LeJuge

[quote user="RUDOLPH HUCKER"]Amazing MK wanted to win through to the next round; surely progress in the cup will interfere with their promotion ambitions?[/quote]Doubt they will win automatic anyway, seen the size of their squad? They only have about 16 or 17 grown ups, not much more than Portsmouth did last year. They only have 6 defenders, and two of those are 19 and hardly ever played for their first team. In fact 7 of the 21 players that they currently have registered are forwards. Unless they make a good four of five signings, I would bet against them maintining their current form.

[quote user="G"][quote user="RUDOLPH HUCKER"]The fans are entitled to boo because unlike a number of our players they actually turned up tonight.[/quote] But what is booing actually doing? Making us look like we are pretty ungrateful to the players and that after 1 loss we don''t support them, if we had lost our last 4 and had just been relegated to league 1 i can understand it but after successive promotions these players have given there all for this club. I would have been going. [/quote]Since when do we have to be in any way ''grateful'' to the players? We support them, but that doesn''t mean that we have to worship them when they don''t do their job well enough. We show our appreciation when they deserve it, we show our discontent when they don''t. What would the players expect? A standing ovation? That''s life, and if any of those players were watching their own favourite teams they wouldn''t be too happy either.

[quote user="Mister Chops"]Hardly a "reserve" team line-up either, Wilbraham and Smith excepted....13 Rudd02 R Martin03 Drury06 Whitbread (Lappin 71)26 Ayala (De Laet 77)11 Surman14 Hoolahan (Morison 63)15 Fox18 Smith10 Jackson21 WilbrahamLosing 4-0 to MK Dons suggests it was little more than a training game, which is harsh on the 13,000 who paid money to watch.[/quote]I add Drury and Rudd to that list of reserve players, probably Lappin if you want to count the subs. There is no way that Lambert intends to use Drury this year, if we have the centre backs available then De Laet will play left back if Tierney gets injured or suspended.

[quote user="RUDOLPH HUCKER"]The fans are entitled to boo because unlike a number of our players they actually turned up tonight.[/quote]Yes your right, nothing wrong with a bit of a boo to shake them up. I bet they would be getting a lot worse from Lambert and Culverhouse, perhaps with the exception of Whitbread who has had an injury and Ayala who is "settling in". Really not convinced by that Ayala bloke though, he looked lightweight, and a bit of a headless chicken if you ask me. The excuse was that he doesn''t know everybodies name. That isn''t an excuse for not knowing what yellow looks like, unless you are colour blind.

Am I the only person who finds this deeply worrying? These are players that we will have to rely on at times during this season.That''s 11 of our 25 men in the best league in the world. Lambert ALWAYS wants to win, all this not being bothered stuff is stupid, he would want to win if he was managing the under 8''s for a day in a friendly against Burton Albion under 8''s, he will be furious.In that team were the keeper that we have to rely on if Ruddy gets injured, the left back that we have to play if Tierney gets injured, a right back who everybody thought was one of our best players before getting ripped to shreds by Victor Moses, two of our only four fit centre backs, including one that we just paid more for than we spent on Grant Holt. A centre mid who people were tipping to be the next Charlie Adam, Hoolahan who is a first teamer, and Surman and Jackson who saw some action on Sunday. These aren''t players who aren''t going to get a look in, it wasn''t even our reserve squad, it was half of our first team squad. I think that it was a terrible result, I wasn''t there but the scoreline speaks for itself. How a team consisting of Martin, Whitbread, Smith, Fox, Hoolahan, Surman, and Jackson, can lose at home to a League one team is beyond me. Lambert will care, he will be bloody furious, and so should everybody who paid for a ticket. I don''t think that its the slightest bit disgusting that people booed them off, if you pay for a ticket then you have the right too, frankly. I should imagine that a few of them got some home truths.

[quote user="Bethnal Yellow and Green"][quote user="LeJuge"][quote user="Nexus_Canary"]Frankly sickening, I know Arse have had a pretty torrid time yet Man City ?I hate these guys worse than Chelski in thier bid to buy a trophey cabinet. I would have though some of these players would have more class than to move to the likes of Man City :(At least Manure are a respectable club in many ways and Fergie (love or hate him ) is a man that commands respect.English football is just cruising down the toilet with Chelski and MoneyCheat City leading them down.[/quote]It''s Wenger''s fault. He had built up a kitty of £110m and his players and fans were desperate for him to use that to buy experienced players. Fabregas stayed on the promise that the club would challenge for trophies, Nasri then watched their only truly world class player leave. That £110m was built up BEFORE the departure of Fabregas too. Instead of the top class experienced keeper, defender, and striker that the squad wanted and the fans wanted, he went and spent £15m on a player who won''t be ready for first team football for four years. How long does Wenger expect the likes of Nasri and Fabregas to wait for a bunch and 19 or 20 year olds to become good enough?Wenger is losing the plot, Arsenal attendances are falling (well, season ticket sales have anyway), and their squad will be lucky to finish in the top six. Nasri apparently turned down a move to Chelsea when joining Arsenal, so clearly expected better things and wasn''t all out for the money. [/quote]Yep it''s all the fault of the one manager who wants to train up young players instead of forking out millions for them.And your comment about season tickets is just plain wrong - Arsenal have a waiting list of 60,000 and it generally takes about 8 years to get one.Wenger took Arsenal to an unbeaten season when the most expensive player in his squad cost £11m. [/quote]My heart bleeds for a club with £110m stashed away but still hiked up season ticket prices for their fans this year. I stand corrected about the season ticket waiting lists. Arsenal won''t win a single other thing under Wenger. The cheapest season ticket at Arsenal is £951 by the way. Your reference to the unbeaten season only really serves to support my point though. Wenger has lost the plot. In that squad you had Lehmann, Lauren, Campbell, and Bergkamp. None of those were bought young. Unless Wenger is prepared to buy experience like he used to, they won''t win a single other trophy under his management.They haven''t won anything for 6 years mate, he is old news, he has lost the plot just like Rafa Benitez lost the plot a Liverpool. His most successful team still had Dixon, Seamen, Keown, Adams, Bergkamp, Wiltord, and Kanu in it.His own reputation went to his head, and he began to believe that he was a genuis with a midas touch who could turn every player into a Vieira or Henry. So he started buying nothing but kids. You don''t win anything with kids, as he proves year in year out in the League Cup and FA Cup. Go and look at that 2000/2001 squad, count the kids. He didn''t always used to manage this way, and that is why I believe (and many Arsenal fans believe) that he is losing the plot.He is simply stubborn, and that is precisely why he turns down the chance to buy world class strikers and perseveres with distinctly average  players like Bendtner and Almunia. The fact that he has lost the plot and Arsenal look less like winning something every year is precisely the reason why Fabregas, Clichy, and Nasri have left. The former had been desperate for years for Wenger to sign a few top class players.

[quote user="Gingerpele"]This is ridiculous, one player on that much There only a Russian team, they could probably get 5-6 quality players with that much and completely dominate the rest of the teams in their league, one player can''t change everything. (unless of course they have already signed other decent players) http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/14610186.stm[/quote]They have already bought Yuri Zhirkov from Chelsea and Balasz Dzsudzak from PSV, they must have an Abramovich type figure at the helm. Roberto Carlos plays for them too. Can anybody really blame Eto''o though? He only plays for Cameroon so isn''t going to have to be in a top league to get his International call ups, is 30 so this is probably his last massive contract, unless he goes to Qatar after that, and the tax rate is a mere 13%. He is getting paid £345,000, on which he is taxed just 13%, for three years. In fact, I think he is getting £345k after tax. Nobody has shown any real loyalty to Eto''o though, have they? He scored 36 goals in his last season at Barcelona before being used as a part of the package to get Ibrahimovich, they paid about £40m and Eto''o for Ibrahimovic, who only scored 16 goals in his first season before being shipped out on loan. He certainly didn''t owe La Liga anything, he suffered horrific racial abuse and broke down in tears numerous times on the pitch. Then at Inter, they made no real effort to keep him, preferring to cash in. They had their price, and the price was met. The clubs are just as guilty of being greedy as the players. He went for about £30m. So Inter Milan have pretty much sold Ibrahimovic to Barcelona for £70m, when you add the Eto''o revenues. When a club makes a profit it is called "business", when a player looks for money it is called "greed", yet at the top of those clubs are people who slice off profit as dividends.... so players are entitled to use football as a business too. He didn''t owe Inter anything either, they got the price that they asked for. They are currently in breech of UEFA regulations for spending too much money as well. Eto''o had a three year deal there, they didn''t have to cash in.Eto''o had his best ever season last year, 37 goals including 21 in Serie A. Inter Milan chose to sell, and are now after Kaka and Forlan. African players are often the most generous with their cash anyway, they give a lot away to African countries, so I''m not bothered. He has a charity helping mothers and children in Cameroon, and helps set up telecommunications, he has another charity called Fundesport which does a similar thing to Bellamys charity, his transfer to Russia was delayed because he was in Cameroon opening a new hospital which he helped pay for. I think its Drogba who gives half of his money away, and it is said that Eto''o does more than most players too. We need to look at our own super rich footballers and see what charities they have, it says a lot that Bellamy is one of the few British players to give a fair bit back, you would never see the Ashley Cole Foundation or the John Terry Trust, just wouldn''t happen. Fair play to him, money from Russian crooks going back into Africa, I''m all for it.

[quote user="Nexus_Canary"]Frankly sickening, I know Arse have had a pretty torrid time yet Man City ?I hate these guys worse than Chelski in thier bid to buy a trophey cabinet. I would have though some of these players would have more class than to move to the likes of Man City :(At least Manure are a respectable club in many ways and Fergie (love or hate him ) is a man that commands respect.English football is just cruising down the toilet with Chelski and MoneyCheat City leading them down.[/quote]It''s Wenger''s fault. He had built up a kitty of £110m and his players and fans were desperate for him to use that to buy experienced players. Fabregas stayed on the promise that the club would challenge for trophies, Nasri then watched their only truly world class player leave. That £110m was built up BEFORE the departure of Fabregas too. Instead of the top class experienced keeper, defender, and striker that the squad wanted and the fans wanted, he went and spent £15m on a player who won''t be ready for first team football for four years. How long does Wenger expect the likes of Nasri and Fabregas to wait for a bunch and 19 or 20 year olds to become good enough?Wenger is losing the plot, Arsenal attendances are falling (well, season ticket sales have anyway), and their squad will be lucky to finish in the top six. Nasri apparently turned down a move to Chelsea when joining Arsenal, so clearly expected better things and wasn''t all out for the money.

[quote user="jas the barclay king"]so which legend will be in attendence? because i can only see an above Average winger who came back for a failed 2nd spell and I wouldnt want Aviva in trouble for false advertising ;)[/quote]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvfOfeuYGT0&feature=fvsrLook forward to seeing your own compilation of skills Jas? This is from Paul''s own YouTube channel.

[quote user="alysha"]To be fair to the OP - the same person who tweeted about Lansbury just posted " Here is the pic of Lansbury my mate was on about on his pinkun thread" The picture does look like Lansbury from what I can see, I''m not sure of the background though, is he at that BB sandwich and muffin place OP?[/quote]I would be happy to look at the BB sandwich and muffin place, if you were to share the Twitter link, but I''m not searching Twitter on the off chance that I may find a random tweet.

[quote user="ellis206"]It took me a 114 attempts to get through for tickets vs Wigan and it has cost me £44 on my phone bill, cost me more than the flippin tickets, hope its not going to be the same for every match!! [/quote]Can''t you just buy them online? I bought four Stoke tickets for visiting friends last Thursday online, and the entire process was completely effortless. It took about 5 minutes, and the booking cost was £1.50.... can''t remember if it was £1.50 for all four, or £1.50 each ticket, but even if it was £6 it is a lot lower than £44! Unless it is different for away tickets? But pretty certain you can get them online too?

[quote user="Chelmsford Canary"][quote user="ncfcstar"][quote user="InLambertWeTrust"]I''m 19 years old so I have an U21 season ticket, sorry if this offends you....     [/quote]Get a grip CT, the thread is about people who have defrauded the club!!!  To be honest this makes a mockery of all the people complaining about having to provide documentation to prove they were u21.  Yes the club may have gone about it in a funny way, but they''ve been proven right by their actions.  Another good move by Mr. McNally in my opinion.[/quote] I don''t understand why some people are so offended by providing proof! It should not be a problem if your actually the right age. I guess the people who are upset are those that have been carrying out the fraud[/quote]As far as I recall most of them were unhappy that the club left it so long to ask them, seeing as they renewed and paid months earlier. A few of the fans who were moaning we doing so because of the grave inconvenience and cost, mainly because they had to present themselves with their ID at the ground. If you live 90 miles away and travel up to games, then the cost associated with taking a day off work and doing a 180 mile round trip to give them a piece of paper that they could have given them prior to a game at the end of last season, it was more the principle of the way that the club did it. Mainly the assumption that it would be easy for all fans because they all live within the City walls, something that we know not to be true, and certainly something which the club themselves surely don''t aspire too? I''m not sure how old you are, but would you be happy getting a train from Chelmsford and back to give your passport? If you could have done it at application stage? No, you wouldn''t, so there is your answer.

