Lee Griffiths

[canarycop 232]

Sky reporting we are after him to replace a Celtic bound Hooper. Please God No!

This would be a desperate move after all the strikers we have been linked with.

Not good enough for Norwich

[Herman 11,136]

Have Sky been reading this forum?

[CanaryOne 0]

Mirror reporting it too .

[York Canary 29]

Lol. Well he''s more ''mobile'' than Hooper and may suit us better. Could just as easily go for someone like Gray though. I thought we wanted a tallish, athletic, pacey sort of striker like Jerome, but who knows.

I guess Griffiths would be like a little wasp and could be quite useful up front, even in the lone role. Certainly scored goals at whatever levels he''s played at.

[King Klose 0]

Leigh.

[Dr Greenthumb 792]

If we are replacing Hooper in a swap, we are still going to have either the no.9 or no.10 shirt vacant

[Katie Borkins 1]

Bor Bor Bor speaks, and the world listens.

[Katie Borkins 1]

He and Lafferty could have an illegitimate child-siring contest.

[Cantiaci Canary 610]

If this is true it certainly feels like our list of targets has been entirely exhausted, to no avail, and we are throwing random fish hooks out now.

[Yorkshire Canary 118]

much sooner we kept Hooper. This would be a step backwards rather than forwards

[Fuzzar 1,861]

He looks like the lovechild of Peter Beardsley and Ann Widdecombe. I don''t think I could bear to look at him, regardless of his ability as a footballer.

[jaemae2 0]

[quote user="Yorkshire Canary"]much sooner we kept Hooper. This would be a step backwards rather than forwards[/quote]

Getting rid of Hooper is addition through subtraction, it''s as simple as that. No way is getting rid of garbage like Hooper a "step back"

[Yorkshire Canary 118]

Give hooper game time and he will score goals. He got 8 in our relegation season and only played about half the games. he got double figures last season and also only played half the games. He can come on and score a goal at any level though i accept Jerome at the moment is the logical first choice. Griffiths has only scored in Scotland and league 1 so his potential has to be with that caviat

[canarycop 232]

Leigh or Lee. It''s doesn''t really matter. Not good enough for the Premier League. I will be seriously disillusioned if this happens. Destroy,Mbokani,Adobe then .......... Griffiths. C''mon really !!!!!

[Move Klose 303]

To be fair sky are reporting that the mirror says we are in for leigh Griffiths.

A bit different than sky and the mirror reporting it.

[jaemae2 0]

[quote user="Yorkshire Canary"]Give hooper game time and he will score goals. He got 8 in our relegation season and only played about half the games. he got double figures last season and also only played half the games. He can come on and score a goal at any level though i accept Jerome at the moment is the logical first choice. Griffiths has only scored in Scotland and league 1 so his potential has to be with that caviat[/quote]

He DID NOT SCORE 8 PL GOALS the year we got relegated, jesus christ. HE SCORED 6 (2 of which were PKS and 1 was a deflection from 35 yards out that was only a goal due to the deflection). HE STARTED 24 GAMES 9 MORE THAN ANY OTHER STRIKER. This idiocy is amazing.

[Branston Pickle 4,149]

I''m inclined to go with whatever AN reckons: if he doesn''t rate Hooper and thinks Griffiths is a better bet that''s good enough for me - I imagine he knows Griffiths''s game pretty well having been up there.

[Newton 0]

If this is who we have saved the No 9 shirt for its must be a sick joke

Has he ever played in England above L1

We must be desperate

[madjock 0]

where do these rumours come from Celtic are not interested in hooper ..Ronnie Delia the manager has never heard of Gary hooper. and griffiths is only 25 and far superior.

[Move Klose 303]

Far superior. Of course 😂😂😂😂😂😂