Jump to content

Greavsy

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    10,670

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Greavsy

  2. Posted

    38 minutes ago, wcorkcanary said:

    I never said anything of the sort, you sir , are a LIAR!! i say again....LIAR!! You also have a failing memory as i've told you before, many times , i do not answer your inane 'questions', now, do one. Divisive Cretin.

    You have your own staff Corkio - let alone being an agent for someone else! As if! 😉 

  3. Posted

    Seriously Essex, as much as you, like anyone else are entitled to post what you wish on here within reason (site rules / decency / personal info and the like) I really do suggest, as I have before, for your own sake you take some time away from this board / internet. 

    How much this is eating away at you is so evident &  isn't healthy for your general wellbeing.  

    We are all NCFC fans, and have a common bond in that (bar the scummers who pop up from time to time!) so as a fellow NCFC fan I wish you well, but seriously suggest you take time out. 

     

  4. Posted

    19 minutes ago, essex canary said:

    I lived 90 miles from Carrow Road for many years. I still had a season ticket and attended many away games. That wasn't easy based on family, work, affordability, travel etc. The logic of what you state though is that rather than negotiate these things and still go to Carrow Road, best not to and take the easy option of just going to away matches instead. In those days though thankfully such a 'lazy' system was not in place though students still went to Uni. How does the Club help Uni students now in relation to home ST'S?

    I'm sure the club were grateful. 

    Why do you struggle with what works for some people doesn't work for others? 

    OK so you went to games, when things were against it. fair play. Others have different priorities,  etc. They do what's right for them at the time. Simples.

    I seriously wonder for your well being. 

  5. Posted

    54 minutes ago, GMF said:

    The main purpose of the AGM is to approve the annual accounts, typically done in November, which would have been completely impractical from a timing perspective, as the season had already started.

    Notwithstanding that, there’s circa 6,850 shareholders, yet over 21,000 season ticket holders. Why give exclusivity on such things to just one subset of a much wider fan base?

    You really do need to think these things through properly before waving your club bashing stick around…

    have I got it wrong then - I thought then entire existence of the club was to satisfy and appease Essex in his every desire, and ratified at the AGM (or even Special GM's when required). 

    Sorry my mistake!  

  6. Posted

    3 minutes ago, essex canary said:

    Never mind. We may not make the playoffs anyway. Now the finger is being pointed at Knapper for thinning out the squad in January. None of the blokes are responsible. Just take a look at the person controlling the vision and strategy of the Club on a salary 4 times that of a Cabinet Minister. 

    Oh I forgot I can't say that as misogyny trumps freedom of expression.

     

    On a bike. 

    Give it a rest man, for your own sake, if not ours......

    Do other things in life eat away at you this much? 

     

  7. Posted

    5 minutes ago, wcorkcanary said:

    Morning G, they're a little moany about the damp weather, but they dont seem to realise that the water is good for the Salmon and Sea Trout run....which in turn means extra fish heads and tails in their gruel, ungrateteful bu66ers. 

    You spoil then, my friend. Make sure you keep them grounded and appreciative.

  10. Posted

    1 hour ago, essex canary said:

    So reward the loyalists like Supermarkets do. How are all these people who can't make Sheffield on a Tuesday night in April going to find it any easier on a Thursday or Friday night in May? (assuming we get there and extra support in Sheffield may have acted as a 12th man)

    The problem is that NCFC behave more like my now ex car insurance company who put up my renewal by 50% hoping I won't notice. Their suggestion that they can knock off 20% fell on deaf ears.

    You are aware the away allocation almost sold out last night ?  that's 2000 away fans on a Tuesday night. So not sure where the "extra support" you mention would have come from. It may have sold out after this was tweeted (X'd?) 

    https://x.com/NorwichCityFC/status/1777367749670338888

    Having seen my son return home from many a dull and lack lustre game / heavy defeat for many seasons,  but he still has the appetite to go again for the next away game I think loyalty is rewarded. He was there last night, and will be there Saturday, and intends to be for every remaining game of the season. Massive respect for that, and the others that do likewise.   

    I'm sure more people will find a way for any away fixture in the play off semi final - are you that dim?! 

    I'm sure you car insurance people are gutted to lose you - you are aware how the can insurance industry works? (Ive already regretted asking that). 

  11. Posted

    2 hours ago, essex canary said:

    A free 2024/25 Away Membership for those who went to Sheffield on a Tuesday in April, watched them throw away a 2 goal lead and got home in the small hours would be a good idea. That doesn't include me though would have done in the recent past.

     

    To a degree that's what happens with the current points system. The more away games you get the higher up the priority list you go. 

    Agreed you still have to pay for an away membership, but that's been done to death on here already.  

     

  13. Posted

    2 hours ago, essex canary said:

    If you had the priority for the League game at a Portman Road, you can bet you will have it for the play off semi whether there or elsewhere. Home games don't count in the mad NCFC world. Quite a few away games may not either unless you have paid the extra fee.

    Nor do match picks...which a lot of people had for Portman Road. 

     

  15. Posted

    14 minutes ago, treacletown07 said:

    Some of the binners are blaming the ball boys and girls for not throwing the ball back quick enough. 
     

    They didn’t mind the playoffs when they won it 20 odd years ago.

    They forget the fact they were timewasting before we scored.

    And that there are multiple balls around the ground for any of their players to collect and play on with. 

  16. Posted

    5 minutes ago, essex canary said:

    That is because many people have forgotten, the Club doesn't remind them in these messages and they end up paying when they shouldn't alongside the confusion the Club have created on the away issue. The other alternative is to withdraw it completely or the compromise not transferable as for the seat issue.

    Going back to the Play off issue, why should the potential risk of infiltration from opposition fans be any different at Wembley to what it was yesterday when the Club appeared to be neurotic about the possibility?

    As far as their own demand is concerned we all know the Club's track record for estimation is woeful. As an example the other way round the 2002 share offer was seeking sales of 214,000 to the public and achieved only 62,216, less than 30%.

    The new Ombudsman is a Barrister and may take a tougher view on 'opportunity to purchase.'

    Strong Fan Engagement ought to facilitate these issues being pursued and firm logical answers secured.

    Oh bore off Essex. 

    You have had a point 6/12/18 months ago, certainly seems like a lifetime of your incessant whinging in here.

    We beat our local rivals yesterday, knocked them off top spot, are in a healthy play of position, the sun is out. Cheer up man.

    I'm off out for some Sunday league. 

  18. Posted

    48 minutes ago, TIL 1010 said:

    As you no longer have access to away tickets due to no longer being an AD and because you are not an away member you appear somewhat concerned about where you will be in the pecking order for Wembley tickets.

    See what you done there Tilly, mentioning pecking order after point 20 in the pic, discussing bird droppings! 

    Were they taking aim at Essex too? 

  20. Posted

    10 minutes ago, essex canary said:

    Quite simply Article 8 should make reference to seats for life too whether original purchasers only or otherwise. Relative to the 1 share membership benefit, 'otherwise' would still be pro-rata a very modest return for1,000 shares. The maths would tell you that.

    I think you are the only person who needs 'for life' explaining. 

    And given your form even if it was mentioned you'd still disagree. 

×
×
  • Create New...