[quote user="Nexus_Canary"]Lifeban !!!![/quote]A life ban is a bit extreme, there may be a time in future when permanently severing ties with 200 fans will be seen as a silly move, I can remember us getting 12000 for a few league games in The Championship towards the end of the Chase days. Let''s put it into a bit of perspective, they haven''t thrown coins at corner takers, or racially abused a substitute, I think a one year ban is sufficient punishment here, they miss our first year back in the Premier League, and will have to join the waiting list like everybody else next year. That will probably result in them having to buy casual tickets, so the club will recoup a fair bit of that cash.They no doubt feel slightly ashamed and embarressed and most will learn their lesson. Some people just don''t have the brain cells unfortunately. I doubt we will see any posters here owning up to getting caught though ;-)

[quote user="Simon Lappin King Of Spain"]Bloomin''eck. I thought I would never see the day when people started to praise Ruddy. He was outstanding last year and when people started saying he wasn''t good enough I got a little annoyed. You have to give him the chance and after the last 2 weeks I am pleased people have finally realised his potential![/quote]I myself wouldn''t have said that he was outstanding last year, but I do think that he was ''decent'' last year, and furthermore I saw him as a keeper that was continually improving. Even big Ruddy fans (and I am one of them) can admit that he started off very shakily, he came with big boots to fill, but I always thought that he would fill them. I think the problem started with that awful display against Everton in pre-season where his former team mates had to defend him..... he was trying too hard after that. I think that this is another Lambert success story, a less patient manager would have done something rash, Lambert stuck by him and gave him his full confidence. In the second half of the season I felt a lot more confident with Ruddy between the sticks, and was always telling people that Ruddy is still very young for a keeper. I think it''s full steam ahead from now on, to think that most keepers peak in their early thirties, he could be an absolute gem. Whereas Carson and Kirkland simply haven''t filled their potential (one had enough and went to Turkey, the other is second choice at Wigan), I suspect Ruddy is going to show everybody this year that he has always been under rated. I hadn''t even heard of him before we signed him.

Surprised to not see a thread dedicated to Ruddy today, if Bradley Johnson should get one then Ruddy should.The bloke made three or four quality saves, caught every cross, and had no chance with the goal. His kicking wasn''t perfect in the second half, but that''s a minor thing.After also having by all accounts played well at Wigan too, is it fair to say that some of his harshest critics on here should begin to start thinking about searching Google for humble pie recipes?On the basis of his first two performances this year I wouldn''t swap him for Forster, and for me he looked as commanding as Greeno did for us (where he played his best football).When you look at Al-Habsi going for £4m, it''s about time people woke up and realised that we have a great keeper, and the grass really isn''t any greener. Good keepers aren''t cheap, neither are they in abundance, I''ve been saying that he will come good and I suspect he is potentially a City legend in the making.When you look at the quality of keepers managing to get England caps in recent years, I wouldn''t rule him out of the reckoning. I wouldn''t take Scott Carson or Chris Kirkland over him, and is Ben Foster really any better?

[quote user="Lambert is King"]Strange how fans have different opinions to the men at the top. I watched Stoke train today and it was all about how to stop Hoolahan ( and Fox ). To match them up will require a really strange system as they will be playing 4 big guys at the back that automatically changes to 3 at the back when they have the ball. Jones will be a lone attacker but will have balls to his feet and will receive out wide. Their cunning plan is to hit our full backs with Huth Wilkinson Pennant and Etherington. They were huge. In fairness to them as well there was no talk of a high ball.   [/quote]Do you mind me asking where they were training? It''s unusual for a team to let people watch them train the day before a game. Can you explain a bit more about how Huth is going to cause any trouble whatsoever to our full backs? Are you saying that Stoke are going to play with a giant 6 foot 3 inch left back? That seems a bit odd to me, BUT, if true.... then I 100% want to see Elliott Bennett down that right hand side. It would be bizarre to see Huth playing there, considering they have James Collins, Danny Pugh, and Danny Higginbotham, who can all play left back. That makes me wonder whether either you got Huth mixed up with somebody else, or assumed that they had their XI on the pitch, or.... hate to say it.... whether you are telling the truth. That would be a bit like us playing Zak Whitbread at right back for the sake of it, with Martin or Naughton on the bench, just wouldn''t happen.

In addition, if they pull a miracle out of the bag and do finish in the top 6, you will all have forgotten about this thread and I can remind you of the other one. Call it spread betting :P

Well, perhaps only beaten by Mark Lawrenson predicting our relegation from League 1. I said that Ipswich would fight for a top 6 spot this year under Jewell, I may as well call a big fat prediction fail now before somebody else reminds me of it when Ipswich get relegated.I could not imagine a more pleasing thing to be 100% wrong about though. Relegation beckons for the scum I think. Fair play, most of you called this. Would be great to see them suffer a year or two in League One after their ridicule of us in our relegation season, with hopefully several years in that league like Leeds. A win tomorrow for City and this will be right up there with one of the best footy weekends of the season for us.

[quote user="macdougalls perm"][quote user="Norfolk Mustard"] Some think McNamnee doing is somehow doing a ''good deed''? I don''t agree. The lad our footballer is harbouring is an alledged thug. Let him stand trial and if proven guilty take his punishment - just like all the rest of the disruptive little s**** who were just waiting for an excuse to behave like they did. Yes, MacNamee can have who he wants in his house; but Norwich fans are paying for it. Unlike the lad who appears to be somewhat averse to paying for things he took a fancy to. Allegedly.     [/quote] You quite obviously don''t understand what the word ''harbour'' means. How is he harbouring him when authorities have placed the kid with him? And you''re not paying for it, Macnamee is. Do you consider the money in your bank account to be yours or is it still the property of the employer you earned it from? Some people .... honestly [:|]   [/quote]Don''t worry about it, we have already ascertained that this thread is populated by 16 year olds, whilst we know that there are plenty of Daily Mail readers around. I suspect that Norfolk Mustard was a regular News of the World customer.

Why is this thread even still on the board?If a thread about any ''alleged'' crime relating to a footballer is posted it is deleted promptly for fear of libel or putting a case in jeopardy. Does one rule apply to those with money, and another rule apply to those without?

[quote user="Mrs Tierney"]I support every player for our team. From Holt to Steven Smith. one thing that irritates me is when our own fans verbally abuse a player for doing something wrong. I heard De Laet get called a tw*t on sat. what kind of support is that?[/quote]You will always get that, and always will.To be fair, some of it was justified in the Roeder days and the end of the Worthington days. I was happy to give Fotheringham some stick, and Carl Robinson didn''t often seem to break a sweat. But we have just won two successive promotions, some people will never be happy. I seem to remember Greeno sticking his fingers up at the Riverend once too, before never playing again because of the inevitable stick he would have got. Steven Smith is a slightly different proposition, he has actually cost us money and forced us into having three senior left backs in the squad.

[quote user="smooth"]Lets put the riot talk to one side. McNamee is doing something he truely believes in. I admire him for it. I don''t think he has been to public with it, so again not going for a good PR. But believes he can offer something for the individual that with the parents and groups with interest can be of good to the individual. Fair play to him, now yes I would rather he was looking for a club. But we''ll see, still think those palyers that do not go on loan or at least move this year will not be offered contracts the year after. It is a very competitive industry where those fringe players in the championship all the way down have to work hard to get work, in fact former prem players do to, j lloyd samuel etc. As always the strength of player power is at the very high end, the Lampards etc. once you are a championship player you do have some clout but there are always new boys coming through or europe where we can pick up players. A career could be soon very similar to that of an American Footballer who is training kids at a summer camp and then get a one year contract at the league minimum to return to professional sports. In fact some have been known to be wroking in supermarkets and then getting a call about playing in the nfl. Our footballers have to be aware they can be thrown off this cart very easily and unless they have a back up they will be struggling without a career or very poor job prospects.[/quote]Agree with your sentiment there, it''s a short career at best, plenty of players quit at 21/22, and these days whilst it is more likely that a footy player is in good physical condition in his mid thirties, he has to get the contracts! Look at Simon Whaley, playing at pretty much Wroxham level now in front of a couple of hundred fans. I reckon McNamee would have no trouble getting a deal in League 1 to be honest, but nobody can blame him for taking his time finding the right move whilst he is on decent money. He would be a good player for a League 1 team, he was for us.

[quote user="cityangel"][quote user="Gene Tierney"] http://www.metro.co.uk/news/872690-norwich-citys-anthony-mcnamee-houses-brixton-riots-suspectLooks like he intends on stating here...[/quote]   He played a part in last season, is still considered a fringe player and is employed by the club with a contract so he''s entitled to get paid just like anyone else is. How can people slag down  our own players in such a nasty way is beyond me. [/quote]Well said, we got promoted as a squad not as an XI.

