTrevor Benjamin- February 2002. LoanNicky Southall- September 2002. LoanKeith Briggs- January 2003. £65,000David Healy- February 2003. LoanLeigh Bromby- February 2003. LoanJim Brennan- July 2003. FreeDamien Francis- July 2003. £260,000Marc Edworthy- August 2003. FreeElvis Hammons- August 2003. LoanPeter Crouch- Septmeber 2003. LoanKevin Harper- September 2003. LoanDarren Huckerby- September 2003. Loan then £750,000Leon McKenzie- December 2003. £350,000Mathias Svensson- December 2003. £75,000Kevin Cooper- March 2004. LoanDavid Bentley- June 2004. LoanPaul Gallacher- June 2004. FreeYoussef Safri- June 2004. £500,000Thomas Helveg- July 2004. FreeSimon Charlton- July 2004. £250,000Darren Ward- August 2004. £250,000Gary Doherty- August 2004. £600,000Mathias Jonson- August 2004. £600,000Dean Ashton- January 2005. £3MGraham Stuart- January 2005. FreeMattieu Louis Jean- June 2005. Part ex (free)Jason Jarrett- June 2005. FreeJurgen Colin- July 2005. £263,000Andy Hughes- July 2005. £500,000Peter Thorne- July 2005. FreeDean Marney- August 2005. LoanKevin Lisbie- September 2005. LoanCalum Davenport- Septmber 2005. LoanDickson Etuhu- November 2005. LoanDavid Wright- November 2005. LoanCarl Robinson- November 2005. Loan (presumably)Ok. So 5 years, almost half a century of players, 19 loan players and a stonking £9,613,000 (of course all excluding wages) how many have been "successes". I''ve highlighted the one''s I think have been. Oh dear god! 11 out of 49 players! Ok, it''s hard to judge the recent loanees and players such as Marney and Notman are hard to judge because of injuries. However, (IMAO) after 5 years and almost £10M Worthington has only generated a team full of good players. Imagine if we had had a manager who knew how to spend to money. Where would we be now? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Temp the Revelator 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Zema Abbey- December 2000. £300,000 Alex Notman- December 2000. £250,000 Danny Bloomfield- January 2001. Free Adam Drury- March 2001. £500,000 Gary Holt- March 2001. £100,000 Paul Peschisolido- March 2001. Loan Paul Chichton- June 2001. £150,000 Clint Easton- June 2001. £100,000 Mark Rivers- June 2001. £500,000 Neil Emblen- July 2001. £500,000 Marc Libbra- August 2001. Free David Nielsen- December 2001. Loan then £200,000 Andy Roberts- Janurary 2002- Loan Trevor Benjamin- February 2002. Loan Nicky Southall- September 2002. Loan Keith Briggs- January 2003. £65,000 David Healy- February 2003. Loan Leigh Bromby- February 2003. Loan Jim Brennan- July 2003. Free Damien Francis- July 2003. £260,000 Marc Edworthy- August 2003. Free Elvis Hammons- August 2003. Loan Peter Crouch- Septmeber 2003. Loan Kevin Harper- September 2003. Loan Darren Huckerby- September 2003. Loan then £750,000 Leon McKenzie- December 2003. £350,000 Mathias Svensson- December 2003. £75,000 Kevin Cooper- March 2004. Loan David Bentley- June 2004. Loan Paul Gallacher- June 2004. Free Youssef Safri- June 2004. £500,000 Thomas Helveg- July 2004. Free Simon Charlton- July 2004. £250,000 Darren Ward- August 2004. £250,000 Gary Doherty- August 2004. £600,000 Mathias Jonson- August 2004. £600,000 Dean Ashton- January 2005. £3M Graham Stuart- January 2005. Free Mattieu Louis Jean- June 2005. Part ex (free) Jason Jarrett- June 2005. Free Jurgen Colin- July 2005. £263,000 Andy Hughes- July 2005. £500,000 Peter Thorne- July 2005. Free Dean Marney- August 2005. Loan Kevin Lisbie- September 2005. Loan Calum Davenport- Septmber 2005. Loan Dickson Etuhu- November 2005. Loan David Wright- November 2005. Loan Carl Robinson- November 2005. Loan (presumably)There you go DD, I''ve updated it with my opinion - I agree with all the ones you said, plus I have added some - even so, it does make pretty depressing reading, doesn''t it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mook 0 Posted November 24, 2005 I think you''ve been harsh on a few players there, DD.Doherty is a success, Svensson was definitely a success, goalkeepers were always going to be backups and Rivers, Easton and Nielsen all contributed to an excellent play-off season. Also he made a lot out of our "reserves" - Kenton, Malky, McVeigh etc.But all in all you are correct. 10m is a lot of money.Here''s another one for you - how many of them IMPROVED after coming to Norwich? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BedsCanary 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Rivers, Libbra and Nielsen all did their part and Svennson''s goals came in more than handy in our promotion season. Yes, they''ve come and gone but who knows where we''d be without these players?Bit harsh on Thorne, Etuhu and Wright, too - none of which have had chance to "prove" themselves just yet.Apart from that I agree Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Aldrich 0 Posted November 24, 2005 And even more importantly how many are doing better since they LEFT Norwich - Peschisolido scored a few for Sheff Utd/Derby, Rivers scored one or two for Crewe, Crouch now playing in the Prem/Champions League, Bentley playing in the Prem for Blackburn, Healy scored one or two for Leeds, Francis playing for Wigan in the Prem and Bromby looks to be on the way to the Prem with Sheff Utd. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobbyg 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Whilst I can''t and won''t argue with the points you make I think you are being harsh.Firstly on some of the individual cases. Safri is a success but Doherty isn''t - for the same money.Kevin Cooper - on loan played every game in our unbeaten run on the way to the title. Would have bought him but for the price.Matty Svensson - for £75k helping us to promotion and leaving to return to his homeland for a fee.Easton and Libbra - for a combined £100k helping us to the play-off final where we earnt a lot more than £100k. Secondly not really Worthy''s fault.EmblenAbbeyNotmanWard - has only been on the pitch twice.Gallacher - has never been on the pitch. Louis-Jean - only ben on the pitch twice. Thirdly the loans - in some cases they were never meant to be successes. They were there to try and do a job in the time of need i.e. to allow us to actually get a team out. We were never in the market to be them.BrombyHammondLisbieHealySouthallBenjaminRoberts Fourthly on paper who argued against the following players at the time... who subsequently failed to deliver or live up to their CV''s.Helveg - Denmark CaptainJonsson - International just scored in Euro 2004Bentley - U21 the new BergkampGallacher - International GK on a freeThorne - on a free, proven record Brennan - on a free proven championship playerCharlton - 400 games in the top flight for £250KRivers - 60 goals in the championship, could play wide right. LastlyReally is harsh to include Wright, Dickson and Robinson on the list. And Marney who has more assists than any other player this season.Hughes - Holt wasn''t a success in his first 3 months here. In fact he was awful. Only Emblens injury that gave him a place in middle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
charlies dad 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Amid the wreckage of this season, one bright spot has been the consistent performance level of Doherty. Enough, i think to earn him a bold type rating of success, and i feel sure, a player of the season award. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rudolph Hucker 0 Posted November 24, 2005 dd this is well researched. Do you by any chance have a list of players who played under Worthington who he didn''t bring in and were a success? I know he cleared out some real deadwood when he first came in but what about the likes of McKay and McVeigh? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kennyfoggo 0 Posted November 24, 2005 I thought the other Irish blarney merchant bought Notman Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tumbleweed 106 Posted November 24, 2005 So that''s around 50 players in exactly 5 years: 10 a year. Add the youth players who are privileged to sit on the bench before being loaned out and sold and you must get to 60 new faces.12 new faces a year. And we wonder why we can''t play as a team. they must wonder who is going to turn up next- maybe Lord Lucan will pop up at right wing?And Mook- I suspect the answer to your question is distressingly few. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted November 24, 2005 be interesting to see how many players worthy has offloaded in this time. and indeed how much for? he never seems to want to negotiate a fee for anyone. i remember that we sold Adrian Forbes for £95,000 to luton and he was the most we recived for a player in years under worthy! certainly until last seasonjas :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Boy 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Pointless and (intentionally) misleading to include those players who haven''t been able to play because of injury, or haven''t been here long enough, so:Zema Abbey- December 2000. £300,000 Danny Bloomfield- January 2001. Free Adam Drury- March 2001. £500,000 Gary Holt- March 2001. £100,000 Paul Peschisolido- March 2001. Loan Paul Crichton- June 2001. £150,000 Clint Easton- June 2001. £100,000 Mark Rivers- June 2001. £500,000 Neil Emblen- July 2001. £500,000 Marc Libbra- August 2001. Free David Nielsen- December 2001. Loan then £200,000 Andy Roberts- Janurary 2002- Loan Trevor Benjamin- February 2002. Loan Nicky Southall- September 2002. Loan Keith Briggs- January 2003. £65,000 David Healy- February 2003. Loan Leigh Bromby- February 2003. Loan Jim Brennan- July 2003. Free Damien Francis- July 2003. £260,000 Marc Edworthy- August 2003. Free Elvis Hammond- August 2003. Loan Peter Crouch- Septmeber 2003. Loan Kevin Harper- September 2003. Loan Darren Huckerby- September 2003. Loan then £750,000 Leon McKenzie- December 2003. £350,000 Mathias Svensson- December 2003. £75,000 Kevin Cooper- March 2004. Loan David Bentley- June 2004. Loan Youssef Safri- June 2004. £500,000 Thomas Helveg- July 2004. Free Simon Charlton- July 2004. £250,000 Gary Doherty- August 2004. £600,000 Mathias Jonson- August 2004. £600,000 Dean Ashton- January 2005. £3M Graham Stuart- January 2005. Free Jason Jarrett- June 2005. Free Jurgen Colin- July 2005. £263,000 Andy Hughes- July 2005. £500,000 Dean Marney- August 2005. Loan Kevin Lisbie- September 2005. Loan Calum Davenport- September 2005. Loan Interesting to see the very same worms who were moaning that we MUST SIGN MORE PLAYERS now turning, and complaining that we''ve signed too many. About sums them up. Also interesting that with all these "failures" we escaped the relegation that was looming when NW took over, made the play-offs, and then won the Championship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DumbleDelia is Magic 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Errm I think you''re missing the point old boy. The point was to illustrate just how BADLY Worthington has done in the transfer market. Yes I want a bigger squad. However, I want a squad of decent players that improve the team. Even with your revised list you only have 19 out of 41 players who were ''successes''. Still pretty damn pathetic from my point of view. The only reason we won the Championship was because we signed an awesome player in Hucks, had the luck of the Irish and had little or no injuries Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maverick 0 Posted November 24, 2005 You''re all being severely harsh on Rivers.He played an instrumental part in the play off season and the following season too.Then he got injured after a few games of the championship winning season and at that point he was top scorer.Once he was fit again Hucks et al had arrived and the bar had moved upwards.Worthy deemed him to be surplus to requirements for the Prem and he was right to do so but I still think we got our money''s worth from him.I know he was an infuriating inconsistent winger but we have one of them now don''t we ? Rivers was definitely better at tracking back than our current version.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Boy 0 Posted November 24, 2005 Your point is not missable - it''s obvious what you''re trying to do from the way you fiddled your initial list.. 19 out of 41 is "pretty damn pathetic" is it? It may be, but you should have a look at our rivals to get something to judge it by. You criticise NW for signing rubbish players, then say that we only won promotion because he made a brilliant signing. You say we should be leading the division despite our injury problems this season, then say we won promotion because we had next to no injuries. Despite the current hysteria, which you''ve really bought into having been the one IIRC to coin the silly Keep The Faith tag, we are in mid-table with no realistic threat of relegation, we have a squad that is without doubt better than it was a couple of years ago, and we don''t need half-baked rabble-rousing crap like this thread. What we need (I say again) is a reasoned look at the problems within the Club - the failure to improve certain aspects in line with the growth and the stated ambitions of the club. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DumbleDelia is Magic 0 Posted November 25, 2005 Fiddled my initial list?? How can a comprehensive list of every signing the man has ever made have been ''fiddled''?I think you''re getting a bit confused old boy. Not once have I said we would be leading the division if it wasn''t for our injuries. I don''t think the squad we have is good enough. Even if all our players we''re fit (which incidently is really only Leon and Marney whom we''re missing) we''d still be where we are now due to an inept manager.You say that we''re in mid table with ''no real thread of relegation''. Is that how far we''ve come on since we first got promoted? Now pleased that we might not get relegated to the third tier of English football. Give me a break. (By the by; we have a very realistic chance of getting relegated at the moment. Certainly a hell of a lot better chance than we have of getting promoted).We don''t need "half-baked rabble-rousing crap like this" do we? And why is that? Because the bloody thruth hurts that''s why. We need a "reasoned look at the problems within the club"? I totally agree. Start with the management. It''s people like you old boy who the club probably rolled out at the AGM. You make my blood boil. You have your head in the sand with the current plight of the club and when you finally pull it out you''ll realise we''re the next Nottm Forest, not the next Charlton. Our club is in turmoil for the first team in half a decade. Face facts. Worthington got us up. Fair play to him for that. But we have endured a load of crap in the last 18 months and it is entirely down to him. His inept signings and inept management style. The sooner people like you realise this the better Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ken Aries 0 Posted November 25, 2005 I''ve looked at your list and tried to assess those Worthy signings with a less jaundiced eye. I just looked at those players that commanded a transfer fee - fair I think, because after all, what do you really expect for nothing? Anyway, of the 22 who cost City a transfer fee, I think that most people would agree that at least 13 did a good job for a while, which represents an over 50% success rate in Worthy''s signings. Within that tally of 13 of which I said some served a purpose, but then began to lose form, you will find 9 who everybody would agree are, or were, unqualified successes. I think you''ll find few managers throughout the Football League with a better record than that. Apologies for not naming the players that my figures represent - I just couldn''t be bothered with all that typing! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DumbleDelia is Magic 0 Posted November 25, 2005 But Stephen, "frees" aren''t free. Firstly, if we get a player on a free we give them a signing on fee. I''d hate to think what a Jarrett''s was. However, I''d be willing to bet it was more than £65,000 we paid for Briggs. Add onto this wages, bonuses etc and each player costs a fair chunk Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mook 0 Posted November 25, 2005 Dad, from someone that accused me of being "polyanna" about NCFC, now hark at you!"Mid-table with no real threat of relegation"???? What a load of rubbish. How far off the relegation zone are we, having played EVERY team in the division once? What does that make you think if we have to play them all again? This time we''ll win them all?You need to be very careful with the "too good to go down" mentality. I watched a bunch of Hammers do that at close proximity and it''s not pretty, plus Leeds fans, and Sheff Wed too.Rabble rousing is not what this is about, at least mostly. It''s an honest (in DD''s opinion) assessment of what Nigel has brought to the club, albeit a slightly biased one in favour of the negative (in my opinion).But DD has a point - we''ve had 50 players, and with your philosophy of "buy the best and it will last", surely you can''t think that all the "stop-gap" measures we''ve had over the years have been good for the club, manager or style of football we play? Someone needs to point out these failings, and what DD has done is given a stark reminder of how many players we''ve had over the years, and how much money has been spent. Suddenly all of Warnock''s remarks about how much Norwich spent seem a bit more reasonable... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rieg77 0 Posted November 25, 2005 It all depends how you measure success.For instance, you say that Rivers was not a success. I think he was very successful before it went pear shaped between him and the club. It also depends why they were bougnt.Brennan contributes as a good squad player so if thats why he was bought then he''s been successfulTotally disagree with you onRivers BrennanSvenssonCooperDohertyHughes Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mello Yello 2,140 Posted November 25, 2005 There''s only ever been one successful signing by Worthy, and that is his signing on the dotted line of his ''Wahaaay!''.........."lucrative" contract, that currently has this Club and "Board" - gripped tightly around the ''horlicks!''KEEP THE FILTH and ON THE FALL CITY! ;~( Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Boy 0 Posted November 25, 2005 Of course you fiddled your inital list DD: you start by using a metric - "success" - that''s totally subjective (and of course your assessment is slanted in the way that suits your argument), you included players with long-term injuries who hardly played a match, players who only arrived recently, players who came on a month''s loan whom you probably never saw, players on loan who were here as cover, and players who were bought as cover and have never been involved. Strip those out and look at the list again, and you''ll see that, as NW has had more money available to buy quality, the proportion of successes has increased. He''s certainly signed quite a few clunkers (most of whom were warmly greeted by you and the other snipers), but then every manager does that. Have you done that comparison with another club yet, on a cost/benefit basis, showing what it''s achieved for what it''s spent? Until you do that, your numbers are meaningless, just designed to undermine, Mr Keep The Faith. And in case you''ve forgotten, what this Club''s achieved in the past five years is a Play-off final, a Championship, a year in the Premiership, a much healthier financial position, and a greatly increased attendance. If you''re talking in pure financial terms, NW''s actually done pretty well.And Mook - we won''t be relegated. By you own argument, if the second legs of our matches all go the same way as the first legs, and theirs do as well, we''ll end up in our current position. But we won''t go down mainly because we''re playing decent football MOST OF THE TIME. Not ALL OF THE TIME, not even ENOUGH OF THE TIME for me, but, in terms of minutes MOST OF THE TIME. You know, Mook, how strongly I feel about the coaching issue, about how it should add value to players, and at Norwich it doesn''t, but, really, let''s just look at the facts. We are mid-table in the Championship, and we won''t be relegated UNLESS - as I said before - the Club panics like a number of posters on here are doing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
We need a Manager 0 Posted November 25, 2005 Playing decent football ? jesus what planet are you on . As for Nigels signings laughable is the best word to describe them , and even a good one like Ashton he can ruin in 6 months . Ashton playing for Crewe 20 goals at xmas Ashton playing for Worthys hoofers probably wont have 20 attempts by xmas this year . Thorne regular goalscorer for Cardiff cannot get 1 for Norwich , you see the pattern ? Worthy can take good players and make them bad , hell i bet he could get Chelsea relegated given the chance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mook 0 Posted November 25, 2005 Ok pops, fair enough. But I think you are being a little .... understanding towards Mr Worthington and our signature-happy board.We have spent a lot of money that has gone utterly unrecouped, because we are both buying the wrong players and buying players for them to be left on the bench or badly coached. I am not saying that other clubs don''t buy badly, but this is (and here''s the killer line) YOUR money. Your shares, your season ticket, your shares (second time round), your purchasing of the clubs merchandise etc etc. And we all know, a lot of this wastage could be avoided through research and scouting.It is, whether you like it or not, and indictment on the manager, his scouts and the board for shelling out whatever is asked of them without seeming to do their research - ie 1m (plus wages) for Mat Jonson who is the only right winger I''ve ever seen that can''t cross, pass, tackle, shoot or dribble. I mean, didn''t they watch the videos??What have the Romans ever done for us? Well apart from the play-offs, the aquaducts and the championship, not much. We blew the prem badly, and the money we have earned will not last forever (just ask a Leeds/Ipsw*ch fan). If more gets wasted this way, and no improvement is seen, we could be in stasis for a long time to come. I''m not saying this statistic means we should sack Nigel, but someone should be keeping tabs on his spending and looking over his shoulder. If your employees made this many mistakes with other people''s money, you''d check their work too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I am a Banana (All Grown Up) 0 Posted November 25, 2005 r u nut wat bout andy hughes he is the new francis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Boy 0 Posted November 25, 2005 [quote user="premier1"]Playing decent football ? jesus what planet are you on . As for Nigels signings laughable is the best word to describe them , and even a good one like Ashton he can ruin in 6 months . Ashton playing for Crewe 20 goals at xmas Ashton playing for Worthys hoofers probably wont have 20 attempts by xmas this year . Thorne regular goalscorer for Cardiff cannot get 1 for Norwich , you see the pattern ? Worthy can take good players and make them bad , hell i bet he could get Chelsea relegated given the chance.[/quote]What was Thorne''s strike rate for Cardiff, in goals per minute played, and how many minutes has Thorne played for us? Do you actually know who Thorne is BTW, or did you just wander in out of the snow?Ashton''s certainly not been short of goal attempts. If you''d seen any of our games this season, you''d know that. You ought to try it - you might enjoy football once you got to understand it.More factoids.... Keep ''em coming. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rossi 0 Posted November 25, 2005 One thing it also does, is look at the awful lot of prudence and not a lot of ambition. Under £10m in 5 years. Heck we should have spent that last season when we were promoted. Then we would still be there and not here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites