Welcome back Snodgrass.......................

[Lessingham Canary 108]

http://readnorwich.com/2017/07/20/norwich-interested-in-re-signing-snodgrass/Wonder if any legs in this? not seen it anywhere else, but an experienced head that might be usefull for the younger players we are signing (reaches for tin hat) views, any one welcome the idea? Personally like Snoddy and would be happy to see him back in yellow and green.

[Hoola Han Solo 448]

I think most Norwich fans with their heads screwed on would take him back.

[BroadstairsR 2,273]

Him and Naismith in the same team would give any referee a nervous breakdown by half-time.

[Branston Pickle 4,150]

We''d be daft to say no, but surely Brighton or Newcastle are more likely - it''s a shame Rafa didn''t go for him instead of Jacob.

[lappinitup 629]

Please be true...............although I can see Lakey''s face right now...

[Indy_Bones 444]

Not interested.Selfish player who is too slow, would cost too much in wages and who frankly hasn''t pulled up any trees at either Hull or West Ham for that matter.Much happier with Watkins than I ever would be with Snoddy returning.

[king canary 8,758]

Would have him back but wages would be the issue.

[Tetteys Jig 851]

Would imagine he''d go to the prem but you never know...

doesn''t seem to add up that we would be chopping high earners only to then buy snoddy who would no doubt want a fair packet.

I''d love him back here tho, especially at this level.

[norfolkngood 1,174]

i honestly would not have him back ( tin hat on)

i do not see him as a team player

good player do not get me wrong but moans non stop is that good for morale ?

does not release the ball quick enough then moans he did not get the support from team mates

like i said good player but seems to try so hard i think he then goes over the thin line of trying to do it all himself

my opinion only of course

[Ginja 43]

Never going to happen, on one side he''s on some crazy money like 70k a week, he''ll get a move to PL club most likely. The other side is does he fit with the new club mentality and style of football, not so sure. We recently got rid of a load of overpaid 29+ year old players so I doubt we''ll see the club in any hurry to sign them again.

[CDMullins 498]

Its a no from me

[Fuzzar 1,861]

Aren''t we looking for a penalty taker? And a back up scapegoat, or is that covered?

[peateabee 0]

No thanks. Technically an decent player and I could see how his type might fit into how Farke''s team seems to be developing. However not a great team player and the team ethic is going to be important for us this year. Also at 29 now - if we spend decent money on him we won''t be getting it back and I can''t imagine he would be too cheap. (hasn''t he also been almost permanently injured since we sold him?!) Buying younger, hungrier players with potential to improve and command a greater transfer fee than we pay should be our mantra in all but the most exceptional circumstances.

[chaywa 0]

Isn''t that Naismith''s role?

[Yellow Wal 315]

Please, please NO.

[lharman7 39]

No thanks. This is a season of change and we should look to the future not the past.

[hogesar 10,766]

Obviously we can''t afford him but purely from a footballing point of view we would be daft not to take him. Would walk straight into any starting eleven in this league and improve it.

[GJP 79]

What Hog said.

[Lessingham Canary 108]

The rumour in Scotland is Rangers are keen on Naismith if they can find a way to structure payments, which might free up some space, plus would make an interesting captain?[6]

[lake district canary 4,830]

No. Just no.  [:''(]

[Captain Birdseye 0]

I assume following the same logic we would also want the wolf back as well

Innit

[Van wink 2,994]

Would have him back in a shot.

Ain''t going to happen though.

I can''t see much of our newfound wealth being invested in the player budget.

[Woodman 92]

[quote user="Fuzzar"]Aren''t we looking for a penalty taker? And a back up scapegoat, or is that covered?[/quote]

We have at least 4 at the club already (scapegoats, that is): Naismith, Martin, McGovern, Wildschut and if, for any reason, they all do well (or leave), there''s Jerome.

[Highland Canary 78]

What a top player Snoddy was for us - and he appeared to care - would be an excellent reacquisition.

[Yellow Wal 315]

Such a top player that Hull were happy to move him on and now, apparently, so are West Ham.

Would do much more harm than good. We should be looking forward, not backwards.

[Yellow Wal 315]

It will be interesting to see if Brighton are in the race (if there is one) to get him or whether Hughton has seen enough and decides that he doesn''t want him.

[lake district canary 4,830]

Says it all.http://www.football.london/west-ham-united-fc/players/west-ham-snodgrass-sturm-graz-13345792

[Indy 3,471]

It''s never going to happen, we''re reducing wages not increasing them.

Farke was quiet clear on the money from transfers not to be counted on and he knew the restrictions on our finances.

Like others, go forward not backwards, most returning players never really have the level of success.

[Mr Angry 2,019]

If we''re looking to play a game based on increased ball retention he would be ideal-he always took ages to pass to another player. 🙄

[GJP 79]

Think people will find Snodgrass was well liked on and off the pitch by the other lads when he was here.