Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Stowcanary

8m bid for Gayle

Recommended Posts


[quote user="Tim Dawson"]I would rather Gayle than Grabban Ricardo surely ??[/quote]I''d rather keep the 8 million and take 5 for Grabban.Win Win.As it is it looks like we are stuck with both.Gayle not good enough for Palacenot good enough for us

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IMO he''s a decent player - I know several Palace fans and they rate him but reckon he doesn''t suit their system. I can''t understand why people on here don''t like him, unless it is just the usual ''he''s rubbish'' stuff that we always get - and got when we signed Holt and Jerome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Expensive but thats the market this year. Gayle is a decent option for our squad. Quick and can score goals. Rather have him than grabban anyday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think some of you just have "he''s rubbish" in your paste buffer and just ctrl+v regardless

We could sign an trans-dimensional alien with 26 pairs of legs and you''d say he was awful.

Not 2 games to rub together between any of you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He would add something different to what we already have. I would back him to find the net more frequently than Grabban.

Probably paying £1m or so over the top, but then at this late hour we''re gradually being backed into a corner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="norfolkngood"]tony cascarino was on sky sports panel earlier said he is worth 3 to 4 million ![/quote]Cascarino is spot on.Palace will be laughing their balls off if its anywhere near £8 million.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
£5m upwards for Grabban and £8m for Gayle is good business. He''s a lot better than many on here give him credit for. Would be happy with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BREAKING NEWS 1700 SSN

Sky sources understand Norwich have offered Crystal Palace forward Dwight Gayle a four-year deal at the club.

The clubs are currently discussing a fee for the 24-year-old. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="OnTheBall"]No thanks. Would rather have kept RVW. And that''s not a good thing.[/quote]

That''s the most ridiculous post ever. RVW is terrible. Gayle has played in the prem and has scored goals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="Branston Pickle"]Cascarino is a font of all knowledge, is he? Gayle is a far better player than Murray, who went for £4-5m so where does that leave you?[/quote]£4 million lighter in the wallet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its a downgrade on Hooper , Gayle is no Premier League player Palace just want to recoup the ludicrous fee they paid Peterborough for him . Wouldnt want him on a free but £8 million lol  the people running City really are clueless .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Genuine pacey striker who doesn''t have a bad record in the Prem all things considered.
A step above Grabban, Hooper, Rvw, Lafferty so a worthwhile signing. £8 million probably about right in the current window.
Also, just because palace are getting rid doesn''t mean he''s no good for us. Don''t think we''re in the same mini-league as them this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...