Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
stoke canary

Adam Johnson

Recommended Posts

Just cringing at my grammar mistakes, it''s 2015, where the f@ck is the edit button!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Sorry officer my speedo says I''m only doinng 30" officer says A "it''s ok ive never heard that one before on your way son" or B "tough sh1t it''s your job to ensure it is working"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With what''s on the news today and with Rotherham I find it truly shocking that people could even talk about "mitigating" circumstances. I wonder had their daughter been "shared" round a group of older men or even their son''s would they be so accommodating to these same mitigating circumstances?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Any male who has sex with a girl under 16 has broken the law and if they are charged I would expect them to be found guilty. The circumstances which lead to them having sex are only relevant in determining the sentence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Maccys Back"]An escort for a dog? Wow nice to know where my tax money goes, I must remember that enlightening story next time the police are moaning about the force being cut in half under this tory government[/quote][:D]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 pages of earnest discussion about the law and no one has thought of looking at what the law actually says?

The sexual offences Act 2003 is really quite sensible. Take a look at it and the associated CPS guidance and you''ll probably all agree with it and each other.

Which would make a change....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="lake district canary"][quote user="Maccys Back"]Changing?? No its fine as it is dumbass, is she 16? No then off to jail you go! Its as simple as it gets. You can''t go drink driving and say "well I wasn''t speeding" can you. I can''t believe how difficult some find this law.[/quote]

Mitigating circumstances can be real and meaningful in all sorts of situations. Drink driving and speeding are two of them. I got stopped last year on the way to the vets with my dog who had cut her paw and I was hurrying, not drastically, but over the speed limit. Far from getting a ticket, I got a police escort to the vets.

[/quote]
That''s sorted then, I''m taking an injured dog with me the next time I go out nightclubbing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But if a chap, like Lakey''s dog, could lick it''s own balls then there would be no need to go to a nightclub to meet complicit women below the age of consent.

So Indy. You expect club doormen to extract evidence of a patron''s age but not the person who subsequently engages in intercourse with them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The person who subsequently engages in intercourse with them is a victim of the parents and doorman''s wrong doing. I think that''s how it works anyway....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I shagged an underage bird then I would blame the booze, the bouncers what let her in, the Bird for dolling herself up all fancy like, putting on slap and that to entice me, and her parents for not raising her right.

Never mind jail, i''d f**king well sue the lot of them for making me an accidental paedo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wouldn''t count on it Barbe bleu, seem to be quite a lot of misogynistic points of view on this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are STFU but people with those views are only stating them. And then we''re discussing them. I know what my views are but I''m quite happy for others to put theirs forward. What''s your problem with it?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="Mr Angry"]Any male who has sex with a girl under 16 has broken the law and if they are charged I would expect them to be found guilty. The circumstances which lead to them having sex are only relevant in determining the sentence.[/quote]

At last Mr Angry I agree with someone, and that punishment could be a slap on the wris to a lengthy prison sentance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Mr Angry"]Any male who has sex with a girl under 16 has broken the law and if they are charged I would expect them to be found guilty. The circumstances which lead to them having sex are only relevant in determining the sentence.[/quote]

At last Mr Angry I agree with someone, and that punishment could be a slap on the wris to a lengthy prison sentance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...