CANARYKING 634 Posted February 13, 2016 Can''t see the point of bringing him on, lost the ball almost immediately, too weak in the tackle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capt. Pants 4,092 Posted February 13, 2016 Agreed. Brady is not a great left back and I would rather see him further forward, but Olsson really is quite hopeless. Shame we don''t have someone better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hairy Canary 628 Posted February 13, 2016 Just couldn''t see the point of that change. Another unnecessary change made to the defence. This time midway through the game and one which weakened us.For goodness sake AN leave the defence alone and when we go two up take off a winger (Redmond) and look to hold the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AmericanNorwichFan 0 Posted February 13, 2016 Olsson is looking a bit chubby as well. Bit like Hooper did. When he got the ball at one point, he looked behind him to see Andy Carroll, then proceeded to fall down the next time Big Andy touched him and the ref didn''t give him the foul. They whipped the ball in and Bassong nearly scored an own goal trying to clear it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Making Plans 929 Posted February 13, 2016 He needs to man up & ditch the gloves Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
daly 497 Posted February 13, 2016 It''s get quite chilly down by the Jarrold Stand Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pliff 4 Posted February 13, 2016 Just like our RB then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted February 13, 2016 AN as wearing a fetching pair of gloves today, he needs to man up a bit too, pansy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJP 79 Posted February 13, 2016 Well the change happened because Naismith was knackered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,657 Posted February 13, 2016 Have i just hit upon this weeks scapegoat thread ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fiery Zac 1,065 Posted February 13, 2016 The change made perfect sense. Naismith had had it and needed to come off. We needed some pace to replace him to use on the counter and sit a little deeper to keep hold of what we had. The change was in the offing before their first which would''ve been a better time, and after that the whole team panicked their way so deep that Noble couldn''t miss. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grim reaper 0 Posted February 13, 2016 Agree America Norwich fan, Olsson looking a bit chubby, must have been on some of Mulumbu''s and Vadis pies Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted February 14, 2016 Frustrating player really. He has all the attributes to be a good attacking full back, pace, stamina, good cross, strong but seems a bit slow of mind at times. I too would rather see Brady further forward ideally but we are trying to accommodate Wes, Redmond and Naismith and Olsson just looks dodgy as anything when he''s played this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,657 Posted February 14, 2016 [quote user="grim reaper"]Agree America Norwich fan, Olsson looking a bit chubby, must have been on some of Mulumbu''s and Vadis pies[/quote]They use the same pie shop as Waveney. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted February 14, 2016 I love the way, when somebody wants to have a go at one of our players, "looking a bit chubby" seems to pop up somewhere.😳 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AmericanNorwichFan 0 Posted February 14, 2016 [quote user="Mr Jenkins"]I love the way, when somebody wants to have a go at one of our players, "looking a bit chubby" seems to pop up somewhere.😳[/quote]I thought I''d sound more proper if I said "chubby". I can say it more American if you like, he looked fat. Very unathleticly fat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted February 14, 2016 "Very unathleticly fat."My word that is quite an accusation from an American.He''ll be wearing dear old Hartsons shorts next. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AmericanNorwichFan 0 Posted February 14, 2016 We are what we say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Making Plans 929 Posted February 14, 2016 Olsson is having a pretty terrible run at the moment & not playing anywhere near his best. Looks unfit, slow & awkward and his passing & crossing is poor.He has become a bit of a liability whether starting our coming on as sub. AN has no choice but to play Brady there because we do not have any other alternatives.Maybe Olsson can sort himself out in Dubai - wonder if he''ll take his gloves with him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
realale88 0 Posted February 14, 2016 I like Olsson.Hes the best LB we have and has a bit of bottle about him imo.I would play him and Brady left mid Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pliff 4 Posted February 14, 2016 [quote user="realale88"]I like Olsson.Hes the best LB we have and has a bit of bottle about him imo.I would play him and Brady left mid[/quote]Hurrah someone who has an eye for a good player imo Olsson is our best left back and gives 100% unlike some on the RB side that''s all Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Donkey dangler 0 Posted February 14, 2016 Its a pity Olsson is not physically stronger and about six inches taller. He gets out muscled in games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Paul101 91 Posted February 14, 2016 how on earth can you say the RB''s don''t give 100% they may all be limited but hell they all try Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hank shoots Skyler 2,094 Posted February 14, 2016 Olsson was the only player to save any face during our home game against Spurs and was rightly named MOTM. Was surprised to see him dropped in the Villa game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Creative Midfielder 1,976 Posted February 15, 2016 Completely agree, Olsson is our best left back by a country mile and if he isn''t good enough then we should have bought another in the window.Brady has been great going forwards but he very obviously isn''t a left back and it completely baffles me why AN continues to play him there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites