Jump to content

Katie Borkins

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


Everything posted by Katie Borkins

  1. Yeah, that''s the spirit lads. A tough 1-0 would be okay but you know what will happen tomorrow: We win easily = "well, it was only Rotherham" We win narrowly = "won''t go up playing like that against good teams" We don''t win = SACK ALEX NEIL Tomorrow is essentially a free pass for the doom merchants. Fill your boots, lads.
  2. "do you actually just come on here for an argument?" Some days yes, some days no.
  3. So.... "I witnessed several games the two seasons he was at Norwich and every single one was competitive and played in good spirit, with good performances from the players." "Why didn''t we score goals? The midfield would give the ball away too easily, the wingers were too ineffective, the attackers didn''t get enough chances to get their confidence and we let in soft goals." Contradicting yourself in two paragraphs is excellent work. This is why you get stick; you spout gibberish.
  4. "Could Sainsburys Yeast extract be our Marmite? they aree very similar in lots of ways.......... " Oh, you Jar size and weight...
  5. "Grab them by the pussy, you can do anything." Awesome.
  6. If the standard is "mildly intelligent and literate" then I am happy setting a bar that low. And well done on your limbo dancing career.
  7. His track record of spotting talent, bringing in quality players and his passion for creative attacking football would make him a must have for our national side. Didn''t we just have a 0-0 against Slovenia?. Maybe he already has it.
  8. Well done. It takes a lot of effort to sound that retarded.
  9. I think you need to deploy a spelling check. Otherwise how is anyone supposed to know what your questions are?
  10. Maybe you having an opinion on football instead of calling out other posters, you sorry c*nt.
  11. "So if a player isn''t in the first team, he''s not as good as someone who is?" No, I did say that hence reference to tactics. You pick your best players for the system and tactics you want to deploy. So if you want a destructive DM you pick Tettey, if you want more of a ball player then you pick Dorrans. What you do though is pick your best players for the system you want to play. You don''t chuck in the understudies unless it is a relatively unimportant game. We are all about getting back into the Premier League so every league game MUST see AN pick the best players for each position based on the tactics and formation.
  12. Could they just deploy the car advert on the left?
  13. It''s not about equality though. This isn''t a commune. Some players are better than others. Even allowing for tactical decisions there will be a hierarchy in every position. Under studies know their place. It''s like when you go to a theatre show in London. In the afternoon you might get an understudy or two but for the main evening show you get the star names unless illness etc. Every club wants a settled first team. That''s how you get the great performances and great runs. Changing the team just to keep our second rate players happy is weak management and we should not do it.
  14. I would reward our players who have shown excellent form recently and name an unchanged team unless injury means we need to change up. I would be minded to have a proper look at Pritchard as an early substitution if the game was going our way so perhaps give Wes 60 minutes and then sub on Pritchard.
  15. Alex Neil is going to make us all go blind, Daly? What are you talking about, man?
  16. STFU in popping up to provoke argument shocker.
  17. Apparently according to my father Jimi Hendrix played the Orford Cellar in 1967.
  18. Not sure it sends the right message when you appoint a manager who cashed in on a penalty shootout miss by making adverts out of it.
  • Create New...