peter2704 0 Posted January 25, 2017 It''s looking likely that Snodgrass is jumping ship this January for a fee rumoured to be around £10m. Just wondered if we had a sell-on clause when we sold him to Hull?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Woodman 92 Posted January 25, 2017 Moose is saying £10m fee has been accepted for him from Burnley. That''ll be them not interested in Brady then. Don''t know about the sell-on clause BTW. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr Greenthumb 746 Posted January 25, 2017 The rumour was 30percent, but don''t quote me on it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chip20 69 Posted January 25, 2017 [quote user="Dr Greenthumb"]The rumour was 30percent[/quote]Whoops; sorry (!) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr Greenthumb 746 Posted January 25, 2017 Haha see what you did there Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
king canary 7,577 Posted January 25, 2017 I''d assume it would only be a percentage of the profit- so 30% of about £3m if he goes for £10m. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesney Hawkes 0 Posted January 25, 2017 So if Snodgrass goes to Burnley for 10m and Hull use that .only to buy Brady for 9m, we only get 1m total?Club''s an absolute joke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shefcanary 2,383 Posted January 25, 2017 Unlike some on here, I think that is a good move by Hull, and a very bad move by Dyche / Burnley. Snoddy is now making up for lost time on the player personal transfer fee elements. Expect to see him move on again in the summer when the Clarets get relegated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
unique 434 Posted January 25, 2017 Burnley won''t get relegated.......Heaton''s ability alone will see to that.A good goalkeeper can take you a long way, and unfortunately, last season we didn''t have one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites