Stevee Wonder

2 words - false dichotomy

Lol. I took mine to Southampton (2-0 loss) and MK Dons (scrapped a 1-1 draw) last season so maybe i should stop taking her too often. I''ll be keeping the work up this season lol...should be going to a few away games.

You guys (and gals) have let yourselves down. What you need to do is talk about Norwich so much they eventually support us. My missus is from Hull, so kinda supported them, but she didn''t really like football. Now she''s a fully fledged Canary...and always wears my old Norwich shirts :-) Get to work converting everyone lol

That was the England call-up clause which was written off, not the sell-on clause.

I have a hamster at uni. He''s called Oli.

[quote user="greenTshirt"][quote user="Stevee Wonder"] [quote user="greenTshirt"]Paul Jewell now joint favourite Oh well, it''s be a fun day [/quote] Where did you see that? [/quote] betfair - actually I was a bit premature - jewel slipped out again to 4/1 - Lambert is 7/2. But Jewell''s odds are all over the place Betfair are a bit more reliable in the next manager markets - the bookies are totally unreliable when it comes to books on very weak markets. Basically Lambert is a false favourite - if there was any truth in this he would be much much shorter in the betting - say around 1/5 [/quote]   Agreed, if the bookies knew anything it would be much shorter, at the moment they''re just reacting to where the money is going. But its does suggest someone somewhere thinks theres a good chance he''ll get the job. Jewell''s odds shorten on betfair....well....that''ll justbe the same to be fair. Who actually knows? Well, I''d suggest no-one...probably not even the Burnley chairman yet.

[quote user="greenTshirt"]Paul Jewell now joint favourite Oh well, it''s be a fun day [/quote] Where did you see that?

Someone''s still putting money on Lambert though. His odds keep shortening. He''s at evens with Skybet, and almost evens with BetFred and Paddypower. I think there must eb something in it. Hopefully not too much though. http://www.oddschecker.com/football/football-specials/burnley-specials/next-permanent-manager Worrying reading to be honest. It would appear (well...i''m guessing) that they''re probably interested at the least.

Agreed. This is a very odd one. hasn''t really scored, and most of his appearances this year have been from the bench (12 out of 16). But then he was linked with Fulham in the summer, so he must have something about him. surely? In Lambert We Trust.

[quote user="Ren"]What you have all missed in your arguments about the dvd costs - is paying the people who take the time to put put the thing together. Yes they may only cost a few pence to produce but the time involved in putting it together is not a 5 min job. I am sure that the print run for a poor season is 500, and for a good season 2000-3000. We are not dealing with big numbers are we so I doubt the club are cleaning up, just providing a service for fans who like a visual record of the games they have been to.[/quote] And that''s without factorting in the cost of transport...staff wages in the shop...overheads...etc

Can''t believe no-one has said this yet.... David Strihavka...surely he''s got to be up there. P.s. People mention Iwan/Huckerby etc...i wouldn''t class these as cult heroes, they are heroes. Cult heroes has got have a kind of.....comedy...about them. E.g. Ginger Pele/maybe Simon Lappin

Also, that is NOT the formation which was played today. Martin was playing Left Midfield, not supporting Holt. Hoolahan was played "in the whole".

[quote user="jas the barclay king"]i dont know anything about McNally to be fair.. i think Whaley might do well for us though! jas :) [/quote] It''s good to have someone up the top with some good footballing knowledge, as well as business knowledge. And...Gunn said Whaley "will be worshipped", so he clearly thinks he can be the "heros" Roeder failed to produce.

[quote user="ScottNcFc"]Hmm, he said we made a bid for Paul Parry?Was this correct?[/quote] I highly doubt it. What would be the point in bidding for a player who played regularly for a good team in the Championship. I predict today may be the last day of his twitter if he''s proven wrong.

[quote user="Say Hello To The Angels"]Why are some people obsessed with us spending money? If we can get decent players in and they are free as well isn''t that a good thing? [/quote] I''m afraid this seems to be a disease of almost all (especially Norwich) fans. People would rather us risk £500,000 on a player (to show "ambition") than get someone equally as good on a free (which is always better).

But, it had been reported in the morning that he was on trial. He''s living off what cud''ve been guesswork. But here''s hoping...

[quote user="PhatCanary"][quote user="Hucks is Legend"]has stuff he has said been right before???[/quote] Yep spot on before! [/quote] What was he right about?

I will happily be proved wrong but, has this guy ever been right? Just because this guy has a twitter and is called "colneyspy" his word seems to be taken as gospel. Hope he is right and i will happily apologise.

http://www.canaries.co.uk/page/NewsDetails/0,,10355~1696213,00.html For those that need help :-p

It''s Nelson. On official site.

[quote user="ncfcfan"]How is Tudor Jones an impressive singing, he''s a swansea reject! Are we so shite now, we should be getting excited about rejects from swansea. I dont mind the Gill signing, at least he''s a player whos had a good season, but i would the rather the 250k was spent on a cm from league 1, 2 or even the conference who had an impressive season last season.We need to stop signing Premiership and Championship rejects and focus on getting in-form, talented and hungry players from the lower leagues. Its a formula that worked for Peterborough and i just feel that 250k could of been better spent. Getting a few players like Tudor Jones for a free would ok but spending money on him when we dont have a lot, i feel is a waste.[/quote] He wasn''t a Swansea reject actually. They wanted him to stay but he wanted to leave for more regular football. I''ll get the link form skysports if you want?

I agree with most people that players (especially ''keepers) need someone with experience to help them develop. I don''t think Doyle will be the ''keeper to do this as he is only 24. However, our GK coach is a certain Mr Crichton (not the one from Red Dwarf) so I think that "expereince" could easily come form him instead of a mentor who plays.

Many of you are still missing the point. NEARLY ALL TRANSFERS IN FOOTBALL ARE UNDISCLOSED. It''s just a fact of life (well, football). It''s got nothing to do with "secret spin" or "another way to tell us what they want" or "pocketing the money" (as some suggest) etc. Every club does it.

[quote user="Mook"][quote user="PhatCanary"][quote user="Stevee Wonder"] [quote user="Snakepit boys"]An undisclosed fee again no doubt. God I cant wait to get new owners. Please just sod off woman! [/quote] Blimey, any excuse to have a go!!! Nearly all fees in football are undisclosed (probably about 90-95%) I''d say, so if your going to abuse our owners, you need a better reason than that. [/quote] BAAAAA!!!! [/quote] Clever comment this Phat Canary, you must have thought about that little gem for a while. Someone (quite rightly) points out that we need actual *valid* reasons to have a go at the board, and gets called a sheep. Brilliant. Hmmm, I wonder why some people are slightly reluctant to join your angry mob ..... ? [/quote] Cheers Mook. I''m glad you understood where i was coming from. I wasn''t defending the board, just stating that there is no need for such "facts" or whatever being used to have a go at the board when it happens all the time in football.

[quote user="fearofambition"][quote user="Stevee Wonder"] [quote user="Snakepit boys"]An undisclosed fee again no doubt. God I cant wait to get new owners. Please just sod off woman! [/quote] Blimey, any excuse to have a go!!! Nearly all fees in football are undisclosed (probably about 90-95%) I''d say, so if your going to abuse our owners, you need a better reason than that. [/quote] OK, how about being a set of useless c**nts who have dragged us to our lowest position in 50 years, that good enough for ya stevee? [/quote] Yea, that''s fair enough. It just annoys me when such petty/meaningless things are used against the board.