Jim Smith 2,290 Posted November 6, 2016 Please Archant can we not have articles in the paper off the back of it claiming Neil has the backing of our support. The swing to "give him as much time as he needs" in the last few hours is blatantly dodgy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Smith 2,290 Posted November 6, 2016 Sorry that should say by binners! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rogue Baboon 0 Posted November 6, 2016 Its just not a logical answer from a football or business sense to give.I can understand any other answer, from sacking now up to a limited time, but I do not believe you would find 1 supporter in the world that would say they would give their manager ''as long as he needs''What does that even mean? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesney Hawkes 0 Posted November 6, 2016 Or maybe you just don''t like the result so you are complaining about the process. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rogue Baboon 0 Posted November 6, 2016 So you believe more people are now in favor of ''giving him as long as he needs'' than before yesterdays game?Its illogical that any fan at any club would say that about their manager Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Time to go Delia 0 Posted November 6, 2016 As long as he likes hardly had a vote a couple of hours ago , just like people on here rush to vote on anything Ipswich related it looks like they are now paying us back in kind . What Norwich supporter in their right mind wants to keep Neil a minute longer . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jim Smith 2,290 Posted November 6, 2016 [quote user="King Crimson"]Or maybe you just don''t like the result so you are complaining about the process.[/quote]I''m not complaining about the process but the fact is online polls can be influenced by mischief makers. I am also 100% confident that the result (as it stands currently) does not reflect the views of the 26,000 fans in that ground yesterday and that support for giving him time has not increased on the back of that shambles.The problem is if archant run stories on the back of it saying Neil has a mandate it''s the type of thing our stubborn owners will seize upon to back their stance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesney Hawkes 0 Posted November 6, 2016 So we should ban democracy because it can come up with the wrong results? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Van wink 2,994 Posted November 6, 2016 "Democracy " lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
djc 0 Posted November 6, 2016 Perhaps we can launch an official challenge against the final outcome of the poll? #alexit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,352 Posted November 6, 2016 Online polls should surely be the domain of the keyboard kings. We know what we think and don''t need somene being paid as a journo to rehash it on the main site.What about doing a bit of old fashioned journalism and getting quotes from all the people Delia has supposedly turned away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jools 584 Posted November 6, 2016 Is Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas Scrutineer of this poll? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesney Hawkes 0 Posted November 6, 2016 All my accounts voted once each. I don''t really see the issue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,656 Posted November 6, 2016 [quote user="Jim Smith"]Please Archant can we not have articles in the paper off the back of it claiming Neil has the backing of our support. The swing to "give him as much time as he needs" in the last few hours is blatantly dodgy.[/quote]I noticed that as well at around 4pm the out now was in front by a country mile and a couple of hours later the swing had taken place. Now look what i found posted on TWTD at around 3 pm today.Weakness runs rampant through Carrow Rd it seems on 15:03 - Nov 6 with 1240 viewsPJHJust discovered that the ''Pink Un'' is running an online a survey for how long they should keep Neil. Longest option is end of the season but ''out now'' is leading. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt. Pants 4,092 Posted November 6, 2016 The only count that we need to be concerned about is the number of balls that end up in the back of the City net. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rogue Baboon 0 Posted November 6, 2016 I noticed that as well Til, but didn''t look at the date - presumed as they were talking about the Martin interview it was from last weekPretty much explains the sudden swing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy 3,232 Posted November 6, 2016 Utterly pointless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted November 6, 2016 I think we need another poll! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JF 694 Posted November 6, 2016 When I voted the poll was massively in favour of he should go now, so yeah I''d say this has reached an Ipswich forum and is being rigged Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted November 6, 2016 Good job archantGood job Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt. Pants 4,092 Posted November 6, 2016 The poll is mentioned on TWTD along with comments ''hope they keep Neil a bit longer''. Now they''ve had their bin stink fingers on it I think we can safely assume it''s been skewed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,352 Posted November 6, 2016 Seriously, an online poll!!!!No wonder the country''s going to the dogs..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Duncan Edwards 2,189 Posted November 6, 2016 [quote user="nutty nigel"]Seriously, an online poll!!!!No wonder the country''s going to the dogs.....[/quote]And being governed by one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,656 Posted November 6, 2016 [quote user="Duncan Edwards"][quote user="nutty nigel"]Seriously, an online poll!!!!No wonder the country''s going to the dogs.....[/quote]And being governed by one.[/quote]I think you will find Diane Abbott is the shadow Home Secretary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesney Hawkes 0 Posted November 6, 2016 No racism please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alan 0 Posted November 7, 2016 What racism? Sexism possibly and that started in the previous post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted November 7, 2016 Dianne Abbot though... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chesney Hawkes 0 Posted November 7, 2016 If you wanted to question Corbyn''s judgement, having her as his choice of partner in adultery would be a good start. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daly 497 Posted November 7, 2016 Need to get Donald Trump in now Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,656 Posted November 7, 2016 Unless i missed something it looks like that poll disappeared and no result was published. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites