Jacoljam

Holt! Yes!

No. He supported Glasgow Rangers.

I''ve always considered him to be a w*nker.

[quote user="Evil Monkey"]The arrogance on show here is shocking... they should have filled the ground because they were playing the top of the table club? Get over yourselves, ffs.  We may be top of the league but that league is League 1... Division 3, in old money.  The grounds in this league may be ramshackle and run down, but they''ve got a hell of a lot more charm about them than the likes of Bellend Road, and certainly more than some of the soulless Premiership grounds.We may be a ''bigger club'' than the likes of Oldham, but if we don''t keep such arrogance in check then we''ll only end up like bitter Leeds fans thinking we''re too good to be in this league...[/quote]Agreed.At least we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.Some of these clubs are stuck here for life.

Yes! I f*cking love Grant Holt.

[quote user="RUDOLPH HUCKER"]Picture yourself in a ground on a river With tangy entrees and marvellous pies Goreham calls Adams, who answers quite slowly A team-sheet he carefully eyes McNamee playing in yellow and green With Hughes towering over his head Looks out for Rusty - no FA surprise Cos’ he’s gone. {CHORUS} Loosely in disguise the diamond, Loosely in disguise the diamond, Loodely in disguise the diamond, Ah... Ah... {VERSE 2} At one nil down we a climbing a mountain We’re freaking hoarse people who fear humble pies Everyone smiles: Oli drifts past defenders He scores: an incredible high. Newspaper headlines appear on the floor Waiting to be taken away Climbing the league with our head in the clouds And we’re strong {CHORUS} Picture yourself on a train in a station, With binmen for porters with tears in their eyes. Roy Keane and coaches appear on the platform, All clutching their P45’s. {CHORUS REPEATED AND FADED}[/quote]Where can i buy this?

[quote user="paul ncfc"]The really annoying fans are the ones that come on here to complain about other supporters. [;)][/quote]Well said!

It''s not the first time that you''ve made negative comments about our fans.

[quote user="Mister Chops"]But if you play Hoolahan and Hughes in centre midfield you need Hughes in the anchor role because Hoolahan will not do the defensive duties a CM player needs.  So you end up playing Hughes behind Hoolahan, and then you have a wider diamond again.  I don''t think Hoolahan can play in a 4-4-2 unless he is one of the 2 up front. For me, the diamond is all about accomodating Wes, and I wouldn''t want to drop League 1''s best playmaker.[/quote]I agree, we do have to build round Hoolihan or drop him.

[quote user="Mister Chops"]But if you play Hoolahan and Hughes in centre midfield you need Hughes in the anchor role because Hoolahan will not do the defensive duties a CM player needs.  So you end up playing Hughes behind Hoolahan, and then you have a wider diamond again.  I don''t think Hoolahan can play in a 4-4-2 unless he is one of the 2 up front. For me, the diamond is all about accomodating Wes, and I wouldn''t want to drop League 1''s best playmaker.[/quote]Agreed.

[quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]McNamee was not effective against Brentford and he was not effective yesterday.  In a  442 or a diamond he needs to work and defend,  as esp yest he needed to contribute working back and he did not. Against Millwall he made an impact,  but not a difference.  Walsall he had a good game.   But as we have seen with Cody and OJ there is a huge difference between being a starter and a sub.  But you have not answered my question on why we should go 4-4-2 when that compromises 4 positions when the diamond, also flawed,  plays to our strengths. The diamond works better with Drury;  he gets forward and plays football, bringing Lappin into the game more.  On such small changes success and failure is built.  442 is an option,   but it is as flawed,  if not more so, than the diamond.   Just my opinion,  just as yours is about the cracked diamond,  but neither of us are numbskulls for voicing that opinion;   stating that just undermines yours.    Is less an issue of how you accomodate McNammee,  more of how you do while keeping Hoolahan, Martin and Holt in the same side. [/quote]Very good point.[:D]

Why not...."We blinking love Grant Holt"That won''t offend any c*nt.

I think we should play the midfield that has helped get us 63 points.

2 -2

Good luck Jamie.We will miss your occasional goal.

Bean.

He has certainly played his part in our recent success.

Good post.

Lambert will change it,when it''s time to change it.

Yes we f*cking do!

Completely agree.

Riches to rags.........The Roy Keane story.

 Thank you Dead Canary.[:)]

Signed.

I''ll take second place at the end of the season.