Jump to content

Wiz

Members
  • Content Count

    883
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Wiz


  1. [quote user="hogesar"]Some idiot''s think they can take advantage of the fact, as far as they''re concerned, a player won''t react or retaliate because they''re representing the club 24/7.
    I''m glad Ruddy done it. These kind of people with absolutely no spine who walk around abusing people they think they can get away with, deserve it.
    [/quote]

    Oh clever!

    He could be facing manslaughter charges if something had gone wrong.........he''s nowt but a thug.

  2. [quote user="toftwood"]Our timid Board will be budgeting for relegation... .again. Hence no increase in season ticket prices ........ cynical that.

    Prudence with zero ambition. ..come on down

    Wiz: Why oh why can''t you just fuck off![/quote]

    What and leave you in La La Land toftwood?

    If you can''t handle the truth swearing at the messenger won''t make it go away.


  3. [quote user="morty"][quote user="nutty nigel"]Some shareholders either don''t like Stephen Fry or don''t see the point of Stephen Fry being on our board. The latter I can fully understand because every year when the board face the shareholders Fry isn''t there. So naturally these shareholders ask "what is the point of Fry being on the board". The board answer that there is a point and the club benefit greatly from his presence. The board as a whole are successful and the club are in a good place on and off the pitch. So considering the answers fro the board the question I''m moved to ask is - what is the problem with Stephen Fry being on the board?[/quote]Maybe people would like a few more details perhaps?I couldn''t care less either way, but when I tell someone I''m a Norwich City fan, I have never had them say back "Oh isn''t that the club Stephen Fry is a director of?" In fact whenever I present anyone with this fact they look at me blankly.We already have a celebrity figurehead in Delia.I would be interested too to find out what Stephen Fry does for Norwich City.[/quote]

    Sweet sod all imo.

  4. [quote user="Prince of Darkness "]They have had a poor start to the season they are a progressive club and it was the right thing to do.

    Pity a club much closer to home wouldn''t also do like wise and reappoint a former manager[/quote]

    Huzzah!

    Meanwhile, our boards main concern are sausage rolls!

  5. [quote user="Tumbleweed"]The first thought I had, rightly or wrongly, was disagreement over managers. I have no idea whether Bowkett and McNally were as one over the Hughton fiasco, the Adams appointment and the risk over AN, but I had wondered whether after Watford attitudes were hardening somewhat. Remember what happened to Adams- a great club man, brief to bring back exciting football, initial promise then some strange decisions tactically and ultimately seen as a failure. Soem similarities perhaps with our current situation. I have no idea really, but I do agree with those who believe that something doesn''t quite add up, especially with the rather dry statement put out.[/quote]

    Something''s up that much is sure.

    Lets be harsh here, AN''s record as a PREMIER manager is quite poor.

  6. [quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="lappinitup"]AS there will be more than one new appointment, possibly a ''fan'' on the board?[/quote]I will see if City Angel can get a shortlist tomorrow night from the audience at the NCFSC forum. That should be the largest gathering of fans to gauge any interest in taking on the job.[/quote]

    Good God NO, just no!

    Remember the last elitist fan lark anyone?

  7. [quote user="JF"]lowlyfendweller If you decide to continue posting on this board you will soon realise that Nutty Nigel is one of those people that could start an argument in an empty phone box. He will try to twist anything to create an argument and is always right. He will always have to have the last word. he''s not worth replying to and unfortunately I''ve had a moment of weakness and indulged his bull 💩. A mistake I won''t be repeating again as he is best ignored.[/quote]

    Huzzah!

  8. [quote user="Keith Scott"]I''m starting to feel replacing the manager may be our best chance of survival. Alex Neil did fantastically to get us promoted but his shocking team selections are really costing us now. Bar a headed tap in v Swansea Howson has contributed nothing for weeks yet is immune to being dropped under Alex Neil. And if the manager genuinely believes Dorrans and Tettey are better than Mulumbu and Odjidja-Ofoe we should send for the white coats now. Today was the result and performance of a team destined for relegation.[/quote]

    Huzzah!

  9. [quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="Bor"]"Unless of course it is you posting it i suppose Bor ? [:|]"

    No idea what that means.

    I don''t have a problem with Stephen Fry and am glad he is devoting time from his busy schedule to raise some money for the club.

    If you want to beat the club''s ownership then sturdier sticks are available.[/quote]Stephen Fry is the holder of 100 shares which makes him way down the list as far as shareholders are concerned who amount to between 5 and 6 thousand i believe so i am hardly wishing to '' beat the club''s ownership '' as you put it Bor. I hold just as many shares as Mr.Fry and there are hundreds of fans who hold considerably more. Your assumption that i am looking for a stick to beat the Board with is far from the case.My gripe is that he is a continual absentee at board meetings, has a pathetic attendance record at AGM''s and to a far lesser degree is a non attender at games. As i have said before we were told that his vast social media army of followers makes it a useful way of promoting Norwich City throughout the world but that has not been happening for some considerable time now.I have no problem whatsoever with Stephen Fry as a man who has tremendous intelligence and wit and without doubt is a media darling and high profile TV star but there it ends. Had he been a Board member not in the media and TV spotlight i honestly do not think some on here would be so tolerent of his continued absense. Our seven Board members are running a business with a turnover of about £100 million and trying to move us forward and to my mind are carrying a passenger.Yep my opinion but for you to compare me to Wiz and his warped views and to suggest i am looking attempting to '' beat the club''s ownership'' is just mischief making but then again you are good at that Bor.[/quote]

    Huzzah!

  10. [quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="Wiz"][quote user="ruthers1"]What''s wrong with Leicester anyway? Best team in England currently and proving that a club of similar size to us can punch above their weight. Basically they''re where we could be IF our Board of Directors had an ounce of ambition.[/quote]

    Huzzah![/quote]And as sure as night follows day up pops another Nancy Negative. Hey Wiz what will be the score tomorrow then ?[/quote]

    0-2 Mr T.
×
×
  • Create New...