Indy_Bones 441 Posted August 29, 2017 As the thread title asks, at one point he seemed almost certain to be joining on loan, and since then we''ve heard little to nothing about it.Would much rather we brought him in than current names like Flint or Hanley if I''m honest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FenwayFrank 2,423 Posted August 29, 2017 Wherever he''s going, it can''t be here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Icecream Snow 761 Posted August 29, 2017 We chose not to pursue several Premiership loanees, including Jake Clarke-Salter because we couldn''t give the parent club guarantees that we''d play them.Harry Redknapp, in an interview with Football Focus, told a story that a 19 year old loanee (possibly Bielik) was going to cost him £12500 a week in wages, which would double if the player didn''t play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lessingham Canary 99 Posted August 29, 2017 He has injured hs shoulder and wll be out for a good while, hence we wont be going anywhere near him, apparently. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kick it off 1,927 Posted August 29, 2017 He was set to sign but was away with the U21s - he gave an interview to the Polish press saying he would almost definitely sign on loan. Presumably Arsenal wanted to keep him for pre-season as he played quite a lot for them I think, and then he dislocated his shoulder last week and is out for two months so it''s dead in the water. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites