Katie Borkins 1 Posted August 30, 2015 Scores a goal in midweek and then left sitting on the bench while Hooper gets brought on and misses a sitter.Poor man management of our 8.5m pound man. If he had scored it could have been the start of something.I can only hope it was Hooper''s farewell kick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hackedoff 0 Posted August 30, 2015 I suppose running around chasing long balls would have given him heaps of self belief Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Van wink 2,994 Posted August 30, 2015 Having seen Hooper miss his chance to score Ricky might not be feeling so bad as you think. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hairy Canary 628 Posted August 30, 2015 Bless him and his fragile confidence.IF he had scored the sitter the Hooper missed you say? Mighty big if in my opinion. Why was he more likely to score it than Hooper? Also what about Hoopers confidence being demoted below a guy who has scored two goals in dozens of games? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nuff Said 4,936 Posted August 30, 2015 Can we work something into this thread which will involve you drinking another pint of your own urine Bor? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katie Borkins 1 Posted August 30, 2015 Just say the word. It''s on tap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AmericanNorwichFan 0 Posted August 30, 2015 Shaken or stirred? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barclay seats 4849 the 3rd 0 Posted August 30, 2015 How did he feel while he watched Jerome miss two sitters ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted August 30, 2015 He thought "I remember when I did that...ahh" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 261 Posted August 30, 2015 Hooper has always been ahead of RvW for Neil so no surprise that was the change; It says it all for the last minute chance which fell to the clubs best finisher which didnt trouble the keeper.The sooner both move on the better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sonyc 5,446 Posted August 30, 2015 It was a chance that should have least been on target. But then so should have Jeromes header Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lappinitup 629 Posted August 30, 2015 I blame Snodgrass...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,351 Posted August 30, 2015 If he''s that fragile Cameron McGeehan''s comments on Canary Call will have knocked him for six... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanTheMan 2 Posted August 30, 2015 I would have sent RVW on because he puts in a shift and would have upped the energy level on the pitch. If he had got a chance and scored = bloody great for the lad, if he had missed = the game was gone anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,655 Posted August 30, 2015 Good work Bor you''ve sucked a few in with this one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanaryOne 0 Posted August 30, 2015 Wolfswinkle and Hooper could have started they couldnt have looked any worse than Jerome who is massively overated by City fans , he looked old ,slow and his attempt to nod in the sitter was just hilarious . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites