a1canary 0 Posted October 24, 2005 I''d love to know where they stand on all this. Not heard a peep from them. It''s supposed to be a management ''team'' after all. Is it a united team? Surely between the three of them the should be able to get the players playing. I wonder how much input they really have into first team affairs. What exactly is Dougie Livermore''s role? I don''t know what to think at the moment - i was for retaining the manager. And it''s so easy to jump on the bandwagon. It''s rolling over my toes at the moment though so don''t know what to think...! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Northern Canary 0 Posted October 25, 2005 TBH, it doesnt matter what they say, its a result on saturday that counts for me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
silver fox 0 Posted October 25, 2005 I might have my facts wrong but I believe when Worthy negotiated his new and improved contract the board also did the same for Livermore and Foley. If this is the case then you will not get any dissent in the ranks from either of them. I believe Foley is responsible for the majority of coaching now that he has thankfully recovered from his illness, Worthy also gets involved in coaching and picks the team, but I am at a loss to say what Livermore does. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
