Less than 100 days to go

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

Reading and listening to the talks that are being organised and who goes to them, one gets the distinct expression of convulsive sphincters on behalf of the ''disabled together ''campaign, JB.I think Banksy is so spot onhttps://twitter.com/thereaIbanksy/status/506226623931514880/photo/1this comment from one of the most impressive blogs there are currently speaking of the campaign, Craig Murrays.the chap is called JG and he said this about a recent local meeting.

"I was at the meeting in Cupar, my first active participation in

anything organised in the campaign. The breadth of people there was

notable, as was the lack of political party involvement. This appeared

neither needed or wanted. The campaign is very much not owned by the

SNP. I am optimistic that a yes vote will lead to a shake up generating

new parties that will genuinely represent people and wash away the

stagnant current crop of timeservers and lickspittles.

Craig made a very good observation at Cupar. He said that judging by

the posters he saw, the fields were voting no, but the houses were

voting yes. I have to concur as this matches my observation. Given the

number of people actually occupying fields is rather low, they won’t

represent very many votes. No support is fragile and falling.

The odds given by bookies at the moment must be driven by betting in

the UK as a whole. Anyone on the ground in Scotland has to know the

reality is different from the picture painted in the media. It would be

interesting to see a geographical breakdown of betting trends. There

could be money to be made!"

[JB 0]

Craig Murray`s about! Lock up the whisky and hide the strippers!

[ricardo 7,385]

[quote user="nevermind"]

The odds given by bookies at the moment must be driven by betting in

the UK as a whole. Anyone on the ground in Scotland has to know the

reality is different from the picture painted in the media. It would be

interesting to see a geographical breakdown of betting trends. There

could be money to be made!"

[/quote]The odds are driven by the many opinion polls that have been taken, none of which show a lead for "Yes".I personally don''t care what happens either way but you have to ask yourself why you can walk into a Glasgow betting shop and get 4-1 if it''s so obvious that "Yes" will win. I would have thought the Scots ought to be filling their boots.

[Joanna Grey 0]

JB wrote the following post at 01/09/2014 4:23 PM:

"Craig Murray`s about! Lock up the whisky and hide the strippers!"

Thanks for that JB, I never knew that nevermind''s mate was like ''that''.

I should have guessed I suppose.

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

JB is running out of arguments, thats why he''s getting personal. Craigs St. Andrews speech, available on the internet and on his site, has been watched over 65.000 times, last time I looked, he''s honest, a true Independent, although leaning to the right, and he''s got a lot of time for people, he listens to them.whatever tabloidal excretions some regurgitate,stuff that is years old, part of a home/foreing office smear campaign which has no relelvance to this campaign at all.latest poll, oh dear there are sterling rumbles ahead.http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/09/02/uk-markets-sterling-idUKKBN0GX0MS20140902?type=GCA-ForeignExchange

[JB 0]

 

Sorry nevermind couldn`t resist an old joke about an old joke, right leaning? Hmm...

Like many I don`t really care which way the vote goes but if the jocks do vote yes then things will get interesting. Its all very well Mr Darling telling the scots they would be better as part of the UK but remember this is a man who said that the first he knew of the crisis at RBS was when someone phoned him in the early hours to inform him that said bank was about to run out of money. I assumed he was telling porkies but after reading his autobiography {or rather part of it because it was so `dry`} I honestly believe the man was just another naïve stuffed shirt plonked into position by the faceless ones, a sort of less dopey version of Flowers. 

 

 

 

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

Panic, schock horror, the whole R4Toady programme, not a mistake, was full of jitters, interviews with Darling, oh dear what are we going to do?The No campaign was never ahead and the You Gov push polling over the last few weeks has been exposed. The yes campaign was always ahead, the establishment, the better together campaign and the BBC all failed to scare and bully the Scottish to stay in this tired union.thank you Scotland for opening the crusty eyelids of every Englishman to the last unreformed vestige of this broken union, the last bastion for financial scoundrels tax evaders and local Governments who pervert the cause of justice to keep in power.Thanks Scotland for re-opening the debate over a vastly expensive, tired old Trident system and the extra billions it will cost us to establish this pile of contentious glowing scrap down here in England.http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/09/tyler-durden/uk-establishment-in-full-panic-mode/

[hexem 0]

It is good to know that we can always rely on nevermind for a happy monday''s post.Are there no blogs about babies...?he...oops.

[Herman 9,756]

The only thing i listen for now is James Naughtie''s ire whenever bagpipes are played.

[JB 0]

Countless thousands if not millions of people across the globe would give their right hand to live in England, perhaps this `glowing scrapyard` is not so bad after all. Nevermind, do you really need to insult this country in which you choose to live?

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

Excellent reasoning by Jim Sillars. This is the full interview which was later cut to nothing by the BBC.For some reason the establishment does not want to let go of Scotland, fearing chaos will ensue in the 14th. most richest country on earth.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WWtRmSJFLs#t=195The SBC will soon be purged of those who played Westminsters tune, not long now. But you will be able to see with your own eyes what the BBC did not want you to see, masses of people who will vote Yes.http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2014/09/glasgow-greets-its-imperial-masters/

[JB 0]

Afternoon nevermind, it gives me no pleasure to slag off Jim Sillars who I regard as a man of substance but lets be honest here, the man is a political child. Lions led by donkeys? Decent men led by salmonidae idiots more like.

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

''It gives me no pleasure'' he says and then proceeds to go for the person with all the niceties JB is able to muster, but fails to tackle any of the arguments. Queen has nothing to say in Constitutional matters, indeed in any matter bar the one''s she announces on behalf of Government.Heyho what a big fat joke that is, she is no different to anyone else, worried about her interests alone she''s berating the people of Scotland who most likely have debated and argued more over this issue the last two years than she has. She deserves a great reckoning, so does RBS and Deutsche Bank. These companies have done us all a favour, now we know who is stifling progress for the majority and who to avoid in future.

[JB 0]

Nevermind, if I was a scot I would not be scared of independence but scared of the SNP. The system we have is bad enough but to let loose a load of lefties and their nutcase anti everything agenda will be a disaster, full bloodied socialism simply does not work.

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

Aviva is scared for some reason, but its irrelevant, just as the twaddle we hear from DB and others, as well as the bias from every BBC radio station, as if they had to persuade us not to vote Yes.Why do these companies feel as if they are being recruited to be the siren urchins for the establishment and political party puppets that are threatening and bullying Scottish voters. Does this little list of companies not realise that this will backfire in future because people on both sides of the border realise that they don''t have to deal with them, that there are others they can spent their money with.This is followed by the threat, or insult to the Scottish people muttered in self interest after church, when one should have been contemplated and peaceful in one''s response.The polls must be lying or not taking in the vast amount of young voters and those who never voted. read for an impartial view of two stalls on Sauchiehall street in Glasgow yesterday.http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2014/09/referendum-conundrum/#comment-479775

[ricardo 7,385]

[quote user="nevermind"]Aviva is scared for some reason, but its irrelevant, just as the twaddle we hear from DB and others, as well as the bias from every BBC radio station, as if they had to persuade us not to vote Yes.Why do these companies feel as if they are being recruited to be the siren urchins for the establishment and political party puppets that are threatening and bullying Scottish voters. Does this little list of companies not realise that this will backfire in future because people on both sides of the border realise that they don''t have to deal with them, that there are others they can spent their money with.This is followed by the threat, or insult to the Scottish people muttered in self interest after church, when one should have been contemplated and peaceful in one''s response.The polls must be lying or not taking in the vast amount of young voters and those who never voted. read for an impartial view of two stalls on Sauchiehall street in Glasgow yesterday.http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2014/09/referendum-conundrum/#comment-479775[/quote]The polls are wrong. That''s the standard response to any poll that you don''t like.I have no axe to grind and no skin in the game so I couldn''t really care less if the Scots want to dance off down the road behind the Pied Piper Salmond. Looking at it dispassionately it looks like its going to be a "NO" vote and I see that Betfair is now paying out on "NO" as the winner.Whatever the result one thing is certain because it''s quite clear to me that a large proportion of Scots are going to be very unhappy come Friday morning. Whether it be the "YES ers" or the "NO ers" it makes little difference because a level of uncertainty has been stirred up that will continue to cause economic problems both sides of the border for years to come.As I remarked weeks ago..........This won''t end well.

[JB 0]

Yes or no I will be glad when this blasted referendum is over. Bad enough listening to the Westminster traitors but Salmond takes the biscuit with his Marxist drivel, thank dog most people grow out of this infantile nonsense.

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

Wild accusations of violence and intimidation have been grossly over-egged and Millibands default for calling the vote into questions have been sidelined. This from the chairman of the Scottish police federation.

"In response to increased press reports and

comment implying increased crime and disorder as a consequence of the

Independence Referendum Brian Docherty, Chairman of the Scottish Police Federation said;

“The Police Service of Scotland and the men and women who work in it

should not be used as a political football at any time and especially so

in these last few hours of the referendum campaign.

As I have previously stated the referendum debate has been robust but overwhelmingly good natured.

It was inevitable that the closer we came to the 18th of September

passions would increase but that does not justify the exaggerated

rhetoric that is being deployed with increased frequency. Any neutral

observer could be led to believe Scotland is on the verge of societal

disintegration yet nothing could be further from the truth.

Scotland’s citizens are overwhelmingly law abiding and tolerant and

it is preposterous to imply that by placing a cross in a box, our

citizens will suddenly abandon the personal virtues and values held dear

to them all.

At this time it is more important than ever that individuals be they

politicians, journalists or whoever should carefully consider their

words, maintain level heads and act with respect. Respect is not

demonstrated by suggesting a minority of mindless idiots are

representative of anything. One of the many joys of this campaign has

been how it has awakened political awareness across almost every single

section of society. The success enjoyed by the many should not be

sullied by the actions of the few.

Police officers must be kept free from the distractions of rhetoric

better suited to the playground that the political stump. If crime has

been committed it will be investigated and dealt with appropriately but

quite simply police officers have better things to do than officiate in

spats on social media and respond to baseless speculation of the

potential for disorder on and following polling day”

http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2014/09/police-rebut-unionist-smears/

Tomorrow is Scottish Independence day!

[ricardo 7,385]

[quote user="nevermind"]

Tomorrow is Scottish Independence day!

[/quote]Stranger things have happened but it still looks highly unlikely to me. I''ve forecast 55/45 all along so it will be interesting to see how far out I am.Whatever the result I''m sad to say that so much has been stirred up that it will inevitably be bad news for Scotland. A great shame, but then we all know that nationalism is an ugly beast.

[JB 0]

Another thinly disguised post against any kind of authority. Nevermind, perhaps you would like the police to dress up as `Ronald McDonald` and hand out lollipops to lefties who throw rocks or kick the police from pillar to post whenever it suits them.

[Joanna Grey 0]

nevermind wrote the following post at 17/09/2014 2:28 PM:

"Tomorrow is Scottish Independence day!"

Oh well, at least your consistent(ly wrong).

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

Turnout in Glasgow could have been better and the taste of oil oligarchies in Aberdeen were palpable.The threats and scare tactics from the establishment, companies and HMtQ won the day.Many people have been campaigning for a yes vote for over two years, some for all their lives, and the blues is inevitable for some days. But we have had all the promises from the three parties and will see how they honour these.This has galvanised young voters and they will not understand that they can''t vote in a general election until they are 18, something to be tackled. This has also exposed England as the last bastion for reform and the devolution powers promised to Scotland can''t be denied english copunciols.But what''s in it for voters? surely the first step would be to allow us a choice of fair voting systems so the make up of our councils is fairly represented. I shudder to think that we give NCC more powers and/or money to waste as they have wasted before, without us having a fair say in this.

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

The first pictures of vote rigging, this a snapshot from Sky this morning.http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/YesinNo.jpg

[ricardo 7,385]

[quote user="ricardo"][quote user="nevermind"][quote user="Joanna Grey"]I think someone is worried that he may get deported.[/quote]

who would that be then JG? Are you not worried that Scotlands common border with England will let in more immigrants when they are Independent, the latest scare which is backfiring? An Independent Scotland can make its own decisions on immigration and they can choose whether they want educated employees, hurray ''enries, or subbing layabouts who can''t be bothered to educate themselves, they are free of English guidance on that matter.

[/quote]If the Scots want to go then it''s entirely up to them but at least they are being asked to make a decision on what they want. This is something we are unlikely to get over Europe.Having said that I confidently predict that Scots will vote No by about 55% to 45%. Unfortunately this sort of result is going to leave a legacy of bitterness in Scotland and no doubt the blame will fall upon the English.[/quote]My forecast from 3 months ago.So Ricky got it spot on once again.I suppose you will think I''m part of the MI5 rigging brigade now.[;)]

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

[quote user="ricardo"][quote user="ricardo"][quote user="nevermind"][quote user="Joanna Grey"]I think someone is worried that he may get deported.[/quote]

who would that be then JG? Are you not worried that Scotlands common border with England will let in more immigrants when they are Independent, the latest scare which is backfiring? An Independent Scotland can make its own decisions on immigration and they can choose whether they want educated employees, hurray ''enries, or subbing layabouts who can''t be bothered to educate themselves, they are free of English guidance on that matter.

[/quote]If the Scots want to go then it''s entirely up to them but at least they are being asked to make a decision on what they want. This is something we are unlikely to get over Europe.Having said that I confidently predict that Scots will vote No by about 55% to 45%. Unfortunately this sort of result is going to leave a legacy of bitterness in Scotland and no doubt the blame will fall upon the English.[/quote]My forecast from 3 months ago.So Ricky got it spot on once again.I suppose you will think I''m part of the MI5 rigging brigade now.[;)][/quote]

Do you want a medal? Maybe a recount should suffice were diligent staff have been employed to do their own kind of count, dirty tricks all round, banana republic, . you will find some very unsavoury practises here.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbJif7vISQg&app=desktophttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbJif7vISQg&app=desktop

[ricardo 7,385]

[quote user="nevermind"][quote user="ricardo"][quote user="ricardo"][quote user="nevermind"][quote user="Joanna Grey"]I think someone is worried that he may get deported.[/quote]

who would that be then JG? Are you not worried that Scotlands common border with England will let in more immigrants when they are Independent, the latest scare which is backfiring? An Independent Scotland can make its own decisions on immigration and they can choose whether they want educated employees, hurray ''enries, or subbing layabouts who can''t be bothered to educate themselves, they are free of English guidance on that matter.

[/quote]If the Scots want to go then it''s entirely up to them but at least they are being asked to make a decision on what they want. This is something we are unlikely to get over Europe.Having said that I confidently predict that Scots will vote No by about 55% to 45%. Unfortunately this sort of result is going to leave a legacy of bitterness in Scotland and no doubt the blame will fall upon the English.[/quote]My forecast from 3 months ago.So Ricky got it spot on once again.I suppose you will think I''m part of the MI5 rigging brigade now.[;)][/quote]

Do you want a medal? Maybe a recount should suffice were diligent staff have been employed to do their own kind of count, dirty tricks all round, banana republic, . you will find some very unsavoury practises here.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbJif7vISQg&app=desktophttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbJif7vISQg&app=desktop[/quote]I don''t need a medal, just the knowledge that I was a damn site more prescient than you with your laughable conspiracy theories and that will do me fine thank you.However it would be nice if they were true because at least we would know that our spooks were engaged in something worthwhile rather than sitting around at GCHQ downloading internet porn.It''s evident that the sour grapes have left a bad taste in your mouth. Salmond has gone, Cameron is triumphant and Milliband is in a real bind if he opposes English votes for English laws. In trying to gain a political advange with devolution, Labour seem to have fekked themselves in the ar$e.

[JB 0]

I see that some of the `yes` mob are saying we need a new referendum because of possible vote rigging. What about all the dodgy Asian postal votes? Perhaps we should have multiple elections, best out of five? :)

[nevermind, neoliberalism has had it 159]

[quote user="JB"]I see that some of the `yes` mob are saying we need a new referendum because of possible vote rigging. What about all the dodgy Asian postal votes? Perhaps we should have multiple elections, best out of five? :)[/quote]Thanks for your niceties Ricardo, your oafish belief in the righteousness of the postal vote rigging just makes you a part of it.@JB, The Scots can have as many referendums as they like, most definitely after we had ours on Europe, the next could be for an Independent republic. And it was the Unionists who send their employess threatening letters, its was one of them who ripped a saltire from a young girl, hooligan thugs and a NO voting Scottish defence league, what a laugh,  attacked Yes voters in George square, Glasgow.This from an English ex Labour voter who was pestered by a letter from Milliband. "I am a YES voter, an Englishman living in Glasgow. For some

inexplicable reason I am on a mailing list which mean I received a spam

message from Ed Milliband yesterday, inviting me to join the Labour

party.

I did my best to be polite and civil in my reply, and I almost succeeded.

“Dear Mr Milliband,

Many thanks for your email invitation to join the Labour party today,

but I am afraid you have caught me at a very bad time. The truth is I’ll

probably vote Green in future. Suffice to say you won’t find me voting

Labour ever again.

May I just take this opportunity to ask you and your members to fuck right off you lying traitorous scumbags.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely"

[hexem 0]

After the vitriol nevermind, in the charming note to the leader of Her Majesties Opposition, what on earth do the 3 asterisks signify?It was not your letter I appreciate, which would be  even less understandable...Bri, bra,bru. ?...Mystified by aliens am I.NM

[Joanna Grey 0]

I suspect that nevermind is the creation of some type of comedian. Far funnier than ABS by a long chalk.