ec-p 89 Posted September 1, 2016 He must be right royally peed off now, will AN actually give him a start if Jerome and Nelson aren''t fit? No matter what he has or hasn''t done off the field, he really has been treated woefully. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city4eva 202 Posted September 1, 2016 Compensated by the mega wages he picks up each week Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ec-p 89 Posted September 1, 2016 Why not just draw a line under it and let him be compensated by mega wages somewhere else. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted September 1, 2016 Anyone know why his move collapsed? Would we not let him leave, or was it wage demands again? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted September 1, 2016 No he couldn''t move because we couldn''t bring in a replacement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keith Scott 238 Posted September 1, 2016 Feel genuinely sorry for the bloke. He must rue the day he joined this shambles of a club. Another victim of Neil''s diabolical man management and the boards complete incapability to get deals done. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Wal 314 Posted September 1, 2016 Keith Scott wrote the following post at 01/09/2016 8:21 AM:Feel genuinely sorry for the bloke. He must rue the day he joined this shambles of a club. Another victim of Neil''s diabolical man management and the boards complete incapability to get deals done. -----------------------------------------------------------------------Or it could be that he isn''t very good and we should never have signed him in the first place. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Indy_Bones 441 Posted September 1, 2016 Initial signs seem to suggest that WE pulled the plug on his move away because we simply couldn''t sign anyone else, and despite there apparently being THREE clubs in for his signature!Absolutely pathetic because AN has made it abundantly clear that he does NOT want to play the guy, so even if his move would have left us with just CJ, Oli and Morris, would it have mattered anyway as we''re already screwed if CJ and Oli get injured! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ec-p 89 Posted September 1, 2016 Good enough to score in the cup and then sees Naismith start up front on his own, instead of him. Then not allowed to leave, for whatever reason. Cant be a happy bunny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted September 1, 2016 Or alternatively he might be hungry to do well and ram it down Neil''s throat? Depends on how he reacts, but must see it as an opportunity to prove himself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barking Mad Barclay Boy 13 Posted September 1, 2016 saw a tweet at 9.30pm saying the deal fell through as we couldnt get a replacement in. That saved me staying up all night! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ec-p 89 Posted September 1, 2016 He barely gets a chance to prove himself though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted September 1, 2016 He gets a chance to prove himself every training session, and with his general conduct.Let''s be honest, Alex Neil doesn''t strike me as a dick, so if he would rather start want-away Naismith ahead of Lafferty I would imagine there is a reason for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB 997 Posted September 1, 2016 You would have hoped he tried to do that when he came on for half an hour at Birmingham, the ratings he received suggests he was as pants as the rest of the team that day. I only ever played at a low level in local leagues, and occasionally I would be dropped, unfairly in my eyes, when I did get back in the team I busted a gut to make sure I was not dropped again, but then I was playing for the love of the game rather than for mega bucks and the love of the lifestyle....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites