Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Number 9

Inclusion

Recommended Posts

Virtually all the suggestions for the new manager / director of football have been white middle age English men.

What would the list look like if we had Rooney''s law, where ethnic minorities are to be part of the interview process.

Also, with the popularity of women''s football, how would you feel if a woman hot one of the jobs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Am I missing something? Why should somebody be considered for a job just because of his skin colour or his/her gender?

I would want the best man for the job.

Paul Ince isn''t in management. Not because of his skin colour, but because he''s a crap manager who threatened to knock a match official out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I''ve seen Hughton mentioned which isn''t going to happen, but other than that the list is rather predictable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We need to be looking at employing a lesbian from an ethinic minority (possibly an assylum seeker?). That would solve all of our problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Les"]Are you saying you want a hot woman appointed? ??[/quote]

Don''t you want a hot woman for the job?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rogue -

Am I missing something? Why should somebody be considered for a job just because of his skin colour or his/her gender?

Rooney''s law in the states says minority groups have to be interviewed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that, but not sure if I agree with he logic.

''Hello, welcome to the interview. By the way, we have 3 better candidates we have already interviewed but law states we have to interview you based on your skin colour''

I''m not sure it really helps the case it''s trying to put forward. You should be interviewed and appointed on merit, regardless of anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Rogue Baboon"]I understand that, but not sure if I agree with he logic.

''Hello, welcome to the interview. By the way, we have 3 better candidates we have already interviewed but law states we have to interview you based on your skin colour''

I''m not sure it really helps the case it''s trying to put forward. You should be interviewed and appointed on merit, regardless of anything else.[/quote]Agree with this. I''ve never been a fan of ''positive discrimination''.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I recall correctly, the feedback and experience from the process is seen as beneficial for the candidates moving forward.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Number9

If I recall correctly, the feedback and experience from the process is seen as beneficial for the candidates moving forward.

Cruel, so they can apply for other jobs they are not going to be considered for either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If people have the appropriate qualifications and skill set yet are constantly being knocked back because of race, then perhaps the system is wrong?

It''s something which is applicable to us because we have appointed relatively inexperienced managers in recent history. They must have had qualifications but not extensive experience, so the board may well do it again, especially if a DOF has oversight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
We have a hot woman at the helm don''t we?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...