Dean Coneys boots 1,400 Posted September 2, 2017 Mainly 50''s or 60''s now? Only a few 70''s left I reckon.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,750 Posted September 2, 2017 Oh no, how terrible. Life will be such a struggle with this information. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barclay seats 4849 the 3rd 0 Posted September 2, 2017 Maybe if you find this type of statistic interesting , you should get out more ? Maybe try a real game ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FenwayFrank 2,458 Posted September 2, 2017 I thought he was talking about the age of people that post on here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Van wink 2,994 Posted September 2, 2017 Or Waveney''s BMI Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,218 Posted September 2, 2017 Just thought I''d have a gander at current ratings of our new signings;Gunn 65 with potential of 79Hanley 73 potential 78Farnke 71 potential 76Zimmermann - Not in gameHusband 65 Potential 70Trybull - 66 potential 71Vrancic - 72 potential 72Reed - 69 potential 78Stiepermann - 69 potential 72Watkins 69 potential 70I don''t think they''ll be too different to that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,527 Posted September 2, 2017 What are the ratings of all the players who left?And out of interest what is Russ Martin''s rating? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mervmeister 18 Posted September 2, 2017 Nutty Nigel.....Russ Martin is rated 72, 72 potential.Ruddy 73 rated, 73 porential.Rudd 71 rated, 75 potential.Bennett 69 rated, 70 potentialBassong 72 rated, 72 potentialWhittaker 70 rated, 70 potentialMulumbu 73 rated, 73 potentialDorrans 74 rated, 74 potentialHowson 74 rated, 74 potentialMurphy 69 rated, 80 potentialLafferty 71 rated, 71 potentialYou could include Dijks.. 74 rated, 78 potentialSo other than Jacob, Fifa says that most departed players had reached their maximum ability and are only going to go down hill from there. Agreed. Maybe that 74 is a bit harsh on Howson though! 76 IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,527 Posted September 2, 2017 Thanks Merv. Again out of interest, is Martin''s rating for centre back or full back? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 7,599 Posted September 2, 2017 Fifa ratings are honestly never, ever interesting. And I say this as someone who plays Fifa. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,218 Posted September 2, 2017 Nutty - in Fifa''s and FM of the past, the rating would get affected by playing players out of position. Now I don''t believe it does.Therefore, on last years edition we can safely play Dorrans on the left with no repercussions Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,527 Posted September 2, 2017 Lol AJBut in what position was that rating of 72 achieved? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AJ 1,218 Posted September 2, 2017 Any I guess, it just means his overall rating as a footballer is 72 (out of 100 I assume) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mervmeister 18 Posted September 2, 2017 Well on sofifa (website that shows all Fifa ratings broken down) Green indicates primary position, orange secondary. He shows orange for centre back and orange for right back. So guessing they have him rated 72 based on not really being 100% natural at either position, but able to do a job at both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,527 Posted September 2, 2017 Something else I know little about. But unless I''m missing something by the FIFA ratings the OP was referring to we have probably improved our central defence whilst cutting costs? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted September 2, 2017 I help with the ratings via the back office system. they are all based on reactionary evidence so often are a bit slow to increase or decrease. jacob this season for example will be lucky to be low 70s whereas naismith will likely still be mid 70s based on being decent for Everton 2 years ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 9,657 Posted September 2, 2017 You do the ratings?No wonder theyre always so wrong! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted September 3, 2017 haha, probably! I get access to the Norwich city page and can make suggestions backed up with stats and videos where I think they need to change them. don''t go on loads but sometimes about when the game is released I''ll go on if they are way off on someone like when Redmond was like 70 rated after a great season for us when we got promoted. will be keeping tabs on what they give Josh. got a bit about him this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 9,657 Posted September 3, 2017 Ah OK, thats quite cool!Surely after Jacobs last season he will be more around the 73-75 mark? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted September 3, 2017 It always fascinates me the wages our players are on in Football Manager Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,737 Posted September 3, 2017 I think i will just stick to going for a drink after the game and discussing what i have just watched if it is all the same with you statistically minded chaps. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Greavsy 2,412 Posted September 3, 2017 That''s very traditional Tilly 👍👍 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites