Jump to content
Note to existing users - password reset is required Read more... ×
Sign in to follow this  
KeiranShikari_2

surgi cannoss

Recommended Posts

Im gunna call him Lurgy Canos, im sick of hearing about someone who isnt ours and never did anything for us.

shhhh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How many starts did he get here ? One to regret I think and Maddison must be loving it too at Norwich. Can''t blame any young lad who turned us down in the future as the potential for being given a run of games is zero .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Midlands Yellow"]How many starts did he get here ? One to regret I think and Maddison must be loving it too at Norwich. Can''t blame any young lad who turned us down in the future as the potential for being given a run of games is zero .[/quote]If "the potential for being given a run of games is zero" then why the **** are we buying them and paying their wages?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If only we had a fast pacy winger or two, then maybe I could understand the thought that Canos was ''surplus''.However after a 7-1 win any stick will have to do, I suppose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great shame I said at the time it was a big mistake this time next year he could be a 10m player don''t forget he is younger than the murphy twins. I do accept the latter have made good progress this season

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
I don''t think Canos was given enough​ of a chance to impress in the first team. But with the Murphys progressing nicely, it''s not such a big deal.  Glad it''s working out for him at his new club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don''t worry about the idiots on this board who will knock anything anyone says if they don''t agree.

We got rid of Morty but Morty Mark 23456789 will appear with their usual put down remarks

Mentioned Redmond when I saw his first or second game for us in Sacramento that he was a future 10 million pound value player to be ridiculed.

Only made the bench here but is regular in a top Premiership Club. If only NCFC was as forward thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="daly"]Don''t worry about the idiots on this board who will knock anything anyone says if they don''t agree.

We got rid of Morty but Morty Mark 23456789 will appear with their usual put down remarks

Mentioned Redmond when I saw his first or second game for us in Sacramento that he was a future 10 million pound value player to be ridiculed.

Only made the bench here but is regular in a top Premiership Club. If only NCFC was as forward thinking.[/quote]quite

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PS

Would have thought irrespective that we have both the brilliant Murphys that Canos would still have proven a good player to stick with

We kept Randy Lafferty, Sick Note Jarvis and Mulumbu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="daly"]PS

Would have thought irrespective that we have both the brilliant Murphys that Canos would still have proven a good player to stick with

We kept Randy Lafferty, Sick Note Jarvis and Mulumbu[/quote]Definition of forward thinking![;)]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Murphys didn''t just appear in out of thin air, they were here yet we still chose to bring in Canos.

Ones man''s ''stick to beat the club with'' is another legitimate questioning of our transfer record I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure Canos is better than those three or he would probably have played more wouldn''t he? Certainly in his limited appearances for us he looked some distance away from Jacob. Wildshut is a completely different type of winger offering power strength etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Nuff Said"][quote user="Midlands Yellow"]How many starts did he get here ? One to regret I think and Maddison must be loving it too at Norwich. Can''t blame any young lad who turned us down in the future as the potential for being given a run of games is zero .[/quote]If "the potential for being given a run of games is zero" then why the **** are we buying them and paying their wages?[/quote]

Is this what they mean when they tell us that the recruitment hasn''t been very good? You identify a potential player, you do your research on him (due diligence), you pay a load of dosh to get him here, you give him a healthy contract (I assume), then you apparently forget that you have him amnd get him to do nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Signed before we signed Pritchard. No doubt about who I''d rather have...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="KeiranShikari"]Keith Scott gets it.[/quote]gets what ?a programme every home game at poorman road ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jeez, how many more times will we see this thread?! I was dead pleased when we signed him as saw him a lot last season - it didn''t work out, he didn''t quite ''fit'' for some reason but that''s life, good luck to him. The simple fact is that he was playing poorly in the u23s so quite why we''d have played him in the first XI I''m not sure. Even at Brentford, where they love him, he is almost legendary for his lack of stamina and runs out of puff after an hour, is always subbed on about 70 mins. AN clearly saw the potential but quite reasonably wanted more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

steady on old fellowthere''s binners on this threadthey don''t want to read that sort of stuff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Branston Pickle"]Jeez, how many more times will we see this thread?! I was dead pleased when we signed him as saw him a lot last season - it didn''t work out, he didn''t quite ''fit'' for some reason but that''s life, good luck to him. The simple fact is that he was playing poorly in the u23s so quite why we''d have played him in the first XI I''m not sure. Even at Brentford, where they love him, he is almost legendary for his lack of stamina and runs out of puff after an hour, is always subbed on about 70 mins. AN clearly saw the potential but quite reasonably wanted more[/quote]

An example of our poor recruitment?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whereas Pritchard is an example of our good recruitment?

We buy a player with potential. Because other squad members perform better than we might have hoped, he finds himself at the bottom of the queue for his position and we let him go. You would prefer he had just turned out to be sh*t?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure what part of our defence he would have improved this season.

Going forward we are fine and Jacob came to prominence faster than expected. Canos left Liverpool to get regular games - that was not going to happen here with the options we had once Jacob emerged.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I''m not convinced either of the Murphy''s, Jarvis or Wildschut offer any more than Canos. He''s one player I''d have liked to have seen more of - especially when Jacob went off the boil when he got his new contract late 2016. Things move on though, and we''re hardly short in that position are we?

Far bigger priorities elsewhere...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×