wessex_exile

Pretty much sums up my impression of him to be honest MC, and don''t worry, I don''t.

Oh dear Wiz, are you sure about that timeline, do I have to post the entire thread on here to demonstrate that the one somewhat childish comment from a.n.other was actually before you even joined the discussion? You managed to cope admirably thereafter for a day or so, just stumbled and fell by the wayside when the subject matter got a little difficult for you. We can carry it on here if you want? (do one? how old are you FFS?)

The thing is Wizard, you had the chance for a healthy grown-up discussion, and you ran away when it got a bit difficult for you. I''ve not got a problem with anyone who wants to take the pish if they can also engage in some reasoned debate. That''s something you are incapable of - and that''s why you''ve been banned.

Not particularly Attleborough, it''s all over our OMB, someone else has the detective skills, I merely pass on the results. The link is at the bottom of the message btw, it''s the bit that starts http:// etc. Highlight, copy, paste into your internet browser, press return and hey presto...

Would appear that the "twonk who sent the e-mail" features very prominently on Pg 23 of your Corporate Canary 2009-10 brochure - VERY prominently indeed. What''s his connection with the club to be afforded that sort of privilege? http://www.canaries.co.uk/staticFiles/c0/38/0,,10355~145600,00.pdf

You couldn''t be bothered posting any of the many "not really good enough to hold down a first team place, a good eye for a pass but too lightweight for a commanding midfield role" comments then?

Selling a player we got on a Bosman and who struggled to establish himself in the first team? Don''t know why you think that makes our chairman look like an a*? Just means we''ve got even more of your money.

Read the Commission ruling, it quite clearly states at the end "The League Regulations permit either club to appeal".

You have a point - lazy workshy idle feckers - it''s the lecturers I feel sorry for though, poor dears...

It''s half term numbnuts, not summer hols, as my teenage children will often remind me. Just trying to stimulate some healthy discussion elsewhere, no need to get your knickers in a twist.

s''okay, he''s turned up now...

We don''t have to pay for sand, just get Sarfend to shake out their flip-flops and beach towels every time they visit...

P.S. We got £400k and an embargo on signing any CUFC staff or players when Parky and Ayles went to Hull, so I''d expect that''ll be our minimum position in negotiations - and given that was nearly 4 years ago, I''d say you could safely up that to £500k for the Lambert Three.

They will if they want to lose - who we replaced Lambert with, and how well he''s doing is utterly irrelevant to the case. If you burgled someone''s stereo and got caught, would your first line of defence be that they''ve replaced it with a better model via the insurance so no harm done? Thought not - now try thinking things through a bit more...

Who knows, maybe "Who would you prefer to go up with us Leeds or Colchester?" might come back to haunt you?