Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
king of latvia

ashton

Recommended Posts

how many of you on here asked the board to ashton when really that money should of been soent on a midfielder and a defender.

and thats what most of you are asking for know.it seems that the worthy and the board what ever they do cant do right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rubbish, Ashton is a magnificent signing (and credit to Worthy for that) - probably our best for years.

We still have the money for a midfielder or two, remember we bid £2m for Morrison so we aren''t exactly short of cash no matter what lines are peddled to us by the board.

Mark .Y.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We got Ashton because we couldn''t score last season. Now we need a creative midfielder, as Ashton will score given the service

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

King - if we didn''t have Ashton we would have Thorne, McKenzie (inj.), McVeigh and Henderson, yes I would definitely be moaning about that because the only proven goal scorer hasn''t even made the starting 11 yet has he?

The fact is Worthy shipped out 10 players and only brought in 6, that is the problem.    Of those 10, 5 of them played in Midfield for us last season and of the 6 only 3 are midfielders, which presents another problem.

Yes if he had bought a great midfielder instead of Ashton the midfield would be better, but it would still be 2 less than last season and that would leave our striker force pretty thin too.   Don''t forget we already had the smallest squad in the Prem and now its even smaller.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...