[quote user="Gene Tierney"][quote user="LeJuge"][quote user="Gene Tierney"][quote user="TIL 1010"][quote user="LeJuge"] he was seen waving a bottle[/quote] He was charged with violent disorder for heavens sake.You will be saying next that anybody charged with burglary was found wandering around inside a shop that was closed for business. [/quote]Do you reckon a perv could get away with the excuse that he only happened to be waving his penis around near a kiddies playground?[/quote]What a stupid and slightly sick analogy, likening somebody causing a bit of trouble in a riot to a peadophile. Do you know how many mature middle aged men with respectable families and decent jobs got into a spot of bother as a kid? People deserve second chances just as much as they deserve punishment. The reaction to the riots, asides from the most serious of offenders (e.g. arsonists) is ludicrious and way out of proportion. Locking people up for 6 months for stealing a £2 bottle of water is only going to further alienate the youth of today from society. Most of the kids involved were no worse than football hooligans in the seventies, and no worse than those Norwich lads who got put down for violence in Leicester, yet people were quick to glorify the hooligan mobs when they turned vigilantes in the aftermath of the first few days of trouble. Manchester United at Carrow Road anybody? Public disorder is not a new thing, it is an ancient thing. Some kids change, some kids don''t, but they are no worse than anybody else who commits a criminal offence. It''s not as if ALL of the types of crimes committed in the London riots aren''t committed in every major city every day of the week is it? When relativity is applied, it sounds as if the lad in question is a pretty minor offender in the grand scheme of things. For a start, they don''t give bail to dangerous or prolific criminals, he would have been kept on remand. Secondly, there were murders and attempted murders committed, serious acts of arson, and mass depletion of shop stock (and I''m talking about organized gangs filling vans full of iPhones). "violent disorder" is a charge which suggests no actual physical damage had been caused to humans or human property, else he would be charged with ABH, GBH, Assault, or criminal damage. That makes him, in the grand scheme of things, no worse than the kids that frequent footy grounds countrywide at 3pm each Saturday to have scuffles with the police and with opposing fans. It shouldn''t even have made news, it wouldn''t in any other week. If only you knew the stuff that happens each week that doesn''t make the paper, I was privy to those records for one particular court for some time. Christ, you lot would lose the plot if you knew what really went on week in week out. The London Riots were an inevitable eventually, a realisation of the ineffectiveness of our social policies and our inadequate police force. I can call the police force inadequate if I wish, seeing as i NEVER see any patrolling my area, and the only time that I have EVER had to call them they didn''t bother turning up and three hours later I was in hospital. No point in getting tough on crime now, the damage is already done, and we can all expect more riots. [/quote]They''re all as ****ing bad as each other you muppet.  All the rioters share responsibility for the murder of those young men. All the rioters share responsibility of the act of arson.  All the rioters share responsibility for terrorising the streets.  As far as I''m concerned they''re all delinquent tosspots, and people who try and defend are the same. Why? because you never hear of personal responsibility, just lame excuses blaming everything else except the knuckle draggers themselves. Plus violent disorder is a group threatening violence, which causes the public to be fearful... FFS[/quote]What complete tosh. All of the rioters should share responsibility for murder and arson? What a complete load of crap you talk. When somebody dies on Prince of Wales Road after a punch to the head, should all 8000 drinkers share responsibility for that? What a complete load of carp.  Complete rubbish.

[quote user="諾維奇城"][quote user="LeJuge"][quote user="諾維奇城"]I get the impression AM is more interested in his music than football at the moment by looking at his facebook page...[/quote]Lot''s of people have interests away from their day job, otherwise what kind of life would we all be living? They are footballers, not catholic priests! We can assume that your interest out of work is searching for people that you don''t know on Facebook? Are you more interested in facebook than your job by any chance? [/quote] I was just pointing out that maybe he has fallen out of love with game a little, happens to alot of footballers, im probably wrong but no need to get abusive about it. So based on the fact im freinds with AM on Facebook makes me a stalker? Well by looking at your posts and the amount you have made in recent months your an over opinionated TW@T!!![/quote]If you are friends with him on Facebook then why not ASK him if he has fallen out of love with the game. The idea that somebody can''t be into two things at once is ludicrious, Dion Dublin didn''t seem to have fallen out of love with the game whilst he was inventing a percussion instrument did he? Matt Gill is doing alright, despite owning half a tennis club?