Pritchard

[Jimmy Bone - Superstar 2]

I bet he is cursing the M25 traffic now!

[JF 694]

As should we be. Decent player but not what we needed to be spending that sort of money on.

[Jimmy Bone - Superstar 2]

Agree JF, doesn''t make sense does it especially when you look at the gaping gaps in the squad.

I bet he wishes he was at Brighton now though and to be fair, they probably needed him more

[Buh 0]

Why aren''t we Brighton?

[Move Klose 303]

He''s a number 10 simple as that. We play him on the wing.

[GPs Beard 0]

The left wing .

[GJP 79]

Got a football brain and can make things happen.

[Indy 3,283]

Pritchard & Canos were bought without any connection with us, last minute buys, why we bought them both is a mystery!

Still think Pritchard is quality and with Wes losing a bit of form, should have been Pritchard in the no. 10 position with two deadiated wide players.

I''d be thinking of a diamond with two strikers next game.

Ruddy, Pinto, Martin, Klose, Olsson, Thompson, the Murphy twins, Pritchard, Lafferty & Oliviera to start against QPR.

Younger hungry and point to prove.

Murph

[Jimmy Bone - Superstar 2]

Canos seems to be even more of an enigma than Pritchard.

Wonder what the issue is with him and why he doesn''t feature.

We didn''t half waste our transfer budget didn''t we and are paying for it now.

[Fiery Zac 1,066]

Pritchard was a great piece of business, he''s a quality player and will have a bright future, hopefully with us.

Wessi''s replacement ready to slot straight in and in the meantime has shown his qualities even when shoved slightly wider.

[Number 9 0]

[quote user="Indy"]Pritchard & Canos were bought without any connection with us, last minute buys, why we bought them both is a mystery!

Still think Pritchard is quality and with Wes losing a bit of form, should have been Pritchard in the no. 10 position with two deadiated wide players.

I''d be thinking of a diamond with two strikers next game.

Ruddy, Pinto, Martin, Klose, Olsson, Thompson, the Murphy twins, Pritchard, Lafferty & Oliviera to start against QPR.

Younger hungry and point to prove.

Murph[/quote]

Younger hungrier defender called Martin?

[Indy 3,283]

Having seen Bennett, Martin alongside Klose is the best of a bad option, IMO, my reference to young hungry comes from the engine room the midfield.

[Rock The Boat 1,326]

[quote user="Indy"]Pritchard & Canos were bought without any connection with us, last minute buys, why we bought them both is a mystery!

Still think Pritchard is quality and with Wes losing a bit of form, should have been Pritchard in the no. 10 position with two deadiated wide players.

I''d be thinking of a diamond with two strikers next game.

Ruddy, Pinto, Martin, Klose, Olsson, Thompson, the Murphy twins, Pritchard, Lafferty & Oliviera to start against QPR.

Younger hungry and point to prove.

Murph[/quote]

our lineup will look like this after January.

[Yellowbeagle 0]

Pritchard is a good player, a lot comes down to the club lately only being able to sign players who have been made available for transfer hence we don''t actually sign players in the position we need as that would require us prizing players from teams who don''t want to sell.

Basically I think we signed him to hide the fact we weren''t getting either a real alternative to Jerome or a no nonsense centre back that we are crying out for as a team. If we''d have got those in aswell at Pritchard it would have been great business (especially if we could have offloaded Naismith).

[City 2nd 191]

Jimmy Bone - Superstar wrote the following post at 2016-11-06 6:42 PM:

Canos seems to be even more of an enigma than Pritchard.

Wonder what the issue is with him and why he doesn''t feature.

We didn''t half waste our transfer budget didn''t we and are paying for it now.

Not to mention Naismith?!!

[Jimmy Bone - Superstar 2]

I actually don''t think that Naismith has been given enough opportunity and I think at the moment he could do a job for us.

[FCC 76]

I thought Canos left Liverpool as they wouldn''t break their salary structure. So presumably we are able to pay him more to not be in the squad than Liverpool would.

Did anyone watch him play? The lad seemed really eager to impress, but has had virtually no opportunity.

Waste of our money and his time.

Surprised we didn''t pay £10 million for Flapper McGovern.