Big Vince 318 Posted December 5, 2017 1. Sack the Board2. Re-appoint Mr Chase as Life Executive Chairman3. Sack Webber4. Sack Farke5. Sack Ferrari6. Appoint PulisProblem solved. No League 1 worries. Bob''s your uncle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,219 Posted December 5, 2017 Seems like a plan.How do we go about number 1? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Feedthewolf 4,844 Posted December 5, 2017 [quote user="Big Vince"]1. Sack the Board2. Re-appoint the boy Chase as Life Executive Chairman3. Sack the boy Webber4. Sack the boy Farke5. Sack the boy Ferrari6. Appoint the boy PulisProblem solved. No League 1 worries. Bob''s your uncle.[/quote]Corrections in red. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JF 694 Posted December 5, 2017 Isn’t it strange how people forget the past? There was venomous protests against Robert Chase and he literally was hated by the majority of fans at the time. Now we want him back????? No thanks! As for the current owners, for me they have outstayed their welcome too. Let’s have someone fresh though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PurpleCanary 5,554 Posted December 5, 2017 It is strange. One of the main accusations from the Private Frazer Brigade against Smith and Jones is that they have presided over unnecessary relegations, and supposedly always just at the wrong time, when more money was coming into the Premier League, and we could this time really, really have established ourselves...They never cite the most blatant example, of 1994-95, just two seasons after finishing third, when the chairman gambled halfway through the campaign that the team was already safe and so he didn''t need to spend a bit of money on an decent goalie to replace the injured Gunn. And, yes, this was just when the money was starting to come into the Premier League, and we had enjoyed nine consecutive seasons in the top flight. And, not least because of the financial mess the chairman had left, we would not get back for a decade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rogue Baboon 0 Posted December 5, 2017 Can’t even believe I am even botherig to reply...1. Is it even possible to sack the board? Who’s responsiblity would it be?2. If it was possible, what exactly would happen? We would still have no money, Delia would still be majority shareholder, we just wouldn’t have a board of directors? What would the point of that be? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thisisbabyish 0 Posted December 6, 2017 Chase would never come back, end of story! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mello Yello 2,280 Posted December 6, 2017 Not a big fan of Bob Chase and I was present at the protests outside the ground......Wonder if those ''veteran fans'' that defend & support the current owners and board, also protested for Bob''s removal?......Anyway, I can''t see us ever playing the likes of Inter or Bayern in a competitive competition again - or reaching Cup semi-finals, or that we''ll finish in the top 6 of the Premiership in the foreseeable future......?But, it''s all history and now long gone......(Oh, and I wouldn''t have Bob back either)......Keep pullin'' ''em in Vince......and throw them sprats back in...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted December 6, 2017 Half a league, half a league, Half a league onward, All in the valley of Death Rode the disgruntled. "Forward, the Lightweight Brigade! I''m right behind you" Vince said; Into the valley of Death Rode the disgruntled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mello Yello 2,280 Posted December 6, 2017 Ah, another sprat that needs chuckin'' back...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Vince 318 Posted December 6, 2017 Three points spring to mind:1. As I recall, the main problem in 94-95 was that we stopped scoring goals and teams that do that go down. So the goalie was not the main issue for me.2. I would never go as far as to give the Suffolk Socialists ten years grace because of the "financial mess" left by Chase. Their own incompetence over the whole 21 years of their tenure demonstrates that they are ill-deserving of any such a period of grace.3. The Suffolk Socialists have their own little "financial mess" on their CV - the £21 million debt that had built up by 2009 and which took the interventions of Bowkett and McNasty and Lambert to clear up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PurpleCanary 5,554 Posted December 6, 2017 [quote user="Big Vince"]Three points spring to mind:1. As I recall, the main problem in 94-95 was that we stopped scoring goals and teams that do that go down. So the goalie was not the main issue for me.2. I would never go as far as to give the Suffolk Socialists ten years grace because of the "financial mess" left by Chase. Their own incompetence over the whole 21 years of their tenure demonstrates that they are ill-deserving of any such a period of grace.3. The Suffolk Socialists have their own little "financial mess" on their CV - the £21 million debt that had built up by 2009 and which took the interventions of Bowkett and McNasty and Lambert to clear up.[/quote]You recall entirely wrong, of course. Gunn got injured in the 21st game, so exactly halfway through the season. In that first half we scored 19 and conceded 18. In the second half we scored 18 (that is only one less, in case your maths is not up to it) and conceded 36, which is exactly double. So we didn''t stop scoring. We just started letting in hatfuls of goals. We accumulated 30 points with Gunn and 13 without. And Chase sat on his hands, or rather on his money, gambling we would be safe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Vince 318 Posted December 6, 2017 We still had a problem scoring as 37 goals in the season is less than one per game.And on what basis are the goals conceded entirely due to the goalkeeper? Norwich City have always been good at letting in goals so to ascribe this relegation to one player is very far-fetched. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FenwayFrank 2,456 Posted December 6, 2017 Is Chase still alive ? He must be getting on a bit by now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,722 Posted December 6, 2017 [quote user="Big Vince"] The Suffolk Socialists have their own little "financial mess" on their CV - the £21 million debt that had built up by 2009 and which took the interventions of Bowkett and McNasty and Lambert to clear up.[/quote]A sizeable chunk of that £21 million relates to be unavoidable rebuild of The South Stand as Chase had allowed it to fall into disrepair to such an extent The Licensing Authority were not going to renew its safety certificate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greavsy 2,412 Posted December 6, 2017 FenwayFrank wrote the following post at 06/12/2017 4:58 PM:Is Chase still alive ? He must be getting on a bit by now A quick Google search would suggest he is 78. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,219 Posted December 6, 2017 Thanks Greavsie. I wonder if he ever attends a game? There was nobody with more ambition than HIM at Carrow Road, it’s be a shame to think he’d missed out on our recent top flight flirtations and Wembley. He’d have loved a Wembley win on his CV. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
......and Smith must score. 1,334 Posted December 6, 2017 [quote user="FenwayFrank"]Is Chase still alive ? He must be getting on a bit by now[/quote]I''m sure if he had snuffed it there''d be a column inch or two on here so he must be alive and kicking. I reckon he can''t be far off 80 now.Not '' Big Bob '' now though. Saw him outside the Theatre Royal a while back and he''s more like size zero now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,219 Posted December 6, 2017 Hope you booed him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
......and Smith must score. 1,334 Posted December 6, 2017 [quote user="Duncan Edwards"]Thanks Greavsie. I wonder if he ever attends a game? There was nobody with more ambition than HIM at Carrow Road, it’s be a shame to think he’d missed out on our recent top flight flirtations and Wembley. He’d have loved a Wembley win on his CV.[/quote]So he''s 78 then. For all that went on back in the day you''d think he''d be a bit older perhaps ?He might have slipped into Carrow Rd in disguise over the last 20-odd years but the only games where there''s been definite sightings was at Selhurst Park back in the day when he was snuggling up to his old mate Ron Noades. He won''t have done that lately as Ron died a few years ago.Can''t imagine he wasn''t at Wembley for the Play-Off Final though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
......and Smith must score. 1,334 Posted December 6, 2017 [quote user="Duncan Edwards"]Hope you booed him[/quote]Sadly no as I didn''t recognise him at first as I drove past.By which time it was too late to run him over....[;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greavsy 2,412 Posted December 6, 2017 There was also a report on the EDP in 2010 saying his property, Halvervgate hall, was up for sale, although he wasn''t leaving the area, but looking to spend more time visiting family (one son in Oz).It was that article that quoted his age as 71. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,509 Posted December 6, 2017 He''s 79 and all fur coat with no knickers. Allegedly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Vince 318 Posted December 7, 2017 That is simply not accurate. The condition of the South Stand could not be pinned on Chase. It was an old stand that was always going to get done last on the list of priorities. The new stand was built some 8 years after he left and he would have got round to that too had he not been hounded out. As it was, Chase built the City Stand, the two corner infills, Barclay Stand, bought the old car park land and land behind the South Stand (which proved he had it in mind finish the work on the stadium.) He also bought the land at Colney and built the training facility there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
City 2nd 191 Posted December 7, 2017 Big Vince wrote the following post at 2017-12-06 7:13 PM:Three points spring to mind: 1. As I recall, the main problem in 94-95 was that we stopped scoring goals and teams that do that go down. So the goalie was not the main issue for me. Bit like the 17/18 Season is panning our then!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,722 Posted December 7, 2017 You claimed the debt stood at £21 million in 2009 and then babbled on about McNally and Bowkett sorting this debt out so as be be managable and i am saying a large chunk of that debt was unavoidable due to the rebuilt of The South Stand which cannot therefore be laid at Delia''s door. Chase had no plans to rebuilt it.Oh and The City Stand was paid for by Norwich Union as the result of the fire which took place before Chase took office so he only claim to fame is that it was rebuilt on his watch.To think you accuse me of not being accurate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
A Load of Squit 5,128 Posted December 7, 2017 [quote user="TIL 1010"]You claimed the debt stood at £21 million in 2009 and then babbled on about McNally and Bowkett sorting this debt out so as be be managable and i am saying a large chunk of that debt was unavoidable due to the rebuilt of The South Stand which cannot therefore be laid at Delia''s door. Chase had no plans to rebuilt it.Oh and The City Stand was paid for by Norwich Union as the result of the fire which took place before Chase took office so he only claim to fame is that it was rebuilt on his watch.To think you accuse me of not being accurate.[/quote]The award of the contract to rebuild the stand caused a major rift in the board and eventually Bob taking control of the club. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,722 Posted December 7, 2017 The contract was awarded to R.G. Carters and the rift was brought about as Sir Arthur South the then chairman was married to Bob Carters widow Lady Mary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill 1,788 Posted December 7, 2017 [quote user="Big Vince"]That is simply not accurate. The condition of the South Stand could not be pinned on Chase. It was an old stand that was always going to get done last on the list of priorities. The new stand was built some 8 years after he left and he would have got round to that too had he not been hounded out. As it was, Chase built the City Stand, the two corner infills, Barclay Stand, bought the old car park land and land behind the South Stand (which proved he had it in mind finish the work on the stadium.) He also bought the land at Colney and built the training facility there.[/quote]I bet he had help Share this post Link to post Share on other sites